Khoodeelaar! No to ' BIG BUSINESS MIC AGENDA CROSSRAIL SCAM...' campaign told the LONDON EVENING STANDARD so!
Now, after years of hiding the truth, the EVENING STANDARD confesses, still reluctant to face the facts and tell the truth: even the 'city of LONDON-friendly' UK CON PARTY finds CRASSRAIL too much!
And seven years too late, the EVENING STANDARD publishes 'fresh doubt' in the UK CON PARTY about crossrail!
We say, 'better' late than not at all! The LONDON EVENING STANDARD carries on its touting stance for Big Business agenda in the coverage it gives to Ken Clarke’s doubting of Crossrail.
Who will you vote for? Make money with your opinion
London's long-awaited Crossrail scheme was thrown into fresh doubt asKenneth Clarke raised a question mark over its funding package.
The shadow business secretary said a go-ahead could not be given by the Tories until they are in power and went over the Treasury books.
He said: “When he takes office, [shadow chancellor] George Osborne is going to have to look at the full range of financial commitments that have been entered into by the Government.
"I think the party is favourably disposed towards Crossrail but I can't say how and when we can firmly commit to the pubic sector contribution.”
Mr Clarke's verdict will dismay business leaders clamouring for the delayed £16 billion east-west rail link.
Tory leader David Cameron, however, has signalled strong support for the project which is regarded as essential to Boris Johnson's re-election. But he said that nobody outside the Treasury yet knows the scale of liabilities left over from Labour's giant private finance schemes.
He added: “If I were George [Osborne] I would keep my powder dry. It's silly in an election campaign to commit to expenses until you know if you can afford it.”
A bit late for the Conservatives to question Crossrail. The block of fine old buildings at the southwest corner of Tottenham Court Road and Oxford St. has already been demolished. (I'm surprised that Labour hasn't by now sent the bulldozers into the village in the way of the third runway at Heathrow.)
The Conservatives always make big noises on issues that they know they will have no power to change - such as the Lisbon Treaty, Crossrail, Heathrow expansion, probably ID cards too. All 'done-deals'.
- Phil Jones, London EU
The ES's very own Simon "I hate Crossrail" Jenkins certainly isn't helping to maintain support for the project.
- Keith, London
This is pathetic posturing from the Tories. If they cancel this they really are clueless as some of us suspect already. perhaps it is time to give the 3rd party a real go.
- David, London
Look around and you will see Crossrail is BEING BUILT right now and if the Tories think they can cancel it now then we need to know how many millions would be wasted in compensation payments to those who have contracts already.
Their is also Canary Whalf who are funding the station cancel Crossrail and i dont see why they should fund another station ever again.
in fact cancel Crossrail and you can say goodbut to private funding of anything because their will always be uncertainty that a government will stop a project. This will mean all government capital spending will have to come from the taxpayer so its back to schools with leaking roofs given the way the tories "failed to mend roofs for when the sun was not shining!".
No Crossrail and London will loose business to EUROPE where they dont suffer from dogma driven politicians who live in a fantasy world.
Real question for Londoners is would Mayor Boris resign or just roll over like Cutler did when the fleet line was cancelled by the Heath Government?
- Melvyn Windebank, Canvey Island, Essex
A bit flippin' late isn't it? Half of Oxford Street has already been carved up in the name of this 13-years too late project.
Khoodeelaar! Diagnosing the latest exhibition of the BLIARing role performed by Blair's mate Charlie Falconer now posing as a de facto ally of Ken Livingstone in talking up 'Stratford'. Falconer does so by hyping up the latest Big Biz agenda scam for swindling the UK public, HS2. Falconer is very much a peddler of the Big Biz agenda scam Crossrail... HS2 is the addendum being faked in by the touts in place in the Palace of Ghostsminster as well as in the Blaired UK regime fronted [since summer 2007] by G Brown. The fakery is persisting despite the fakers 'catching one another out', as happened yesterday [Wednesday 17 March 2010] at the routine exchange of fakery called PMQs. UK G Brown confessed to having faked a lot of the info about ‘Defence’ spending. That confession is a mere clue. Students of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign did not have to wait until that moment. We have been diagnosing and exposing G Brown’s own fakery ‘vah-loos’ for years. And in context. And on the daily evidence of the occurrence as it occurred: faked faked faked! Neither ‘front bench’ in the House of C is familiar with telling the truth. So both fake. And as they fake they make it impossible for observers to see any point in their being in place. Except that they serve the forces of lying. Forces of hell! They are faking for the forthcoming [widely touted to be 06 May 2010] pretext called general election when they will be able to fool enough gullibles [Oops! 'Voters’] to vote for them so that they can fake with 'legitimacy’ for a full term [ Ceteri s p a r i b u s [Oops! There is a Latin-looped ‘Boris’-ref popping up in there somewhere in that phrase]
Khoodeelaar! Told UK d Cameron so! That BIG BIZ agenda scam Crossrail was a diversion, a waste and a source of debt that was not affordable. That the existing London transport infrastructure was much more important. Now that even d Cameron has begun to see that we were absolutely accurate, spot on and truthful, he has only one option that he can apply: say that Crossrail is crass and that if he [UK D Cameron] leads his party into govt following the election, he will scrap the scam. If d Cameron does say this then he will gain much needed credibility. In the context of accountability. And towards truthfulness in the UK parliament. If d Cameron fails to say so then he will stay in the moral rot where all ‘mainstream’ political party leaders and their gangs are in the UK and have been for decades. We have also been pointing out with daily evidential update and illustration for over six years now that the existing transport infrastructure in London was not up to standard and that without addressing the upgrade, maintenance needs in that infrastructure, the economic priorities of the travelling London public could not be begun to be addressed. And that is the crux. Nobody who ignored that could be even included in a list of possible representatives of the people of London let alone of the uk we have pointed out with regular evidential illustrations that the touts in office of the big business agenda scam Crossrail were lying against other regions of the uk when they said that ‘lundun’ was funding the rest of the uk. We have been showing that the touts did the lying to undermine the genuine transport needs of the regions. They did do that to overstress the importance of big biz agenda scam Crossrail. Will UK Dave Cameron distance himself from all of that touting for Crossrail and will he speak out for the LONG NEGLECTED and long ignored and the long distorted [by the ‘London-OTT-mythology’-centric lying touts of Big Business] economic and the transport economic needs of the various regions of the UK in the context of this analysis? Does UK D Cameron have what it takes to tell the latest Big Business lying scam HS lobby to get lost? Is UK D Cameron a prisoner of Big Biz policy dictating lobby or is he a democratic representative of objectively active opinion in ain intellectually autonomous independently sovereign UK? Can Cameron tell the difference between the Liesmen of the Lehman Brothers, their stooged and colluding Bib Biz serving SLEAZEball law firm LINKLATERS and their sorts and the genuinely independent sources of legal and constitutional and democratic opinion, advice and insight in and for the UK? Is Cameron putting Sam On [we have devised a phrase there as a diagnostic device to detect the depth of Cameron’s moral destitution here] the parade for a substantive political purpose of conveying a truth? Or is he doing so because he lacks any substance of a morally forceful political message to put across instead of indulging in the de facto exchange of gloating assertions around a trophy wife in the run up to a vulgarised formal election? UK Con David Cameron should not indulge in con! UK Con D Cameron should avoid all con. [To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD the Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique so in 2007 at the 'formal' meeting of the 'Full Council' when 'Councillor Bill Turner' asked the question and then failed to acknowledge or reply to the many follow-up answers and materials that we subsequently published. To show that the 2012 Games hosting was a callous, crass act. That it meant NOTHING of substance to the ordinary people in the East End of London borough of Tower Hamlets. We have been saying it for ages, at least since before the OTT-hyped ‘bid’ that was spectacularly snatched by the ‘de facto’ relocation of the HQ of the UK Government to Singapore for the duration of the Bid CULT-religious-ceremony that the Games Hosting was not going to benefit ordinary people. We have also said that the adventure would cost the ordinary public disproportionate sums of money. That it was a diversionary from the actual day-to-day needs and services that were failing to be delivered. That the OTT-hyped 2012 Games Hosting in the name of London was nothing whatever to do with the ordinary lives, the ordinary needs, the ordinary ‘aspirations’ [there IS a word! My my my! There is even a word called ‘aspiration’ emanating from the ‘inner city’ ‘most deprived borough in the country’] of the ordinary people who live in and battle in the East End of London. Battle for rights that are most of the times beyond our reach. Due to individual and institutional ignorance, obduracy and corruption by and via and in then name of the ‘elected local councils’ and their likes. Like the regional London Assembly and the hocus pocus representatives on it in the name of the area that includes the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. And in Parliament. And in the actual departments of Government that are forever allocating funds to sets of corrupt individual and outfits in the name of regeneration in the ‘deprived’ areas. We shall examine the latest evidence of those degeneration funding in a series of updater commentary in the very near future. . That the 2012 Games Hosting stunt was part and parcel of the Big Biz touting stooging role played by the likes of the fake progressive Ken Livingstone. That in the period since that particular evidential and ethical, moral, democratic disengagement between Khoodeelaar! and the likes of the time-servers on the ‘local’ ‘elected’ Tower Hamlets Council, NEW evidence has come to light reinforcing our thesis, our diagnosis and our conclusion. That like the wasteful Crossrail, the 2012 games Hosting is an economic irrelevance to the ordinary people and our lives in the East End of London. And that is a kind statement. If we were to be blunt the commentary would read indeed very differently. [To be continued]
The web site of the London EVENING STANDARD: accessed appx 1625 Hrs GMT Tuesday 09 March 2010:
Kate Hoey loves her football. A founder member of the London Northern Ireland supporters' club, the 63-year-old Labour MP for Vauxhall has spent a lifetime working in and around the national game.
She was employed as an educational advisor by Arsenal for four years before entering Parliament in 1985 and has also worked at Chelsea, Tottenham, Queens Park Rangers and Brentford.
And yet football has inflicted the most grievous wounds on Hoey during her political career. In 1995, after Arsenal boss George Graham was found to have taken a £425,000 bung from agent Rune Hauge following the acquisition of John Jensen and Pal Lydersen, Hoey incurred the wrath of the game by initiating a debate in the House of Commons.
“I introduced a 10-minute rule bill to set up an independent football compliance authority,” she tells me. “Football laughed it out of court. Now bungs are back in the news and many people are articulating my views.”
In her brief, but remarkable two-year tenure as sports minister, football was always an issue.
The day she was appointed in 1999 the Football Association announced Manchester United would be allowed to withdraw from the FA Cup to play in the FIFA World Club Championship — a strategy designed to help England win the right to stage the 2006 World Cup.
She adds: “I was told by Alistair Campbell [Tony Blair's director of communications and strategy] not to say anything about it. Then I was told by Anji Hunter [director of government relations] that I must say something.
“Two people in Downing Street saying two different things. So I told BBC Radio 5Live it was a pity Manchester United have been allowed to opt out of the oldest cup competition.
“The Mirror newspaper made me a heroine but The Sun said I should be sacked. Downing Street was in awe of football. People like Alistair were obsessed by it. Football could do no wrong. Officials would get access to the Prime Minister easily. My protests that special favours should not be given to football were not liked. I was seen as part of the awkward squad.
“They did not see sport as other than a great opportunity for a photo call, Tony heading the ball in a training session at Newcastle United. No real understanding of the importance of sport, the role that sport can play in saving money in health, cutting crime.”
Now football is causing another headache as Hoey wrestles with her role as sports commissioner charged with delivering London's grass-roots 2012 legacy for Mayor Boris Johnson.
The head of the Government's legacy company, Baroness Margaret Ford, is talking to West Ham about taking over the tenancy of the Olympic Stadium and Hoey, who has no control over what happens to the arena, has some advice.
“I will be opposed to the stadium just being handed over to a football club,” she insists. “I'm very happy for West Ham, or even better for Leyton Orient to be there. But I would like to have local community use of the stadium. Football stadiums are busier on non-match days in Europe. During the day nothing happens at Wembley. I'm aware somebody has to keep their eye on football or the public purse will get literally screwed.”
Hoey accepts the concept of legacy was brilliantly articulated by Lord Coe in Singapore, when London beat Paris, but her doubts centre on the failure properly to define the term.
“I think there has been a government failure on legacy,” she says. “They have not said what they mean. Some people within government have taken their eye of the ball because they are concentrating on the Olympic Park and have forgotten the promises made in Singapore.”
Hoey then reveals that Coe now wishes he had never made such a big issue about what followed the Games.
“Two years ago I spoke to Seb about legacy. He said, Kate, I wish I had never used the word legacy'.”
Hoey's doubts about that issue were confirmed in December when the Office for Government Commerce presented ministers with a secret report. The contents, which have since been revealed by me in the Standard, warned ministers there is “a natural level of concern and perception that little is being done and that the legacy is at risk”.
The only legacy document singled out for praise by the officials was the one prepared by Hoey's team called A Sporting Future for London. This document, backed by £30million investment is, says Hoey, meant to bring coherence to the fragmented landscape of the capital's sport.
“London has too many organisations, too many agendas,” she says. “Every one of London's 33 boroughs does different things. For the first time, we are trying to get joined-up sports organisations. By the end of 2012 we shall see a step change, more accessible facilities, a lot more people involved in coaching and facilitating others to get involved.
“The Olympics may be going on in east London but what about kids living on a Dollis Hill estate or Mrs Bloggs and her family in Kingston? We are trying to make a difference to them all.”
But will the Olympic Park be used 90 per cent of the time for the community after 2012 as Johnson has said? Hoey accepts that is a wish, not a promise.
“I cannot guarantee that London's Olympic Park will not become like Athens [mothballed and hardly used]. The Park is not my responsibility.”
What she can influence is how much money is spent on the 2012 Olympics in what are financially tough times.
During our hour-long working lunch in her House of Commons office there is only half a ham sandwich on the table to eat. It is an appropriately frugal meal in keeping with the Olympic message from Johnson's office.
“Boris has made it very clear that we do not want an extravagant Games. Yes, extravagant sporting venues, the best training facilities for the athletes and the best Olympic Village, but the special privileges of a huge number of officials should be limited.”
As sports minister Hoey was part of the “Olympic family” during the 2000 Sydney Games and the memory of the extravagance she herself enjoyed still appals her.
“I am against the way I was treated in Sydney. We went everywhere in chauffeur-driven cars. We are talking of a large number of people who come to the Olympics: sport ministers from all the countries, many heads of state and prime ministers. Then you have members of the national Olympic committees and of the international sports federations.”
If pushed she would allow “chauffer-driven cars” but not Olympic lanes. She adds: “Olympic lanes would disrupt the average Londoner's movement and will not be welcome. Officials could take taxis to Kings Cross and then public transport to Stratford.”
On this matter Hoey is in direct conflict with Craig Reedie, the British member on the IOC executive board, who believes the lanes are a must.
He said Londoners must be prepared to put up with a bit of disruption for the smooth running of the Games but Hoey says: “The IOC act as if they are a mini government, a Vatican of sport. The IOC now has status at the United Nations. Why? The time has come for a host city like ours to challenge them.
“This should be about athletes and Olympic ideals. We should not behave as if we were a branch office following orders from the IOC's Lausanne head office. We've got the Olympics, everything is running well ahead of schedule, there is no way the IOC can take the Olympics away from London.”
Another area on which Hoey wants London to stand up to the IOC is the opening ceremony.
“No Londoner wants huge money spent. Other countries may use the opening ceremony to tell their nation's story but everyone knows our history. An opening ceremony that lasts five hours, all that razzmatazz and millions of pounds spent on fireworks, that is really, really silly.”
Hoey was sceptical about London bidding for the Games but is now anxious they make a difference to the city she loves. She says: “The genuine concern I have is: will there be genuine legacy?
“No Olympic city has ever delivered a sustained legacy. We could end up in London with fewer swimming pools for example after the Olympics than before. That will be a disaster. That could happen because local authorities are so badly funded and cannot maintain these facilities.”
While she has hopes the Games can make a long-term difference to London, Hoey has doubts about other parts of Britain.
“The rest of the country was also promised legacy and I have no idea what is happening,” she says. “The Government has not translated what was said in Singapore in a tangible way right around the country. Unless things change I fear a backlash.”
Khoodeelaar! Told you so! At 0830 GMT today, we diagnosed the corrupt UK 'economy' and its corrupt peddlers and symbols - BCC, CBI and IoD to take only three- and said that the 'recovery' was in effect a sham one. Now, less than three hours later, the CBI, IoD and BCC-peddling Daily Telegraph web site echoes in effect what we had said. But will the Boris Johnson-peddling Daily Telegraph ever admit the truth and actually agree with us and say that Crossrail is crass and that it must be scrapped together with everything else that is just as MIC and just as CRASS?
KHOODEELAAR! told you so for six years and a month. Khoodeelaar! is telling you so again on Sunday 07 March 2010: that all touts, stooges, agents and patsies of big business 'in office' [that is formally and or tokenistically occupying ‘positions’ in states, states and in states of denial] do get caught! Albeit ever so insignificantly apparently. But they do get exposed. And caught. It is up to the ordinary public to then make due and democratic use of such exposures! Thus we point out that Big Business agenda-courier UK G Brown’s ‘assertions’ made before the staged Chilcot inquiry were rubbished within almost minutes of their occurrence as being untruths. The people who drew attention to G Brown’s misleading utterances included some of the UK’s very authentic, the very own supporters and members of the Big Business, Military Industrial Complex CLUB. The generals! Not surprising then that the Big Business propaganda outlet, the multiplexed BBC gave due and sustained coverage to the generals’ gestures generating huge hot air and little truth. For they all belong to the same club and they play to indulge their own cravings. The little matter of the burden on ordinary people is not in their frame of mind. Framed mind. Framed in accordance with the fraudulent fantasies fabricated by the conceivers of the Big Business scam. So it was that G Brown found no difficulty in letting Chilcot know that money had never been a problem as far as the UK Blaired participation in the occupation of Iraq went. So in a single day’s sitting before the Chilcot charade that Brown had himself confected and brought into being, he did away with millions of questions. And nobody really was anywhere near his entrance or exit from the faked theatre of interrogation to interrogate him over his role in the multiplicity of crimes, outrages, offences and allegations. Against the evidential background of all this: is it any wonder that on Friday, the same day that saw Brown’s staged appearance before Chilcot, the ‘progressive’ tout for Big Business scam, Ken Livingstone was on hand at a state-approved address in the Whitechapel Road, opposite the Road’s junction with the Greatorex Street [off the Hanbury Street in turn off Brick Lane] in London E1 to signal to the very G Brown that he, Big Biz-agenda backer K Livingstone, was still doing HIS bits for their masters as he let drop a list of big infrastructure projects that must be kept being publicly funded to counter the UK Tory electoral threat facing G Brown and his Blaired entourage desperate to get re-issued with their licence to trade as lobbyists for various MIC interests as they disguise themselves as elected [Ooops! re-elected] MPs….And their anxiety to resume their bit parts as they huddle in selected rooms 'legitimised' as select committee locations where they can give rubber stamps on the new lots of Big Biz scams contained as ‘parliamentary Bill’s…
Just as the ‘Crossrail Bill’ was embraced by Alan Meale and his co-stooges in Parliament [2005-2008]
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That ALL touts of Big Business bring bad news in their wake. In fact they cause bad news in their places. And communities suffer. People pay for the abuses of powers that may be available to touts who peddle the agenda of Big Business Military Industrial Complex. Ken Livingstone, who made ‘friends’ with Gerald Ronson and his likes from the culture `and the environment of London’s OTT-hyped ‘Square Mile’ the still misleadingly called ‘the City of London’, did that too. Livingstone, whilst in office of ‘mayor’ in the name of the people of London, took money from Ronson a few years ago. Then he claimed to have forgotten all about that money. Until, years later, the Murdoch-owned Sunday Times INSIGHT team found evidence of the money transfer! Livingstone very reluctantly admitted that cash receipt. And then went on to put the blame on someone else [who in turn and conveniently was NOT named by Ken Livingstone or by his coterie of publicists at the time] in his re-election campaign. That shows that even Livingstone knew that he should never have sought the cash from the likes of Gerald Ronson. That was also historically and in the context of the published archives of media reports about him in the UK, a rare example of Ken Livingstone being caught out. For in his opportunistic and often egotistic, undemocratic and questionable ‘career’ posing as a progressive, Ken Livingstone has been the subject of accurately perceived criticisms over a wide range of abuses of his powers in the name of the ‘democratic electorate of London’ but he has escaped the actual accountability of being caught red-handed with say cash in his hand. Except on this one occasion. Cash was involved. And the cash could not have come from a more unacceptable cultural, not to speak dubious political source. Other touts of Big Business don’t behave differently. But they never volunteer information far less confessions to the abuses they do commit and perpetrate. They have to be investigated. They have to be found out and caught out. They have to be exposed. That is the only way that little people can avoid being misrepresented, violated by the touts in place occupying the positions of power in the name of the little people. Crossrail has been touted for by all placemen and place women. They defer to Big Business. The touts defer to the agenda of Big Business. They utter like parrots the scripts written and handed to them by other touts and agents of Biog Business. In London in the past ten years, there has been no other caser other than the smaller scaled 2012 Games Hosting one than the Crossrail scam. No reason is ever given for the secret society like promotion of it. And even when the peddlers and the touts are exposed, criticised for their lack of competence and relevance over other decisions they make, they are treated as SAGES when they repeat the mantra written for them by the secret forces behind the agenda for Big Business Crossrail. Just how this is being perpetrated is witnessed in Tower Hamlets. It is clear that after their initial failures – when the Reichmann adventure [arriving in Tower Hamlets via North American de tours] failed to produce the necessary legitimising focus for the Right to congregate on the former Isle of Dogs, they have been allowed by Blair to do so and they are now taking over the huge chunk of the East End of London under one guise or another. Not least by imposing one high tower after another…And Crossrail, is a tool that is being used to derive the assault on the economy and on then environment of the East End of London. Progressive Ken Livingstone’s Reactionary legacy! Indeed!!! [To be continued]
TEXTS below taken from the web site of the ESTATES GAZETTE:
“Boris Johnson sees towers of money for Crossrail By Nadia Elghamry on September 9, 2009 11:43 AM
No Comments
No TrackBacks Boris Johnson clearly had something to celebrate on Twitter yesterday.
Under his MayorofLondon moniker he wrote: Crossrail is an unstoppable force. Thanks a billion to the European Investment Bank! #TfL #London
http://bit.ly/17zAIL
So we've been wondering in the office if this means he will step back from using his planning powers to force Tower Hamlets to reconsider its decision to reject Commercial Estates Group's 63-storey Columbus Tower in Canary Wharf, E14. Johnson called in the decision last week because it "would deliver a significant contribution to Crossrail". EGi subscribers can read last week's story here. Well, it certainly one way to decide tomorrow's skyline.
Image is by Dr. Progoganda used from Flickr under the Creative Commons license. Categories: Development, Infrastructure, London, Regeneration, Transport, planning Tags: boris johnson, canary wharf, columbus tower, commercial estates group, crossrail, london mayor, mayor of london, planning, tower hamlets, twitter No TrackBacks TrackBack URL: http://www.estatesgazette.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/63780 Leave a comment What a user pic? Get a Gravatar! Sign in to comment, or comment anonymously. Name Email Address URL Remember personal info? Comments (You may use HTML tags for style) Subscribe to comments by e-mail?
KHOODEELAAR! to ‘Bethnal Green South’ & Stepney wards IN PARTICULAR to Say No to Crossrail hole
1300 GMT London Sunday 15 November 2009: In this Muhammad Haque picture of KHOODEELAAR! Campaign supporters seen next to the “No Xrail Hole” sign on the wall in the Hanbury Street London E1 in April 2009, marking the occasion of the CRASSrail holes being abandoned. The holes that had been scheduled to be dug in Hanbury Street and at points to the west had been abandoned under the pressure of our campaign. [To be continued]
Stupidity of the CRASSrole-playing Mr S POUND MP is further exposed by today’s news.
BBC London 'joins' call for ditching WASTEFUL Crossrail
2130 GMT London Sunday 01 November 2009: Now EVEN the BBC, albeit via 'London' slot, floats the IDEA: SCRAP Crossrail! Why? 'Cos it is one BIG WASTE!
Khoodeelaar! caught Cable CRASSLY transformed into Mr Bean!
0845 GMT London Sunday 01 November 2009: This Muhammad Haque/AADHIKARonline picture was taken at the exact moment when Vince Cable transformed himself into Mr Bean. It happened as Cable exposed his ignorance about the place he was actually in as he faked a presentation as a Political heavyweight... He had no clue that Crossrail 'came through here' too! The 'here' was the 'Bethnal Green and Bow constituency' to put the full bureaucratic description. And Cable was making an appearance at a Tower Hamlets Lib Dems 'Party' 'political' do staged at the 'Oxford' [!!!!] House, off the Bethnal Green Road. He had, a bare three weeks earlier DISSED the same Crossrail as being of no real priority to his Party! At the ‘Bethnal Green’ transformation, Cable said that ‘Crossrail’ was a VERY GOOD scam [Oops! ‘scheme’] as long as ‘Vince Cable got the recognition as still being suitable as the true successor to Gordon Brown at No 11 Downing Street’ [Oops! Must get back with a correction to that tail end, in a bit] [To be continued]
Even the ITV London News 'presenter' had trouble saying 'Tony'
0100 Hrs GMT London Friday 30 October 2009: KHOODEELAAR! Had told the ITV London So. About Tony McNulty’s role. And about the role of other CRASSrail-agenda peddlers in place in the Brown-fronted, Blair-fronted Blaired regimes in the UK in the past 12 years. But ITV London news NEVER told the truth on any occasions about Crassrail. They have now realised that the truth is somewhat impossible. Because of the undeniable wave of evidence about just how corrupt the UK Parliament is, some of the truth about that has become irrepressible. At least on aspects of the roles played by some of those. So, in the past 2 hours they have carried the ‘news’ that only in principle sheds light on the dishonourable roles played by the peddlers…. ITV London News bulletin, as read out by their presenter [shown in the picture here] after the ‘News at Ten’ main bulletin had this: “. Parliamentary watchdog has ruled Harrow East MP T’ [sic] Tony McNulty was wrong to use public cash, EFFECTIVELY subsidised [sic] his parents’ living costs. He’s been ordered to pay back more than £13,000 and apologise to fellow MPs…” [To be continued]
Even the DAILY MAIL, not a really ethical organ, mocks McNulty
1950 GMT London Thursday 29 October 2009: Khoodeelaar! told Gordon Brown so! We had even warned Tony Blair against unethical conduct in the name of 'parliament' via Parliament.. And we did warn BOTH [Blair and Brown] about allowing Tony McNulty to appear to be beyond the reach of the minimal moral reproach that 'still' 'just about' existed and ‘still’ ‘exists’ [albeit very marginally] in the UK... What a crass response we have seen from all three.. Not surprising then that ALL three have been peddling the agenda of the CrossRail scam one way or another.. What we had observed about the mechanical, motor-mouth utterances and appearances by Tony McNulty on all aspects of the discredited, deficit-begetting regimes of Blair and Brown was the irrationality of his media-disseminated disposition and his apparently, visually contemptuous demeanor towards the ordinary public and viewing members of the community. On the evidence IN CONTEXT of those appearances and utterances, McNulty was not aware of the callousness that he was increasingly personifying in his defiance on all issues that he was being floated to flog… Whether McNulty’s apology as staged in the UK House of Commons today [Thursday 29 October 2009] will change the culture of complicity with sleaze and corruption that dominates the Palace of Stooges at Westminster is another matter altogether. We know and record the fact that McNulty was one of the ones in the Crossrail, Big Business scam-cooking Department for Daft [Ooops! ‘Department for Transport’] when the CRASS Crossrail Bill was in fact cooked… Is there any surprise that the Crossrail scam is so crass, that it has turned out to be interminably crass as each day’s utterances by McNulty’s ‘related’ co-utterers typify ?! [To be continued]
CRASSRole-player Ken Livingstione's ex 'aide' admits CRASS end...
Lib Dem MP Kramer fakes a No to Big Business. She says YES to Crossrail
2330 GMT London Thursday 17 September 2009: Susan Kramer is seen here carrying a bold NO leaflet. But she is not saying No to Crossrail. She is in political disguise. As most of her fellow MPs are exposed to be in. Kramer thus gives succour to the violators of democracy …[TO BE CONTINUED]
SEARCH this AADHIKARonlione blog
London NEWS OF THE WORLD echoes KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business ploys 2012 Hosting
2140 Hrs GMT London Sunday 30 August 2009: KHOODEELAAR! Original analysis and commentary on the UK economics, politics and degeneration by Big Business Crossrail agenda-peddling forces…and their touts…Now even the Rupert Murdoch ‘News of the ******” has no option but to admit the truth. So overwhelming is the evidence that they have to, if they are to retain any credibility to James Murdoch’s claims that his ‘news’ organisation has any relationship with the facts on the ground! So we read in the print edition and on their web site [before Murdoch makes it inaccessible again as part of his prosperity and regeneration tactics] that the 2012 Games ‘work’ in East London is not ‘working for people in the East End of London’ after all….
DAISY Sampson has just admitted on ITV: Govt debt is too large.
1800 Hrs GMT London Thursday 27 August 2009: Even the ITV news reporter DAISY Sampson has just admitted that Govt debt is too large. So the 'recovery' from the current recession will be long and painful! Indeed!
The BBC News Channel facilitates time-serving C Wolmer.. It is all fake!
0210 Hrs GMT London Thursday 27 August 2009: KHOODEELAAR! noting the latest shallowness of the self-styled foremost railways expert C Wolmer: He is a tout & a peddler for Adonis lately of UK DafT.......
Even the Crossrail scam-peddling BBC admits! Bechtel doesn't deliver!
1440 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 25 August 2009 KHOODEELAAR! Told you so! That the Military Industrial Complex, that the Crossrail-imposing BECHTEL has typified in the UK in the job it has done of stooging the UK Houses of parliament out of their depths and their roles, is not intended to serve the people of London. Nor indeed the people of ordinary USA either. That Boris Johnson is now, at last, caught out as having peddled the BECHTEL-scam Crossrail far too eagerly, is not an incidental matter at all. Boris Johnson has to come of the intellectual inertia and grasp the truth and disown his touting role NOW. Start funding and SORTING the EXISTING London transport network, Boris. Quit being a tout for Corporate louts! Especially when EVEN Chris Grayling – who had been failing the people as he touted for CRASSrail from the Tory Front BEND! – is now waking up and uttering against crime and touting in inner cities England….. It is time that ALL manner of touting is exposed and condemned. And disowned…Start with scrapping the touting for BECHTEL-Crossrail [To be continued]
When the 'East London Advertiser' managed to recognise the truth, a historic event! January 2006
0418 [0358] Hrs GMT London Monday 24 August 2009: the dishonestly-‘edited’ ‘local’ paper the ‘East London Advertiser’ has been failing to apologise to the community in general and to KHOODEELAAR! in particular for publishing lying spin for the Tower Hamlets Council corrupt clique that has been backing the CRASSrail hole scam and agenda…The ‘ELA’ which the KHOODEELAAR! Movement has been describing as the ‘East London IDIOTISER’ following its dissection by CBRUK in the 1990s, has failed to recognise, let alone publish the truth of the campaign against the CrossRail hole scam-inviting clique on Tower Hamlets Council. There was an exception. The exception was in addition to the two items the IDIOTISER published on 21 October 2004 and 28 October 2004. Those two items were in the Idiotiser’s editions on the day before the first ever KHOODEELAAR! street action against the Crossrail hole scam-inviting Tower Hamlets CORRUPT Council ‘leadership’. The ‘historic’ occasion apart from those two pieces [21 and 28 October 2004] was in January 2006. The item is from the print edition of the ‘ELA’ dated 5 January 2006. We do this for evidential purposes and for references in the future. Those references may well include long overdue but pragmatically postponed legal action against the IDIOTISER. [To be continued]
Lest the crass role-playing East London IDIOTISER should lie again and 'forget' the campaigns news.
0245 Hrs GMT London Monday 24 August 2009 [2050 Hrs GMT London Sunday 16] August 2009: The 'East London Idiotiser' is the only rag that has peddled crass role-player 'minister' [!!!!] Sadiq Khan who has been stooged into post to try his 'ethnicity-linked' image as a vehicle to legitimise lying to the public. The IDIOTISER has failed to publish the Khoodeelaar! rebuttal of their promotion of the crass role-playing 'ethnicity linking' 'insulter' of the community, Sadiq Khan... The IDIOTISER is not only losing circulation because of idiocies it publishes but it is also exposing stark signs that its ‘decision making’ ‘editorial’ ‘executives’ [One and a bit] are fast losing whatever claim they used to have to being involved in a responsible publication…KHOODEELAAR! Here contextually updates the Idiotiser’s role and comments on the diabolical, malign role being played by the E L IDIOTISER against the interests of the people and communities across the East End of London [To be contin
ANGER OF the COMMUNITY in 2004 against Crossrail is echoed in the Docklands in August 2009....
2340 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 04 August 2009. Anger of a community’, was the front page splash [left] as carried by the then weekly TOWER HAMLETS RECORDER October [2004] KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole-inviter Tower Hamlets Council, demonstration held Greatorex Street, Off Hanbury Street in the Brick Lane London E1 area on Friday 22 October 2004....FIVE years on...STILL ANGER at crassrail...this time, it is anger of the business ‘community’ at the current crass role player in the name of the people of london, Boris Johnson.…..this front page splash [image on the right above] recording the anger against Crossrail penalty being imposed by Boris Johnson on London businesses, was featured on the 6 O’clock bulletin of the itv london news programme on Tuesday 4 August 2009. Evidentially and contextually, that was a very rare item to be featured on the ITV London NEWS programme at all. For years, they have peddled CRASSrail and totally suppressed all news from the community against CRASSrail scam....In suppressing the news of all activities and campaign evidence against Crossrail, ITV London News has behaved as LIE-TV for the past five years and seven months.. LIE-TV has aided and abetted the forces of greed, corruption, sleaze that have been among the main touts for CrAssrail at the expense of London...[To be continued]
ITV London at last admits that Crossrail Boris is Crass
2045 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 4 August 2009:Odd indeed that the same publisher which owns the crassly-edited and crassrail-peddling ‘East London Idiotiser’ has now published a totally contradictory item: "Anger over Boris' tax hike to fund Crossrail"...see below] the texts of the KHOODEELAAR! dissection of ARCHANT, East London Idiotiser, that was sent this afternoon [Tuesday 04 August 2009] to the ARChant Crassrail touting ‘east london local newspaper’ ‘title ’…….[to be continued]
CRASS-role.Boris.bragging.of.Barclays.benefit
DAILY.Mirror:...Boris: £250k I earn is just chicken feed'
Crossrail.peddler.Ken.Livingstone.indulges.....
1530 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 08 July 2009: KHOODEELAAR! Told you so! Only earlier today we updated our evidential commentary on the corrupting role that Ken Lyinsgtone had been playing as he was peddling the Military Industrial Complex’s agenda in the shape of the Crossrail scam. ..
Who is keeping London East Enders poor?
0520 Hrs GMT London Monday 6 July 2009:KHOODEELAAR! told you so! KHOODEELAAR! did so in February 2006 at the “Mulberry Place” remote ‘HQ” of the poverty-imposing Tower Hamlets Council, That particular demonstration was organised at 24 hour notice when KHOODEELAAR! learnt that the then ’mayor' [='chair'] of Tower Hamlets Council’ had refused to let a number of opposition councillors convene a special meeting of the Council to scrutinsie the controlling clique’s role in inviting the Crossrail hole agenda attack on the East End of London....[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! demo outside Parliament 12 noon Tues 6 June 2006
ACTION.archive.published27June.2009
Marching in East London against Crossrail hole agenda
1638 Hrs GMT London Thursday 28 May 2009: KHOODEELAAR! marched in the streets of East London on 17 January 2006 to register the opposition to the 'Crossrail Bill Select Committee' in the UK House of Commons. That stooged select committee was officially starting its stooging business for Big Business-agenda-ed, Blairing regime on that day. Khoodeelaar! marked the event by holding the march and reiterating NO to Crossrail hole Big Business agenda...... On that same occasion, KHOODEELAAR! also began a subsidiary campaign to aid George Galloway who was then coming under severe political fire both from the Blairing regime and from assorted others who also despised him but who were using the pretext at that ti,me given to them by George Galloway’s appearance on the Channel 4 Big Brother House [To be continued]
Scrap wasteful, diversionary Crossrail, says Simon Jenkins 28 April 2009
Crossrail will eat money. Kill it, Boris, and save the bankrupt Tube instead. says Simon Jenkins in the LONDON EVENING STANDARD
KHOODEELAAR! telling the truth on grim economic performance for years.. We told it in 2004...
CROSSRAIL costs a threat to London's tube system, starved of cash... THE ECONOMIST magazine PLUS
2340 Hrs GMT London Saturday 23 May 2009: The ECONOMIST magazine admits, " CROSSRAIL, a planned cross-London train service that would link Maidenhead in the west with Shenfield in the north-east, relieving the city’s crammed underground-railway lines, is a standing joke."
UK Parliament has been a corrupt and sleazy place, it is now clear: Martin Bell
0755 Hrs GMT London Monday 18 May 2009: KHOODEELAAR! will be updating on our campaign against CORRUPTING CROSSRAIL AGENDA.... follow the updates on twitter later today
KHOODEELAAR! demo Princelet Street, Feb 2005 No to “Crossrail Bill”
KHOODEELAAR! NO to CRASS role by Stooged UK Parliament - campaign commentary 24.7 on twitter
Cooper conceals CRASness of Crossrail as she causes Timms to smile with her staged act...
1535 Hrs GMT London Thursday 7 May 2009: UK Treasury Ministers Yevette Cooper and Stephen Timms appeared in the House of commons on Wednesday. It was another finance Bill event. In the course of the appearance, Yvette Cooper exchanged ‘statements’ with her opposition counterpart Phillip Hammond.. Unlike her normal presentation of being a controlled, composed persona, Ms Cooper was in a fighting mode.. Especially as she played what looked like a scripted act, heavily based on her ability to look opposed to Thatcherism..What a contrast that was. To the acts OF Thatcherism that she and her fellow ministers had been implementing in the almost 11 years that had gone by since the brigade took up the crusade for Thatcherism... Yes. That word, Crusade, is intended to be here... Back to Ms Cooper’s dramatic performance..She caused a historic event. Sh made Stephen timms sitting not far from her, actually look as if he was smiling! Not a mean achievement, that. As a diversion. What nobody could even want to smile about is the the behaviour in power that Ns Cooper is party to and part of. What does she know about Crossrail that we don’t? Apparently she was 'berating' Hammond for his failure to give a clear undertaking to BACK Crossrail.. We are challenging Yvette Cooper to substantiate any of her assertions about and for CRASSrail... We shall publish in the next hours the full texts of our challenge to Yvette Cooper being sent to her this afternoon..[To be continued]
FT looks as if the interference is not active at the moment 0425 GMT 7 May 2009
0425 Hrs GMT London Thursday 7 may 2009: KHOODEELAAR! can confirm that an article on the FT web site that reports on the Government's ban on London businesses having a say on Crossrail funding, has been the subject of cyber and legal pressures on the FT.. Resulting in the removal of the piece from the FT's web site... KHOODEELAAR! has retrieved the article from another site and will be updating in due course on our web sites and blogs on that significant interference with the FT....[To be continued]
TWITTER carries 24.7 KHOODEELAAR! Action diagnostics against Crossrail agenda
Muhammad Haque told UK rail trade journal that Crossrail was CRASS
0345 Hrs GMT London Thursday 7 May 2009: KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole Agenda began on 31 January 2004, at a meeting held at the 'Montefiore Centre' situated at the corner of Hanbury Street and Deal Street... The action mobilised by KHOODEELAAR! over the past 5 years and 4 months has involved undertaking high speed research on all key aspects of the Crossrail scam: Transport. Modes of transport. Business. Commercial. Economic. Technical. Engineering. Environmental. Not to even begin to talk about the legal and the constitutional implications. Or the linguistic. Or the historic. Or about the ‘East India Company’ and the encounter of June 1757 near today’s Kolkata.... In this picture taken at an action meeting against the Crossrail hole scam.., the Khoodeelaar! organizer is holding up one set of documents that bore evidence of the corruption of the Crossrail hole-inviter clique on Tower Hamlets Council...[To be continued]
The Conservatives always make big noises on issues that they know they will have no power to change - such as the Lisbon Treaty, Crossrail, Heathrow expansion, probably ID cards too. All 'done-deals'.
- Phil Jones, London EU