KHOODEELAAR! examining the role of the Daily Telegraph, “the pioneer paper on Mps’ fiddles” in shielding Crossrail scam-backer Boris Johnson

1620 [1545] GMT
London
Saturday 21 November 2009:
Editor © Muhammad Haque.

We have been asking why the Daily Telegraph won't publish a report by Celia Walden into Boris Johnson’s brain. The question arises from the ‘role’ the Daily Telegraph has played in the reporting of MPs’ expenses claims and other fiddles. And it also arises from what Celia Walden herself said – or attempted to say – on the BBC News Channel ‘newspaper slot’ under the nervous and irrational interference and impositions by fronter Chris Ekin. The main link between this Walden [her father being George Walden, of the Daily Telegraph-backed UK CON party] and the Daily Telegraph, is the fact Celia Walden CAN delve quite factually and informatively into a subject if she sets her mind to it. We say this in the context of the recent jibes, which we consider sexist, about her looks and made by the “Private Eye” of Ian Hislop, the significantly challenged personality who has himself featured as a caricature in the Daily Mail’s political gossip column in the past few months. That Celia Walden is most probably better looking on any stage or platform than Ian Hislop in his BBC-paid-for attires cannot be held against her! ‘Shurely’ not, especially when it is recalled that Hislop’s professional ‘father’ Richard Ingrams, himself hero-worshipped the Telegraph’s Deeds and has promoted the Telegraph on every available excuse and opportunity for the best part of 50 years now. We have already shown our independent estimation of Celia Walden’s journalistic abilities by linking to one of her previous pieces [published shortly before the 01 May 2008 ‘elections’ re ‘mayor’ in the name of the people of London] in which she promoted Boris Johnson and his father Stanley Johnson. In fact the timing and the contents of that piece show that Celia Walden was orchestrated to do a promotion piece for Boris Johnson with his father Stanley being used as a reporting prop.

So the ‘mystery’ why she has not written, or rather not been allowed to write a serious piece about the possible existence, the likely size and the probable composition of Boris Johnson’s brain is to be found in what the proprietors of the organ want.

After all, Boris Johnson himself is still an overly generously paid “employee” of the same title. And measured by his ‘explanation about’ the ‘chicken feed’ sum [of more than £200,000.00] that he is paid for lending his name to 50 odd pieces a year, it is quite possible that no one, Celia Walden included, is going to be allowed to really write an objective piece about Boris Johnson and see it published freely by the Daily Telegraph group. Not for at least another 3 years…

Which shows that contrary to the impression created by the Daily Telegraph’s covering of the series of MPs expenses and Peers’ fiddles earlier this year [and still continuing to a lesser extent], the title is as shy about holding to account all holders of political office as any of its rival titles linked with their own pet politicos is… No ‘danger’ of the truth really coming out through the Daily Telegraph group then! It follows therefore that the London Daily Telegraph is not about to REVEAL something no other ‘mainstream’ commercial print title in the UK has done, yet and say that CROSSRAIL is going to be scrapped because all the fiddlers touts ands stooges of the Big Business Bechtel-linked string pullers from behind the scenes have found out how crass the whole thing is…And 'guess' what! It all came out because of the extraordinary brain powers possessed by Boris Johnson, as boasted of by his father Stanley Johnson, in amongst other places, that interview with Celia Walden published just before the 01 May 2008 elections...!!!! [To be continued]