Sunday, May 31, 2009

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! For years! That Alistair darling lied to Parliament for Big Business Crossrail scam. He lied.

0135 Hrs GMT  London Monday 1 June 2009



KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! For years! That Alistair darling lied to Parliament for Big Business Crossrail scam. He lied. 


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6402211.ece


Chancellor Alistair Darling under pressure as Gordon Brown prepares fightback

Gordon Brown

Gordon Brown, preparing to be interviewed on The Andrew Marr Show yesterday

Cabinet defends Darling | Vernon Bogdanor | William Rees-Mogg | Brown pledges code of conduct | Cameron to face scrutiny

Alistair Darling was under mounting pressure last night after it emerged that Gordon Brown was considering replacing him as Chancellor with Ed Balls and there were fresh disclosures about his expenses.

Mr Darling was accused of claiming second-home allowances on two properties at the same time, which would be against the rules.

A spokesman for the Chancellor denied the alleged rule breach, which followed other suggestions that he charged the taxpayer for accountants’ fees. It has already been disclosed that Mr Darling is a “serial flipper” who has designated four properties as his second home in four years.

Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman, said that the Chancellor had been caught with “his fingers in the till” and should go.

Downing Street insiders insisted that nothing had been decided on the reshuffle, while senior ministers said that if Mr Darling was moved from the Treasury, he would be offered another top job, possibly Home Secretary. Sources close to the Chancellor denied a report that he had to be talked out of standing down at the next election.

The Prime Minister, meanwhile, turned down calls yesterday for a general election and made plain that he would defy any attempt from colleagues to drive him from No 10 after Thursday’s European and county council elections. Mr Brown said that the public expected him to clean up politics first and defeat the recession. Asked if he would respond to a Cabinet call to quit, he said: “No, because I am dealing with the issues. I am dealing with the economy every day.”

David Cameron, the Conservative leader, was dragged into the expenses affair after claims that he paid off a loan on his London home soon after taking out a £350,000 taxpayer-funded mortgage on his constituency house. He insisted he had done nothing wrong but agreed to repay the cash if he was found to have done so.

According to senior ministers contacted by The Times, there is unlikely to be any move against Mr Brown, even if the European results when announced next Sunday bear out polls suggesting that Labour could drop as low as 16 per cent.

Ministers say that party activists are more worried and angry than ever before. However, a challenge from the Blairite wing is unthinkable while Lord Mandelson remains at the centre of affairs, strongly backing Mr Brown, as he did yesterday. Mr Brown’s advocacy of policies favoured by the modernisers also makes any move from that area unlikely.

Labour has already changed leader once this Parliament and most ministers believe that this could only occur again if Mr Brown voluntarily steps down. Some want that outcome and would probably back Alan Johnson as a successor. However, all agree that a change of leader will only happen if Mr Brown decides himself to bow out.

His intention yesterday, in a BBC interview at the start of the most critical week of his career, was to make plain that he had no intention of doing so.

Instead, Mr Brown used the interview to show that he had a full agenda ahead of him, including swift action on MPs’ expenses and a longer-term radical programme of constitutional change, which he suggested, for the first time yesterday, could include a reform of the Westminster voting system. He backed the prosecution of MPs shown to have broken the law. Two of his MPs have been accused of claiming mortgage interest payments on mortgages that no longer existed.

The Prime Minister announced that he intended the clean-up, including the extension of freedom of information legislation, to include all public institutions, including the health service and the BBC.

Mr Brown heralded a constitutional renewal Bill within weeks that would include the new parliamentary standards regulator, which will take responsibility for MPs’ remuneration away from the Commons fees office, which is to be scrapped. It is also likely to include a new German-style statutory code of conduct for MPs, setting out in legislation their precise roles and possibly including sanctions if they fail to live up to them.

Mr Brown also announced the setting up of a new national democratic council, similar to his National Economic Council, which will take charge of wider constitutional reforms. These would include a Bill of Rights, lowering the voting age to 16, introducing a written constitution and possibly changing the voting system so that it was fairer but kept the link between an MP and his constituency. The Prime Minister appeared to align himself with the AV-plus system backed last week in The Times by Alan Johnson, who remains favourite to replace Mr Brown were he to go.

Friends of Mr Brown said that the only circumstance in which he would leave office early would be if he felt it would help the Labour party. “But he genuinely believes he is the best person to take us through this and there is nothing in the polls to suggest otherwise.” Several Cabinet ministers have said privately that the public’s low esteem of politicians would increase if there was any attempt to “backstab” Mr Brown, whom the public could at least see was trying to do something about the abuses.

What is the definition of 'age of majority' to be ? In reducing the voting age to 16 it would follow 16 year olds should be adults in court cases too. 

I have always thought that age is a foolish indicator of 'adulthood'. Perhaps instead it should be 'having compled a year of paid employment'.

John , London, UK

Here's hoping Darling goes and takes his 50 % tax and Non Domicile global taxes with him. Unfortunately, havent seen Cameron make any statement of either of the two. May be just as bad

Sanjay Khanna, singapore, Singapore

Don't listen to a word of it Gordon, you're doing a marvellous job.......for the Tories

John S, Andover, England

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Muhammad Haque's comments exposing Crossrail scam, as published IN BRIEF on Timesonline


As OBSERVED at 2020 Hrs GMT London Sunday 31 May 2009

Search Results

  1. Tunnel vision - Times Online

    23 Sep 2007 ... Muhammad Haque Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill 0125 Hrs GMT London Sun. Muhammad Haque, London, UK ...


    'Tunnel Vision' 
    And underneath in a subheading it says, 

    "Crossrail will slash journey times and bump up property prices on both sides of the capital" 

    Then you quote a whole range of property companies stating in gleeful terms how the prices of properties in currently deprived [!] areas will shoot up! 

    They specifically also mention the Whitechapel area in the East End of London. Poverty and deprivation there are between the UK's highest. There is no irony in the Crossrail hypers' glee that the deprived and the low-income people will SUFFER as a direct result of the ADDITIONAL income disparity and the ADDITIONAL social exclusion and inequality that crossrail will cause. 

    What a way to waste £Billions of public money boosting the coffers of those who cause inequality in society. The East End people WILL be made poorer still by the imposition of the Crossrail Trojan horse for speculators and big business 

    Muhammad Haque 
    Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill 
    0125 Hrs GMT 
    London 
    Sun

    Muhammad Haque, London, UK


    23 September 2007



    property.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/property/buying_and_selling/ article2497954.ece - Similar pages
  2. Westfield has ongoing vision for Olympic site - Times Online

    21 Jul 2008 ... Tower Hamlets, where is the money for them to spend in such plush shops? 0500 GMT Monday 21 July 2008. Muhammad Haque, London E1, UK ...
    business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/construction_and_ property/article4368426.ece - Similar pages
  3. City digs heels in over plea to fund Crossrail - Times Online

    27 Sep 2007 ... Muhammad Haque, London, UK. With inflation in the construction industry ... of the people of [and in] London! Muhammad Haque, London, UK ...
    business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/transport/ article2540145.ece -Similar pages
    More results from business.timesonline.co.uk »
  4. A Rich Mix of politics in East London - Times Online

    15 Jul 2008 ... No wonder Tower Hamlets is the 'most deprived borough in the country'. They admit it. With no sign of shame. Or sense! Muhammad Haque ...
    entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/ article4332838.ece -Similar pages
  5. Muhammad - Blogs, Pictures, and more on Blogged

    No to CRossrail hole scam CAMPAIGN organiser Muhammad Haque remindsTimesonline London of the crass role that had been played by Blair and Brown who ...
    www.blogged.com/about/muhammad/ - 32k - Cached - Similar pages
  6. 1100 Hrs GMT LOndon Sunday 17 May 2009: KHOODEELAAR! The ...

    17 May 2009 ... By Muhammad Haque. As posted on the London timesonline for publication. Clegg now has the absolute duty to carry through his comprehensive ...
    khoodeelaar.wordpress.com/.../1100-hrs-gmt-london-sunday-17-may-2009- khoodeelaar-the-constitutional-movement-against-... - 19k - Cached - Similar pages
  7. 1435 Hrs GMT 1535 Hrs UK Time London Sunday 20 April 2008 ...

    In the first response sent to the TimesonlineMuhammad Haque has said [at 2215 Hrs GMT] the following to Simon Jerkins' propaganda [which, as usual, ...
    khoodeelaar.wordpress.com/.../1425-hrs-gmt-1525-hrs-uk-time-london- sunday-20-april-2008-khoodeelaar-analysis-of-the... - 40k - Cached - Similar pages
    More results from khoodeelaar.wordpress.com »
  8. AADHIKARonline London: STANSTEAD: Daily Telegraph newspaper's ...

    Muhammad Haque Arguing against Crossrail, Times web site [Timesonline] September 2007. MUHAMMAD HAQUE Timesonline 27 September 2007 ...
    khoodeelaarlookingforarealparliament.blogspot.com/2008/12/stanstead-daily -telegraph-newspapers.html - 577k - Cached - Similar pages
  9. khoodeelaar (khoodeelaar) on Twitter

    Text of Muhammad Haque's comment to EVENING STANDARD on Crossrail ... noting at 0940GMT5May9 Timesonline HAS published a comment By Muhammad Haque...
    https://twitter.com/khoodeelaar - 26k - Cached - Similar pages
  10. [PDF] 

    Something doesn't add up at HMRC

    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
    Page 1 of 3 http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/columnists/ article3162445.ece .... Muhammad Haque, London, UK. Referring to Crossrail. ...
    uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/muhammadhaque.timesonline10ja2008.pdf -Similar pages

Friday, May 29, 2009

KHOODEELAAR! telling Nick Clegg to get on with freeing his Party of racists. Before uttering 'against' racist 'other' Parties



1710 Hrs GMT London Friday 29 may 2009


UK Lib Dems Party ‘leader’ Nick Clegg is not leading. Not really. He has been featured in snippets of the  broadcast media ‘mainstream’ news bulletins in the past 3 weeks. Demonstrably more frequently and  with longer bytes than had been the case over any comparable period ever before. This analysis also applies to ALL his predecessors holding the post in his ‘Party’.  But being featured in those snippets won’t be enough. Come any elections. True, his rating may rise as may his Party’s chances. But not by much.  Clegg must have something substantial  to say. He has been sniping at David Cameron probably on the assumption that by doing so he can entice Cameron's likely voters over to the Lib Dems’ side. This as a tactic may work. But not significantly. For that, significant shift of Tory voters to his Party,  to happen, Clegg has himself to start telling the truth. So far he has not been doing that. Making literally liberal sounding bytes and utterances is not good enough. Clegg should look at what HIS Party MPs’ record is, collectively. As Parliamentarians. As democrats. And as racists...Yes, as racists.  [To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That BOTH Boris Johnson and Louise Ellman were wrong [2]

MPs criticise Boris Johnson over snow action

Fri May 29, 2009 12:08pm BST
 
Email | Print |  | Single Page
Photo
«»1 of 2Full Size

LONDON (Reuters) - London Mayor Boris Johnson did not do enough and failed to provide leadership to help avert the chaos caused by the heaviest snowfall in the capital for decades earlier this year, a committee of MPs said on Friday.

Freezing weather and up to 20 cm of snow which fell on February 2 brought London to a standstill with nearly all underground train services suffering and most overground routes affected.

Furthermore Johnson ordered the suspension of all bus services, which normally carry about 6 million commuters across London.

The Transport Select Committee said all councils needed to improve transport coordination during times of adverse weather but singled out Johnson for criticism.

"The travel disruption at the beginning of February was unsatisfactory," said Louise Ellman, the committee's Labour chairman.

"While the unusually heavy snowfall meant that some disruption was inevitable, it is vital that all those involved ensure that winter maintenance plans and crisis responses are reconsidered so as to minimise disruption in the future."

The committee said it was concerned about the closure of the London bus network and expressed disappointment at Johnson, who had a testy exchange with MPs when he gave evidence to them, for his "apparent disregard for scrutiny."

"More active strategic leadership from Mayor Johnson and more practical effort on his part to oversee preparations for a rare but forecast event could have given the public far more confidence and might have ensured public transport services were restored much more quickly," Ellman said.

Johnson, the Conservative mayor, said the committee appeared to have taken a "partisan and wholly opportunistic approach."  Continued...

 

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That UK MPs were liars. That UK Pee-rs were liars..

1405 Hrs GMT London Friday 29 May 2009: 


KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That UK MPs were liars. That UK Pee-rs were liars.. The question is: will they be able to carry on lying to the UK public after the current washing??. Will anything change for democracy for ordinary little people in Britain.... The days that we spent in front of the lying members of the Crossrail Bill Select Committees in the two Houses of parliament.. will never be forgotten. How they lied to promote the Crossrail scam agenda. How much did the lobbyists pay to who is not yet published.. When will those facts get out? How they lied without shame. They lied without any display of any recognition of the duty they were under to allow the public the say... They colluded with the lobbyists for the USA Corporation Bechtel and they suppressed the views of the ordinary British  people who took so much trouble to prepare the objections against the Crossrail Bill...

Thursday, May 28, 2009

KHOODEELAAR! evidential note on the DAILY TELEGRAPH web site blogger calling for Geoff Hoon to be sacked

2150 Hrs GMT London Thursday 28 May 2009


KHOODEELAAR! evidential note on the DAILY TELEGRAPH web site blogger calling for Geoff Hoon to be sacked


KHOODEELAAR! analysis of that call, here, shortly...

2025 Hrs GMT London Thursday 28 May 2009 KHOODEELAAR! Evidential note on Peter Soulsby, ‘MP’ who was a member of the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’

2038 [2025] Hrs GMT London Thursday 28 May 2009

C
Soulsby is featured in the list so far published of the MPs found to have been involved in abusing their position and pocketing extra cash by deceiving the public. This is the very point that we have been making for years about MPs. We have been saying that the UK parliament was a ghost House. It needed live and truthful people actually telling the truth all the time. That someone like Soulsby sat on the ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘Select Committee’ shows that that committee was incapacitated from the start. And it was a stooged committee from start to finish. We told you so!

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! action update on marching in East London against Crossrail and helping George Galloway at his darkest hour since Blair ousted him

1638 Hrs GMT London Thursday 28 May 2009: KHOODEELAAR! marched in the streets of East London on 17 January 2006 to register the opposition to the 'Crossrail Bill Select Committee' in the UK House of Commons. That stooged select committee was officially starting its stooging business for Big Business-agenda-ed, Blairing regime on that day. Khoodeelaar! marked the event by holding the march and reiterating NO to Crossrail hole Big Business agenda...... On that same occasion, KHOODEELAAR! also began a subsidiary campaign to aid George Galloway who was then coming under severe political fire both from the Blairing regime and from assorted others who also despised him but who were using the pretext at that time given to them by  George Galloway’s appearance on the Channel  4 Big Brother House [To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! evidential note on CRASS contract given re CROSSRAIL to 'CAPITA' -

1625 Hrs GMT London Thursday 28 May 2009

KHOODEELAAR! evidential note on CRASS contract given re CROSSRAIL to 'CAPITA' -

________

Capita wins Crossrail western portal contract

Consultant Capita Symonds has won the contract to design the Crossrail western portal near Royal Oak in west London.

The £3M contract is the first to be tendered under the Crossrail Design Consultant Framework – the contracting mechanism used to deliver the designs for all infrastructure in the central tunnelled section of the project.

The frameworks were announced in December 2008 and Capita Symonds will work on the site which lies to the west of Paddington to provide transition from the overground to the underground sections of Crossrail.

Commenting on the award, Crossrail programme director Graham Plant said: “With the successful start of construction at Canary Wharf, we have taken another step towards making this project a reality. Crossrail looks forward to a fruitful partnership with Capita Symonds.”

Speaking to NCE, chief executive Jonathan Goring told NCE that: “It is a cracking project and if you look at what it means in terms of investments and the benefits downstream it is one of those things that had to happen.”

The portal is critical to Crossrail as it is the site for launching the Tunnel Boring Machines for the Central West tunnel sections of the railway scheme.

From this point, a tunnel boring machine will head east, while another will work westward from the Limmo Peninsula - a site currently serving the new Docklands Light Railway (DLR) extension to London’s City airport.

The TBMs will meet at Farringdon where their journey ends.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

KHOODEELAAR! evidential replay [2] of analysis by the ECONOMIST magazine in effect echoing the KHOODEELAAR! diagnosis made and published for years

0150 Hrs GMT London Thursday 28  May 2009: KHOODEELAAR! evidential replay [2] of analysis by the ECONOMIST magazine in effect echoing  the KHOODEELAAR! diagnosis made and published over the previous 5 years and 5 months by KHOODEELAAR! 



Crossrail v the Tube

Projects at war

May 21st 2009
From The Economist print edition

A long-postponed new railway threatens London’s Underground


CROSSRAIL, a planned cross-London train service that would link Maidenhead in the west with Shenfield in the north-east, relieving the city’s crammed underground-railway lines, is a standing joke. First mooted in 1974, it has become, like New York’s long delayed Second Avenue subway, a byword for false dawns, postponed promises and governmental vacillation.

The joke may finally be over. On May 15th Gordon Brown joined Boris Johnson, London’s mayor, to mark the beginning of construction on a £500m station beneath the Isle of Dogs, near one of London’s two financial districts. “Many people said it would never be built,” crowed the prime minister. “But today we are celebrating a defining moment for London, as Crossrail’s construction gets under way.” The £15.9 billion project, supposedly the biggest in Europe, is scheduled to be up and running by 2017.

Its birth has been difficult, as well as delayed. The funding package is tortuous. Transport for London (TfL), the capital’s devolved transport operator, and the Greater London Authority are contributing £7.7 billion in total, including £3.5 billion from a special surtax on London businesses. Around £5.6 billion will come from the central-government Department for Transport, and a few hundred million is expected from each of the Corporation of London (the City’s local government), Canary Wharf (a big property developer) and BAA (which runs the capital’s airports). Network Rail, in charge of Britain’s rail infrastructure, will top it all off with £2.3 billion.

Despite Mr Brown’s assurances, the funding for Crossrail is not yet guaranteed. The business levy relies on legislation currently passing through Parliament. Worried about a legal challenge to his plans, Mr Johnson has asked ministers for specific assurances that he can proceed with the tax without polling the firms concerned. And on May 20th he said he was considering asking the central government to make firms outside London contribute too, a move that is unlikely to be popular.

Such wrinkles will doubtless be ironed out. But Tony Travers, a Crossrail-watcher at the London School of Economics, worries that if the project does go ahead, it could be at the expense of London’s other big transport undertaking, the 30-year public-private partnership (PPP) to upgrade the city’s clanking Underground. It is already in trouble: Metronet, the firm responsible for two-thirds of the job, went bust last year. Its work was taken over by TfL, at a cost that is still unknown. And in September the contract regulator estimated that the price of the work due to be carried out between 2010 and 2017 by Tube Lines, the remaining contractor, was £1.4 billion more than TfL had thought.

These budget worries are causing headaches. A Whitehall bail-out of TfL looks unlikely in these straitened times (and in any case, the Treasury has already had to pay £1.7 billion to the creditors of Metronet, 95% of whose debt the government guaranteed). Crossrail cash could probably be diverted to prop up the Tube instead. Mr Johnson has insisted that Crossrail and the PPP are “co-equal” priorities, but Tim O’Toole, London Underground’s influential (and recently departed) boss, is thought to have argued forcefully that the Tube should take priority.

So which project will suffer? Either, or both. The recession has halted the growth of passenger numbers on the Tube. This reduces the urgency to build Crossrail (and further weakens TfL financially, since planned increases in fare revenues will not happen). On the other hand, cutting back or delaying Crossrail yet again would be acutely embarrassing, and its delicate financial arrangements would probably not survive a call for more cash later. Paring down the PPP contracts and hoping that Tube passengers don’t notice the absence of improvements they never enjoyed could prove more attractive.


KHOODEELAAR! evidential replay of comment by Simon Jenkins in effect echoing what Khoodeelaar! has been saying for years: Scrap wasteful Crossrail

0135 Hrs GMT

London Thursday 28 May 2009



KHOODEELAAR! evidential replay of comment by Simon Jenkins in effect echoing what Khoodeelaar! has been saying for years: Scrap wasteful Crossrail



Crossrail will eat money. Kill it, Boris, and save the bankrupt Tube instead

Simon Jenkins
28.04.09

Kill Crossrail. Kill it now. Offer it up as London's gift to public sector sanity, while there is still time to avoid millions of pounds climbing into billions on a project that London does not need. What London needs is a fully working, modernised Tube. So kill Crossrail to save the Tube.

Crossrail, with a completely new rail tunnel from Paddington to Liverpool Street, has few friends. It has been stopped and restarted too many times to count over the past quarter-century. When Gordon Brown said in 2007 that "it will definitely proceed", sceptics sensed the cold hand of death grip its throat.

When Whitehall set out a tripartite funding package for the line in 2008, the caveats and qualifications grew in number. In an interview in February the transport minister, Lord Adonis, warned the world that, if Londoners do not raise their two-thirds share, "the Mayor understands that Crossrail will collapse ... ".

Mention Crossrail to Boris Johnson and his normally open, cheerful visage changes to that of a parent just told his kids are on drugs. He starts to shake. When reminded that he once said Crossrail was "one of those times you have to say, get in that hole and keep digging" the look becomes a rictus.

At a farewell dinner at City Hall earlier this month, the outgoing head of Transport for LondonTim O'Toole, hinted at his known private view that Crossrail is capital madness. He pleaded with his colleagues to fight instead for the existing Tube, now teetering on the brink of insolvency. TfL executives know that continuing with Crossrail will eat money and distract management for a decade.

It would yield nothing but bad news stories, while severely disrupting traffic in central London just when it will be recovering from the water mains chaos. Test drilling is already upheaving St Giles.

Crossrail is no longer a railway that makes sense. Back in the Eighties it was way behind the Jubilee line and the then (and now) top priority, a new northeast/southwest line from Hackney to Chelsea and beyond. Lines were needed to fill the Tube-less no-man's-lands of Greenwich and Chelsea/Fulham.

It took Margaret Thatcher to force through the Jubilee line to help the Reichman brothers build Canary Wharf. Chelsea/Hackney has no such power backers.

This project's only real friends have been in the City, eager to fend off the "threat" from Docklands and garner the bulk of the 900,000 extra office jobs predicted for London a decade ago. Nobody expects that need now. The Central line's parallel capacity can easily be increased by station improvements and better management.

Crossrail's backers have duly fallen back on that catch-all for any extravagant project, "urban regeneration". But that involves taking the line far out to the east, at further cost. For all the efforts of consultants to prove otherwise, this line is neither profitable nor a priority for economic renewal.

Boris Johnson now has a golden chance. He knows the capital must tighten its belt somehow - especially after he failed to curb the gargantuan appetite of the Olympics (costing more than half the £16billion total for Crossrail).

Johnson has already had to end his predecessor's costly fantasies, the Thames Gateway bridge, the Cross-river tram and the Dagenham light railway extension.

The Government has offered £5.6billion to the Crossrail budget. The rest must come from a raised London business rate (£3.5billion), borrowing against so-called train access charges (£2.3billion) and £2.7billion from TfL, this time borrowing against future fares.

Given the recent history of Tube finances, these figures are wholly unreal. TfL is close to technical bankruptcy. Borrowing against future revenue is mad, especially when it has already been assigned to meet Crossrail's running costs. Has London learned nothing about dodgy accounting from the past five years of such projects?

Meanwhile the City Corporation is offering a meagre £200million, on top of which is budgeted £150million from City businesses and, once upon a time, £230million from the airports authority, BAA. Lord Adonis claims this amounts to a further £750million, which is inconceivable. The truth is that Crossrail is another financial pig in a poke.

The Government has already poured £2billion in extra guilt money into the Tube to finance its public-private partnership (PPP), the sunk cost of this now largely aborted scheme. No minister or official has ever taken responsibility for it - indeed the official, Shriti Vadera, has been rewarded with both a peerage and a ministry.

In addition, the Government has pledged a huge £39billion to TfL over the next decade, a sum higher than anything conceived during nationalisation. This, it says, will have to embrace the completion of the PPP scheme and Crossrail. But the latter is not formally ring-fenced.

This is the Mayor's great opportunity. He has a £1.4billion hole in his transport budget already and must somehow fund £3billion of debt left over from the Treasury's collapsed Metronet infrastructure company.

Adonis said last November that there was no way he would plug this hole, despite it being one of the Government's own creation. He could hardly have given a more direct indication of his willingness to see Crossrail crash.

Johnson could now argue that the £5.6billion for Crossrail be switched to other Tube projects, such as resignalling the Bakerloo and Piccadilly lines and replacing Metropolitan line stock, projects that may anyway have to be postponed to meet the cost of Crossrail. Cancelling the latter would relieve the Tube budget of a tidal wave of uncertain costs now advancing down the track.

This would enable Johnson to declare himself the saviour of London's Underground railway, after a decade of mismanagement and financial chaos.

By liberating himself from Crossrail and demanding that London be allowed to keep its transport grant, he could begin to reconstruct TfL's finances and meet its voracious appetite for new signals, stations and rolling stock. He could declare a clean slate.

Johnson need not fear the Government on this: if ministers wanted Crossrail they would have paid for it. He need not fear the City.

He can use the recession as an excuse to put this white elephant to sleep while garnering the popularity of restoring London's transport system to sanity. But first he must kill Crossrail.

Link to: Digg Reddit Delicious Facebook

Reader Views (36)

 Add your viewShow all

Here's a sample of the latest views published. You can click view all to read all views that readers have sent in.

A 'public transport' system is there to serve the needs of that public; the need for profit, though desirable, is therefore secondary. There are over 20 'service' providers in the greater London area because of privatization, this is a truly ridiculous situation. Stop wasteful advertising and 'poets of London Transport' and the plethora of give-a-way brochures and bring back the ROUTE MASTER BUSES!!! Give Londoners credit for common sense and stop making inane announcements!!!!

- Peter Jackson, London E1 0ND

The long branch of the Metropolitan Line from Paddington to Hammersmith via Ladbroke Grove could form the basis of an alternative Crossrail.

In this option, the line from Paddington to Stratford would follow the same route as the present proposal, but as a tube instead of full-size main line dimensions. At Stratford, the line would join end-on to the Jubilee Line and the trains would run back to Stanmore.

Thus the service would run from Hammersmith to Stanmore ie Hammersmith - Paddington - Bond Street - Liverpool Street - Stratford - Canary Wharf - Waterloo - Bond Street - Baker Street - Wembley Park - Stanmore, so the route would be like the Greek letter alpha, crossing over itself at Bond Street.

This would have most the advantages of the Crossrail, and none of the disadvantages, at a fraction of ther cost, and existing proven types of stock could be used.

It would also allow more frequent services on the Paddington to Hammersmith route, at present restricted due to the capacity of the busy northern arm of the Circle Line between Paddington, Baker Street and Aldgate.

- Henry Law, BRIGHTON England

Scrap the £16bn Crossrail mess! London's coalition of residents remain concerned about the wider implications of the bottomless pit that is Crossrail. Boris Johnson continues to be a great disappointment. The City should pay for Crossrail rather than rely on Londoners to get it out of the pit it has created

- The Coalition, London UK


Add your comment



Reader Views (36)

 Add your view

Here's a sample of the latest views published.

A 'public transport' system is there to serve the needs of that public; the need for profit, though desirable, is therefore secondary. There are over 20 'service' providers in the greater London area because of privatization, this is a truly ridiculous situation. Stop wasteful advertising and 'poets of London Transport' and the plethora of give-a-way brochures and bring back the ROUTE MASTER BUSES!!! Give Londoners credit for common sense and stop making inane announcements!!!!

- Peter Jackson, London E1 0ND

The long branch of the Metropolitan Line from Paddington to Hammersmith via Ladbroke Grove could form the basis of an alternative Crossrail.

In this option, the line from Paddington to Stratford would follow the same route as the present proposal, but as a tube instead of full-size main line dimensions. At Stratford, the line would join end-on to the Jubilee Line and the trains would run back to Stanmore.

Thus the service would run from Hammersmith to Stanmore ie Hammersmith - Paddington - Bond Street - Liverpool Street - Stratford - Canary Wharf - Waterloo - Bond Street - Baker Street - Wembley Park - Stanmore, so the route would be like the Greek letter alpha, crossing over itself at Bond Street.

This would have most the advantages of the Crossrail, and none of the disadvantages, at a fraction of ther cost, and existing proven types of stock could be used.

It would also allow more frequent services on the Paddington to Hammersmith route, at present restricted due to the capacity of the busy northern arm of the Circle Line between Paddington, Baker Street and Aldgate.

- Henry Law, BRIGHTON England

Scrap the £16bn Crossrail mess! London's coalition of residents remain concerned about the wider implications of the bottomless pit that is Crossrail. Boris Johnson continues to be a great disappointment. The City should pay for Crossrail rather than rely on Londoners to get it out of the pit it has created

- The Coalition, London UK

We know the cost of everything and the value of nothing.Decades of timidity, underinvestment and cheap political expediency have made our public transport the shambles it is today.Why do we always go for short term gain and long term pain, and if you don't believe me ask the citizens of Muswell Hill who would have had a tube line to central London had it not been for blinkered cost cutting in the 1940s.

- Mick Isaacs, London

"Back in the Eighties it was way behind the Jubilee line and the then (and now) top priority, a new northeast/southwest line from Hackney to Chelsea and beyond."

According to one of Christian Wolmar's books (The Subterranean Railway I presume) the Jubilee Line was actually rated third in importance and benefits for the capital.

The top two were actually Crossrail and Chelsea/Hackney.

Why was the Jubilee Line Extension built? To help out the private sector developers of Canary Wharf...

That section of the book is a particularly fascinating read...

- Bods, Merton, London

I live and commute in London and what's desperately needed is more capacity, it needs relief from tube overcrowding. This is what Crossrail can provide. It's not a case of either or, London needs a revitalised tube and it needs teh extra seats Crossrail will provide.

- Andy, London, England

1) Chelsea and Fulham are on the tube already. 
2) Hackney is going on the tube from next year- on the East London or the Elizabeth line as I hope they'll call it.
3) Greenwich ( which he Simon is right to say isn't on the tube) wouldn't be helped one jot by a Chelsea/ Hackney line at all anyway.

- Lee Jones, London

You may be interested to know that Crossrail is this year 20 years old in that the first design contract was let in 1989. Since then it has been redesigned at least 3 times and contracts are currently going out to redesign it yet again. If (and its a big if) construction contracts are eventually let it is likely that the contractors will redesign it again - at least in part. By then the cost of the design work in total will have run to hundreds of millions of pounds if not a billion. Crossrail should be renamed Gravyrail.

- Tunneller, London

London needs fast efficient transport from West to East across London to compete with other international cities.
People need to stop thinking of immediate benefit and think long term, if people thought like this we would never have had a tube network in the first place.

- J, Berkshire

You can upgrade the Tube to get more capacity out of it - but at the cost of years of misery whilst the work takes place. Much better to build something entirely new and separate which will cause much less disruption, and which will serve the whole country. And even in a recession those new tunnels will be well-used.

Crossrail (and indeed 'Superlink') provide so many more journey oportunities which simply increasing Tube capacity would not. It will be a piece of infrastructure which will last for centuries.

- Stephen Lawrence, Cambridge, England

Ray: "Tell me who these people are that need crossrail?" 200 million passengers in the first year of Crossrail operation. These are people being taken off the existing tube network - relieving congestion and overcrowding for us all. And Crossrail will integrate seamlessly with the Tube network, increasing capacity by 10%.

Sa, London and Luke, London: Spot on! Disagree with Simon Jenkins entirely.

Yes, the costs are big, but even the most conservative estimates predict that Crossrail will offer outstanding value for money - and a legacy which our children will thank us for.

Hold your nerve Boris!

- Matthew, London

Nick: New trains - better design, faster acceleration. New signalling: more trains can operate. 
Add the two together and you get more capacity. That is why so much is being spent on new signalling so that more trains can run on the existing track.

- Paul, Kings Cross

' We should ditch Crossrail but also stop Tube upgrades, as an overused public transport shows this country is not very aspirational. Put the money into making it easier to drive around London, build more express ways and show that owning a car is something people have worked hard for and be proud of.'

Kimberley: Your village called, they want their idiot back. Drive home please....

- Nick, London, UK

Crossrail is essential for London's future and at least some of it will be built. If Boris wants to save money he should start by ditching his vanity projects. About £1bn could be saved by scrapping the 'new routemaster' (£150m+), scrapping the needless replacement of near-new bendy buses (£100m pa), not scrapping the western congestion zone (£50m+ pa), and reinstating the Venezuala deal (£30m pa). Add it all up - over the 8 year life of the Crossrail project Boris has already thrown away £5bn. And he has the nerve to talk about the 'largesse' of the previous administration!

- Paul, London

Remember the main Crossrail construction will take place between 2011 and 2017. There's plenty of time for the economy to recover and for money to be found.

As for the tube upgrade project, the recent report by the London Assembly transport committee suggested some ways to close the funding gap, the size of which is yet to be confirmed.

Boris needs to hold his nerve and find ways to keep these long term projects active. They have the potential to transform the public transport system and improve London's conpetitiveness and quality of life for decades to come.

- Kev, Bromley

The tube is overcrowded at rush hour, that is well remarked upon.

How then do you come to the conclusion that the solution lies in better signalling and new stock? We need more room to move people about. Crossrail will do this.

- David, London, United Kingdom

Excuse me, but there are many areas of London without a decent tube connection, including the busy and popular commuting areas of Muswell Hill and Highgate. A simple light rail extension in the above case would solve the problem. However, money was diverted from a proposed project in order to fund the Docklands light rail link in the 1980s, in what would appear to have been an alleged act of favouring the emerging south east of the capital. The mayor should either improve transport in London, for the sake of the Olympics if nothing else. But does he really care?

- Mark, Venice, Italy

Kimberley's comment is (unintentionally?) hilarious. We should stop funding the tube so people come in by car? 6 million cars should come into london on a daily basis should they? How much pollution would this cause? Where would they park?

- James, Vauxhall

Crossrail needs to go ahead, the South East of London is horrifically underserved in terms of public transport. The DLR extension to Woolwich was very much welcomed but crossrail is needed for the South East. Isn't it funny how the only ones against Crossrail live in areas already covered by the tube? I guess that's people though isn't it, intrinsically selfish?

- Tony Smith, SE London

Disagree with Simon Jenkins entirely. What London needs is both Tube improvements AND Crossrail. The Central Line runs at full capacity much of the day. More trains can run from the east and from the west without having to turn around at their edge of central london terminus.

So Crossrail is costing £16 billion and the Olympics £8 billion - the Olympics lasts for 3 weeks, Crossrail will last a lifetime - I know which one represents better value for money.
London has to continually evolve to maintain its status of being a great city.

- Sa, London

Boris should be congratulated on holding his nerve on Crossrail. London desperately needs to make itself attractive to future business and investors, or we'll never get out of this slump. The sooner the tunnel-borers get digging, the better - and maybe in the current climate some of the costs can be brought down. And then Crossrail 2.

- Simon, London

If you want clean, easy to install and maintain mass transport systems, then look at trolley buses, not Crossrail.

- Cap, London

Tell me who these people are that need crossrail?

- Ray, London

Is the coalition of residents a coalition of not very intelligent people? "An economical, environmental and transport mess"? And that is their description of a proposed new electric undergronud mass transit system in a dense world city with traffic that chokes its narrow streets! Cross Rail sounds like an intelligent solution that is long overdue to me; anyway it will be there being used by millions for 200 years with or without Heathrow. Instead of counting pennies to give token tax cuts to those who do not use urban mass transit systems thus polluting the city and reducing everyone's real quality of life the Mayor of London should be planning for the next major transport infrastructure, Cross Rail 2. These undergruond mass transit systems are additions to an over-capactiy underground network they are not competing forces! You need to first allieviate capacity on the underground if you want to have any hope of improving existing infrastructure. Trying to work around a live over-capacity system in engineering terms is a very costly exercise. Just look at the West Coast line upgrade for evidence of that!

- P Marsden, London UK

I've commented on this piece on my South London blog,http://southeasteleven.blogspot.com/ by making the suggestion that were Crossrail to fail, the money could be ploughed into extending the tube network across South London into Camberwell and Peckham.

- Three Wheeled One, SE11, London

Unless we're all going to go back to coal-mining, the biggest economic activity of the future will consisteven ,more than now, of information transfer in one way or another, plus the physical services that enable it. The model of shunting huge numbers of people into the same tiny spaces each day has been obsolete for a couple of decades or more, and was always something planners tried to avert. When the new towns were being planned before and after the war, nobody would have believed that the lucky residents would immediately jumnp into congested transport to get back into the Smoke. There's nothing that says financial services have to be carried out in one office antheap to get the job done; if anything the Crossrail money should be spent on upgrading the internet, which is apparently dangerously close to crashing due to undercapacity.

- Mdj E10, london uk

With the Thameslink improvements, there's honestly no further need for Crossrail and it should be cancelled asap. The job losses in the City and especially at Canary Wharf will also greatly reduce the numbers wishing to travel.

- John Buckeridge, London

The London-wide coalition of residents opposed to Crossrail agree with Simon Jenkins. The £16bn Crossrail must be killed for the sake of London residents, taxpayers and tube farepayers who will be exposed to another environmental, economic and transport mess of a kind that Boris Johnson will be responsible for should he choose to continue with this black hole of a transport scheme. Those who want Crossrail should take responsibility for it in its entirety including any costs which later need to be underwritten, pay for it with their own money and also keep the harm to the areas that want Crossrail as a transport scheme. Any takers?

- The Coalition, London UK

We should ditch Crossrail but also stop Tube upgrades, as an overused public transport shows this country is not very aspirational. Put the money into making it easier to drive around London, build more express ways and show that owning a car is something people have worked hard for and be proud of.

- Kimberley, London

Why not kill the Olympics and save the tube AND Crossrail?

- Nobby Clark, Perth, Scotland

I appreciate that these are data-free comments, but I have never understood why cross-rail as a concept got past the post. I do not doubt that it would be nice to have, but it does seem that we may be bringing Victorian Railway Technology to solve undefined 21st Century problems and paying for them with today's money....which we haven't got! In 10 year's time are we still to sit at desks in front of screens in Cornhill or Eastcheap? or even Canary Wharf? If so, if your lifestyle is dependent on such activity move to Essex or Suffolk or Kent or Surrey. Note also that from my experience the flow of traffic around the M25 is East to West in the Morning and the reverse in the evening. What use is Crossrail to these travellers. Lastly Heathrow is yesterday's accident and we cannot assume it will dominate our commercial lives in the future. My advice is leave your Mum and Dad down the Thames Valley and move East.

- Ray, London

Simon Jenkins is absolutely right, Crossrail is a white elephant already, is not needed and does not create the missing transport links that London actually needs. Nobody commenting here has actually given a good, sound reason for it to continue, only the usual nefarious rubbish about regeneration which is wholly unevidenced and which does not stand up to the most basic scrutiny.

Boris should kill off Crossrail now and spend the money on the Tube which desperately needs it.

- Matt, London, UK

Stuff Crossrail, i want a Cross Bridge. Trying to get across the river in east London is a nightmare.
A new Thames Gateway bridge is a MUST.

- Mr S.Port, London

Crossrail is vital to London, the South East, the whole UK.£36 billion in benefits to the GDP, 14,000 jobs created, many more other jobs also created as a result to service this great project.

Yes, of course invest in the existing Tube network but as well as Crossrail not at its expense.

Regeneration, modernisation and investment are a damn sight better that stagnation.

- Luke, London

We need to continue with this or it will never be done. It should be complete by the end of the next decade, just as we're coming out of the pains of debt and just when, hopefully, The City will be back on its feet again. I can see no more perfect time for this to arrive, and I believe it will provide a huge boost when it does.

- Liam Houghton, Westminster, London

Crossrail will provide new transport options, helping the city grow in new directions and relieving existing infrastructure. What will upgrading the existing network do for those large swathes of the capital without a tube service? The line won't be ready for many years - by which time the economy will have recovered and we will all be complaining about the same old capacity problems.

It's not about the City fending off the Wharf - if anything, the Wharf needs Crossrail more, since the Jubilee Line is at capacity. Crossrail is about keeping the capital moving and competing with other major cities around the world.

- Brockley Nick, London


Add your comment

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditionsmake text area biggerYou have 1500 characters left.