Friday, April 30, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! noting the latest peddling of CrossRail by the BBC. We also note - for the N'th time in the past 6 years and 3 months - that the BBC is hiding the truth about transport and is failing to show how totally irresponsible Transport for London [TfL] has been in its use as a tout for the Big Business agenda-prompted propaganda line and lie to the effect that Crossrail is 'vital' while at the same time denying fact of the huge deficit and waste in TfL that are causing the existing huge London tube infrastructure to remain unreliable and unfit for purpose in many areas...And how even a 'completed Crossrail' will NOT solve THOSE pressing transport problems in and around London.. The lying for Crossrail is being brought into sharp focus by the transport mess that is being predicted during this long Bank holiday’ weekend when people needing to use the transport system are set to experience sustained delays and frustrations….And illnesses caused by those…[To be continued]



FROM the BBC online


"

Page last updated at 16:34 GMT, Friday, 30 April 2010 17:34 UK

Maidenhead candidates debate the £16bn Crossrail bid


The scheme will connect Maidenhead in Berkshire to Shenfield, Essex
Maidenhead's parliamentary candidates have backed the Crossrail scheme, which will run through London connecting Berkshire with Essex.
The £16bn project - linking Maidenhead with the capital - is expected to be completed by 2017.
The Conservatives say they want to make sure public money is spent effectively.
The Liberal Democrats say they want to reduce taxpayer funding. Labour says it plans to finish the scheme on time, if it is re-elected.
The 72-mile route will include a link to Heathrow airport and will run through central London and out eastwards to Shenfield in Essex.
Faster journeys
Conservative candidate Theresa May told BBC Radio Berkshire: "We are absolutely clear that Crossrail is an important infrastructure project for London but obviously also for Maidenhead.
"We have got it in our manifesto, we will want to make sure the public sector money element of Crossrail is being spent effectively and properly.
"But crucially for Maidenhead we need to ensure we are going to get fast services still on the main line and I want to see fast services on Crossrail as well."
Lib Dem candidate Tony Hill told BBC Radio Berkshire: "I hope that all infrastructure projects will be looked at very carefully and will go ahead.
"Crossrail is very important - we need it because it is going to bring business to Maidenhead.
"We have got to make sure that the rail lines that go from Twyford to Maidenhead to London continue to provide fast services for all the commuters who live in the area."
Labour candidate Pat McDonald: "I think we can safely say that Crossrail will go ahead.
"Anything that makes a commuter's life easier has got to be a good thing because it can be an absolute nightmare going through the London Underground first thing in the morning.
"Anything that brings business into Maidenhead for the people of Maidenhead is a terrific idea."
Candidates announced for Maidenhead are:
Green: Peter Forbes; Lib Dem: Tony Hill; Conservative: Theresa May; Labour: Pat McDonald; British National Party: Tim Rait; UK Independence Party: Kenneth Wright.

Sunday, April 25, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! Updating the diagnosis of the corrupt agenda being slotted and promoted on the BBC for Big Business. We begin our diagnosing reporting on Tom Edwards, allegedly the BBC London’s transport reporter. We show that he is following the same Big business agenda peddling for Crossrail as his predecessor in post [as far as publicly consistently recorded] Andrew Whinelie had done before. We also examine the role being played by the Rupert Murdoch-fabricator Andrew Neil who cannot wait for public services are cuts to begin and the social breakdown to be accelerated in the UK after the scheduled Election UK on 6 May 2010. We shall expose the diabolical logic of ALL peddlers of cuts and of Crossrail! How shockingly untruthful they all are. And blatantly so! They do not care! [To be continued]on

2208 [2158] Hrs GMT 
London
Sunday 
25 April 2010. 
Editor © Muhammad Haque.

Continuing to diagnose the lying role-played by the many corruptly assigned slots on the BBC networks. This one is on ‘straight talk’. 

Nothing could be further from the straight [as universally defined, conceived and understood] than that title as associated with Andrew Neil. 


Andrew Neil’s voice reaches a high pitch as he feigns to criticise uk con party fronter [regionally adjusted! during the ‘election 2010’] Kenneth Clarke on the latter’s diffidence on spelling out the spending cuts! 

Neil is one of the ills that the BBC keeps on foisting upon the body politic. What licence payer licensed the BBC bureaucracy to engage the persistent vehicle of lies? 

What purpose does this slot serve? When was the last time that any of the four slots permanently given to Andrew Neil on the BBC broadcasting networks broke any story, uncovered any secrets and served any principle of democracy, audit and accountability in the UK? It could not do that. So why does the BBC keep him slotted? The answer must be to suppress the truth. To hide the truth. 

Like Tom Edwards has done in the past day or so in his online plug for CRASSrail. Although Edwards has not, as the ‘BBC London News’ ‘transport’ reporter [so far] committed [as in perpetrated] anything as blatantly dishonest as Andrew WhwineStonlie did for Crossrail [on the day that Rod Eddington had officially published his report on the furtive of railways in the UK], he is equally in the grip of the Big Biz touting agenda that must exert such power in setting the BBC’s news and factual propgrammes.

 [To be continued] 

KHOODEELAAR! is telling it again: You cannot trust any of the touts in post who ever promoted the Big Business agenda scam Crossrail. As has been again exposed in the case of Ruth Kelly the holder of the post at the UK DAFT before Geoff Hoon was railed in! And what a load of trash Hoon was then found to have carried in the wake of his pathetic career! Today, the Mail on Sunday [25 April 2010] publishes details of how Ruth Kelly behaved dishonestly over and in 'transferring' her 'geography' so that her children could escape the wonderful misery that most parents are condemned to accept for their children in Tower Hamlets! What a good example of Crossrail carrying benefits galore for the 'deprived East End'! KHOODEELAAR! says again: every single one of the tout in post in the past 7 years that ahs touted for Crossrail ahs been found to have been a faker, a sleaze ball, an expenses fiddler or worse. How can THESE people be treated as good sources of honest information? What basis can there be on the facts to say that only because a Ruth Kelly says Crossrail is ‘good’ so we must fund it to the tune of £Billions? What does Geoff Hoon possess, by way of morality, ethics and truthfulness, that makes him a more reliable source of judgement than the ordinary people who have to put up with the costs, the debts, the causal deprivations and the correlated denials and cuts [to NHS, schools, employment, housing] of the waste that these postholders cause as they serve Big Bossiness looting the UK public and depriving the UK public? [To be continued]

2118 [200 [1950][1930] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
25 April 2010.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
Crass role by Crassrail-peddler Ruth Kelly!  Ruth Kelly whose sluttish whisper we pointed out in our latest update of our questions to her and her co-touts for the Big Business agenda wasteful scam CrossRail only in the past 24 hours, was, of course the UK Transport Secretary when she resigned as part of the last Bliaring putsch as part of the mini-bid to oust the BLIARing ‘rival’ Gordon Brown out of No 10 Downing Street.    What a Crass role model!  How could Ruth Kelly be trusted on her sluttish whisper for CrossRail? Those cringe-making words uttered by her on camera [5 October 2007] in an even more cringe-making way than any of her contextually known and citable co-‘Bliar-Babes’ could be accused of being capable of…She was never one of the people as far as the 'most deprived’ borough Tower Hamlets was concerned. No one in the East End, unless they were in some secret arrangement or dubious deal or trade that was not an ordinary, decent way of earning a living, who was on an ordinary income, could dream of doing the things that she was doing whist still claiming to live in the same borough.  The offensive claim that she was [and probably still is] married to a former Tower Hamlets Borough Council [Bliaring] councillor was also misleading as it gave the additional false impression that she had married one of the ‘designated depriveds’. The truth was a hundred miles away from that kind of fabricated image making. Just as the Canary Wharf station – so overly hyped by the liars touting on for Big Business agenda scam CrossRail- is from the typically ordinary and neglected and deprived parts of the inner London borough of Tower Hamlets. As the truth of the ‘regeneration’ of any parts of the East End as touted by Ruth Kelly’s co-peddler, Ken Livingstone [same date, 5 October 2007] Now, the disclosure about her dishonesty and opportunism over her children’s schooling comes in the Mail on Sunday today [25 April 2010] showing her hypocrisy and her utter contempt for any standard of equality for the ordinary people. As far as she is concerned, the ordinary people can rot in their deprivation while the likes of Ruth Kelly move on and 'provide for their children'. What the likes of Ruth Kelly do and have been doing for years is to condemn the ordinary people to low standards or no standards. When she took her own children away from the 'comprehensive' schools OPTION she had in Tower Hamlets and put them in exclusive ones that ordinary Tower Hamlets parents could only dream about, Ruth Kelly showed that as a BLIARing selfish self-seeker she did not have to hide her low standards and morality free ‘life choices’. She could flaunt them and she could do so whilst still putting on a smile as she knew that neither the Bliaring regime nor the Blaring local Tower Hamlets Council corrupt controlling clique was in a position to disown her, let alone to make an example of her by publicly distancing themselves from her misconduct. Misconduct is the word we intend to use and have used. We invite her to provide us with evidence that can truthfully invalidate our use of the word that she is guilty of public misconduct.

All of that stands in sharp contrast to her other image, which the corrupt sections in the ‘mainstream’ 'media’ perpetuated for years, that she was some sort of diehard religiously dedicated Roman Catholic fanatic due to her claimed membership of the sect Opus Dei which she was reported to show in her near-fetishist wearing of a particular piece of excruciatingly painful item of sect-linked ritualistic gear!  Some have even tried to link her with very far right tendencies, such as was done in the immediate aftermath of her appointment to the post of Education Secretary by Tony Blair.

The hostile profiles of Ruth Kelly included several references to the Da Vinci Code and its portrayal of the Opus Dei as a nasty outfit involved in sinister activities.

It is our studied view that Ruth Kelly was probably so seriously targeted in THAT propaganda because of the frustration as experienced by Big Business interests which wanted to promote in Britain a whole range of experiments which the Roman Catholic faith forbids and which Ruth Kelly would not therefore support.

Ruth Kelly has behaved as an irresponsible politician. She has failed to address those allegations in public and for that she alone is to be held responsible. Not her faith. Not her Sect. Not even her husband.

Compare her silence on those allegations to her vocal as we have shown, sluttishly whispered promotion of - Yes, a Big Business scam - Crossrail! The mind seriously boggles.

Ruth Kelly has behaved as another MP or now, as a soon to become ex-MP. Grabbing and doing so ruthlessly! Irony, satire and contempt all rolled into that one recitation of her published first name!

And what a trail of moral poverty she has left behind in her once parliamentary constituency in Bolton, Lancs as well!

Ands she was asking the UK public to allow her to waste £Billions on Crossrail! She could not be trusted at all.

[To be continued]

Saturday, April 24, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! has been telling ALL peddlers, touts and assorted bag-carriers of the Big Business scams that NO SCAM, no matter how dressed up, would benefit ordinary people in the East End of London. That the only way that ordinary people would benefit would be if the local Council and others who 'sought and got elected' in the name of the people of the East End did their job and deliver the full range of services that on paper existed but in truth failed to materialise. We also told them that the Crossrail scam and the 2012 Games Hosting scam would NOT deliver anything like the hyped up bonanza that touts were claiming to the people of either Tower Hamlets or of Newham or of Hackney or of any other inner city and or deprived area London Borough [To be continued] ...



1728 Hrs GMT 
London 
Saturday 
24 April 2010. 
Editor © Muhammad Haque. 
KHOODEELAAR! told you so! And we told the Tower Hamlets Council 'full council' meeting in September 2007 so three years ago... Now, three years later,  a former Sports Editor of the BBC, Mihir Bose in effect echoes what we said about 2012 Hosting  hype and the actual waste of public money that the scam was causing.. Mihir Bose is calling the 2012 Stadium  “legacy”-linked goings on a FARCE! [To be continued].  “Mihir Bose: West Ham Olympic Stadium saga is beginning to repeat itself as farce
Tuesday, 30 March 2010
 
History may not always repeat itself first as tragedy then as farce, as Karl Marx said, but there are some very curious and interesting similarities in the latest attempt to get West Ham into the Olympic Stadium.

The tragic episode came back in 2006, so is it possible that we have now reached the stage of farce? And in the end could, as one football chairman told me, the stadium become a place where Tower Hamlets play Shoreditch Grammar School with grass growing out of the seats?

Well, let us go back to 2006 when the last serious attempt was made to make West Ham an anchor tenant for the Olympic Stadium. Richard Caborn, the then Sports Minister, was very keen on it so was Sir Robin Wales, the Mayor of Newham and so were the owners of West Ham.

Indeed Terry Brown, then chairman, saw the move to the Olympic Stadium as crucial to West Ham competing on anything like equal terms with the likes of Chelsea or Arsenal. It also formed a central plank of his desire to sell the club. And on the field of play the club faced relegation.

Out of that cocktail of possibilities the only event that actually materialised was the sale, although Sheffield United fans will forever claim that relegation would and should have happened had West Ham been prevented from paying Carlos Tevez.

The sale had its own drama with Brown and Co not selling to the Russian-born Israeli that Tevez's manager Kia Joorabchian had introduced but to a then rich Icelander. Nevertheless Brown and co still walked away with something close to a £100 million.

Four years later the club has new owners, is again facing relegation and the move to the stadium is back on the agenda. The difference is Messers David Sullivan and David Gold, now see it as crucial to the club's salvation. It is a reflection of the completely altered economic climate that a post-2012 move to Stratford is not meant to make West Ham the equal of Chelsea or Arsenal, more to ensure the club stays afloat.

Given the mess the Icelandic owners created, Sullivan and Gold can hardly hope to walk away with £100 million but are coping with clearing debts of £100 million.

Any talk of football moving to the Olympic stadium means we renew the tennis match, or to borrow Lord Coe's phrase, replay the cracked record of the future of the running track. Sullivan, soon after he completed the takeover, lobbed over the argument that it had to go which promoted a volley back from Coe, the 2012 chairman, that it had to stay.

And this view was reiterated by Baroness Ford, chair of the Olympic Park Legacy Company, in her evidence to MPs last month when she insisted that athletics could co-exist with football. Her words are worth noting, "for me premier athletics must be part of the mix because that was part of the bid commitment."



So can all this be resolved? One man who can claim to have an insight into all this is Barry Hearn, the chairman of Leyton Orient. While West Ham moving to the Olympic Stadium has been the main news, ever since the stadium was planned the default position of the Olympic authorities has been that the League One club could be the anchor tenant and help pay the costs of its upkeep.

I have been talking to Hearn and he tells me that, whatever happens, his club will not be moving to the OIympic Stadium after the 2012 Games. Hearn told me: "For three years we have been talking. Leyton Orient would have loved to have been in the Olympic stadium."

At Brisbane Road Leyton Orient can accommodate 9,000 although at present they average round 5,000. Post-2012 with a 25,000 stadium to fill Hearn felt this "would have given us capacity to grow to perhaps 24,000. But I have told the Olympic authorities we will not be moving there."

Hearn's reasons for turning the move down is simple.

"They have built the wrong stadium. In an athletics stadium the slope of the seats is different, they go up at a different angle to a football stadium. When Seb said, 'I have given my word that the running track must remain,' I said spend money on a hydraulics system, like at Stad de France where seats come forward during football to cover the track. But they did not want to spend the money. A running track kills football. In modern football proximity to players generates the atmosphere."

Hearn is absolutely scathing about what has happened. "We will have spent £500 million plus and in two years we will end up with Tower Hamlets playing Shoreditch Grammar School and grass growing out of the seats. Wonderful, well done boys."

And then, in a voice drained of any hint of sarcasm, he added: "They have built a stadium which will be completely useless after the Olympics, totally, a waste of public money, a disgrace.

"Because they don't listen to anybody, they don't think it through and they don't have common sense. Nobody has taken any responsibility."

Since Hearn turned down a move to Stratford he has closely followed the discussions West Ham are having and is convinced that for all the warm noises coming a deal with West Ham is impossible. A few days ago David Sullivan rang Hearn to tell him he was confident the talks would be successful. Hearn said: "David is a friend of mine but he does not understand the infrastructure and the details at the moment. He is a clever man and, when he does, he will realise the deal with West Ham cannot be done."

Time will tell whether Hearn is right but with Hearn’s rejection of the stadium this does mean it severely limits Baroness Ford’s options to get a workable post 2012 deal.

Options that are even more restricted as a result of Boris Johnson taking over from Ken Livingstone as the London Mayor. Back in 2005 when the cost plans for the Olympic Park were being made Ken Livingstone, essentially on the back of envelope calculations, said he would provide £10 million a year for its upkeep.Johnson was aghast when he heard about it. For him the £10 million a year for the park that Ken talked about has never made any sense.

He is much more concerned with grass roots legacy and he has ring-fenced £15 million which with matching funding is part of the £30 million pot he wants to ensure 2012 will provide a real  sporting legacy.

So where will Baroness Ford get the money for her legacy plans and will this not put her under greater pressure to do a football deal with West Ham? But how she can square it with the running track is difficult to see.

All this suggests to me that this stadium story far from being concluded has now entered its most difficult and its most unpredictable phase. If Hearn is proved right this will turn out to be a farce which will produce tears not laughter.




Mihir Bose is one of the world's most astute observers on politics in sport and, particularly, football. He formerly wrote for The Sunday Times and The Daily Telegraph and until recently was the BBC's head sports editor.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! Evidentially contextually noting a prize incident: a comment on the London Guardian web site denouncing Crossrail and Ken Livingstone. Livingstone and Crossrail are not really scrutinised on that Guardian slot. It is a grinning one dedicated to serving the ego of Ken Livingstone and peddling the agenda of Big Business elements pushing for the looting scam to be made legitimate. That slot on the Guardian web site is on the facts reserved and maintained for peddling all lies, fabrications that will reinstate the careerist Ken Livingstone to the post he still craves, in the name and at the expense of the people of London. For this reason, the slot fabricates an image of Ken Livingstone as being all things designed to help the poor and the assorted stereotyped ‘dispossessed’ people of the rest of the world. It is of course a lie and a distortion. The truth is as it always has been that Ken Livingstone only ever serves his own ego, his own career, his own personal agenda and his own ambitions. In pursuing these, he will tout for anyone that he thinks will do the job of meeting his craving for the craved objective. There is no morality in his scheme. Only opportunity and opportunism. And he is a backer of the worst stereotypes that perpetuate racism and other discrimination. Discrimination as defined universally and objectively. The following quote taken from the “grinning, peddling-for-Ken Livingstone slot on the Guardian web site” is a typical, classic piece of distortion. It is deeply racist and is an outrage to truth. Although the source of the comment may intend to criticise and expose [as objectively defined] the records and the proclivities of Ken Livingstone, the commenter gets it wrong by relying on his or her own ignorance of history, of migration, of the UK’s dependence on the rest of the world for the UK’s economic substance and social stability as he or she lumps together groups of stereotyped people as being the beneficiaries of the agenda they wrongly attributed to Ken Livingstone.



0850 Hrs GMT 
London 
Thursday 
22 April 2010. 
Editor © Muhammad Haque. 
KHOODEELAAR! Evidentially contextually noting a prize incident: a comment on the London Guardian web site denouncing Crossrail and Ken Livingstone.  Livingstone and Crossrail are not really scrutinised on that Guardian slot. It is a grinning one dedicated to serving the ego of Ken Livingstone and peddling the agenda of Big Business elements pushing for the looting scam to be made legitimate.  That slot on the Guardian web site is on the facts reserved and maintained for peddling all lies, fabrications that will reinstate the careerist Ken Livingstone to the post he still craves, in the name and at the expense of the people of London. For this reason, the slot fabricates an image of Ken Livingstone as being all things designed to help the poor and the assorted stereotyped  ‘dispossessed’ people of the rest of the world. It is of course a lie and a distortion. The truth is as it always has been that Ken Livingstone only ever serves his own ego, his own career, his own personal agenda and his own ambitions. In pursuing these, he will tout for anyone that he thinks will do the job of meeting his craving for the craved objective. There is no morality in his scheme. Only opportunity and opportunism. And he is a backer of the worst stereotypes that perpetuate racism and other discrimination. Discrimination as defined universally and objectively.  The following quote taken from the “grinning, peddling-for-Ken Livingstone slot on the Guardian web site” is a typical, classic piece of distortion. It is deeply racist and is an outrage to truth. Although the source of the comment may intend to criticise and expose [as objectively defined] the records and the proclivities of Ken Livingstone, the commenter gets it wrong by relying on his or her own ignorance of history, of migration, of the UK’s dependence on the rest of the world for the UK’s economic substance and social stability as he or she lumps together groups of stereotyped people as being the beneficiaries of the agenda they wrongly attributed to Ken Livingstone. 

[To be continued]






"



I keep telling ya, Crossrail is basically a very expensive busing scheme to try and keep white collar workers and white collar jobs in London.
Livingstone was happy to see middle class people (of all shades) leaving the capital at a rate of 170,000 per year (ONS stats based on re-registration at NHS GP practices).
And the Tories probably regard the areas inside the North and South circulars as enemy territory, so why should they give a stuff for Crossrail?
Zone 1 and 2 Ken wanted to build a trans-national city state of the poor, ambitious and dispossessed and he succeeded to a great extent. Perhaps we can now stew in our own transient, minimum wage, multicultural juices.
Incidentally, I saw that Martin Linton round my way the other day. When he loses Battersea, the seats on the western edge of the WEZ will have gone Tory...wonder why?



"

Saturday, April 17, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO before the 'LEADER' DEBASE' staged from Granada TV HQ at Manchester on Thursday. Now the unaccountable BBC is in a frenzy of its own making: to destabilise the two Parties and insert 'Ant and Deck' in a way that will neutralise any Party that wants to hold the BBC to “any degree of account”. The BBC’s controlling bureaucracy is engaged in implementing a hugely anti-democratic agenda and in its conduct is behaving just as dishonestly as Rupert Murdoch has done for decades. The BBC has been debasing debate and has been dumbing down standards in all respects. No wonder it is “excited” by the prospect of 'Ant and Deck' at the helm of British Govt post-6 May 2010.

0015 Hrs GMT
London 
Sunday 18 April 2010. 
Editor © Muhammad Haque. 

KHOODEELAAR! Told you so! We did so before the ITV Leaders’ DEBASE staged on Thursday. Now even Ian Collins, not known for universally recognisable depth of analysis, has cottoned on and described the post-debate ‘phenomenon’ as the political equivalent of ‘Ant and Deck’ show. Collins, descried by the BBC News Channel fronter Clive Myrie as the Political Commentator of Talksport radio, emphasised the point that the so-called ‘surge’ in British sephological [our word this one] installation was in fact superficial. As if Ian Collins’ rejection of the surge and the surge-promoting hype was not acute enough, his co-guest as ‘fri9nt pages reviewer’ [of the Sunday press as 'issued' from London] turned out to be a former political editor of the Rupert Murdoch Sunday Times. Being thus free from Murdoch’s ‘commands’, he too put the boot in and uttered to the effect that effectively echoed what Ian Collins had said. All this while ‘poor’ [NOT!]  Old Clive Myrie, one of the BBC’s most useful ethnic surrogates befitting the BBC’s own Obama-esque business and imperial strategy, battled on to put on the table the BBC’s scripted formula intended to make the post-Debase ‘surge’ look authentic and lasting! We had said that the DEBASE was a hyped up event and ploy. And we have now been vindicated. The BBC is operating the ‘domestic’ strategy so that neither the likes of Bern Bradshaw nor the likes of his Tory counterpart ['Shadiw'] get to be at the hearty of UK ‘elected’ ‘Government’. So a ‘surge’, any surge, away from those two would be welcome to a BBC that is bent ion remaining unaccountable. We hasten to say that neither Bradshaw nor the Tories amount to accountability. However, they do, for their own partisan and other proclivities, represent smothering almost preferable to what the BBC is prone to get up to when left to its own devices, ploys, plots and corruption. This is why our diagnosis is that the ‘Ant and Deck surge, to borrow the names from Ian Collins’ contribution, can mean only a good option for the BBC. With any luck, if "Ant and Deck" get to be in a position   to demand terms of their ‘own’ on 7 May 2010 [the scheduled day after the scheduled UK elections] then it is more likely that the BBC and their colluders will be able to influence the agenda to their own advantage than would be the case if either the Blaired party or the Ca-moroned one were in the leading posts. 

No wonder then that ‘Ant and Deck’ have been peddled furiously by the BBC since the Debase ended on Thursday. 

The BBC has found now an entrance via the opinion polls, including the cooked up one that dominates today's Mail on Sunday front-page, and it is going to maximise its exploitation to maintain the BBC’s anti-accountability agenda going. 

[To be continued] 

Thursday, April 15, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! Pointing out that the ITV 'Debase' presenter Alistair Stuart did not give any reason for his repeated preference for Nick Clegg. So what was the reason? Simple. Big Business has decided that the UK Lib Dems will deliver the BIG BUSINESS agenda 'better' than either the Bliared Party or the UK Con. This is also linked with the unstoppable and the still ‘mysterious’ promotion by the mainstream British media of Vince Cable. Neither Clegg nor Cable has ever been quizzed on their records. Far less on the records of the Lib Dems controlled Councils. Had they been, the media would quietly drop them from the platforms on which they are being now placed without any apparent reason. We have shown how Cable came unplugged in Bethnal Green on 15 October 2009 about Crossrail. Cable was ‘passionate’ in his backing for Crossrail and yet he admitted at the same time that he wasn’t even aware whether Crossrail route ‘came through’ Tower Hamlets! Clueless cable and unplugged Clegg surely will be most useful to big business MIC agenda pushers. No wonder the Big Biz media is now agog in praise of the duo, especially after the launched their 2010 manifesto confirming how savagely they will cut public services in the UK!


0315 Hrs GMT

London
Friday
16 April 2010

Editor © Muhammad Haque

KHOODEELAAR! Pointing out that the ITV 'Debase' presenter Alistair Stuart did not give any reason for his repeated preference for Nick Clegg. So what was the reason? Simple. Big Business has decided that the UK Lib Dems will deliver the  BIG BUSINESS agenda 'better' than either the Bliared Party or the UK Con. This is also linked with the unstoppable and the still ‘mysterious’ promotion by the mainstream British media of Vince Cable. Neither Clegg nor Cable has ever been quizzed on their records. Far less on the records of the Lib Dems controlled Councils. Had they been, the media would quietly drop them from the platforms on which they are being now placed without any apparent reason. We have shown how Cable came unplugged in Bethnal Green on 15 October 2009 about Crossrail. Cable was ‘passionate’ in his backing for Crossrail and yet he admitted at the same time that he wasn’t even aware whether Crossrail route ‘came through’ Tower Hamlets!  Clueless cable and unplugged Clegg surely will be most useful to big business MIC agenda pushers. No wonder the Big Biz media is now agog in praise of the duo, especially after the launched their 2010 manifesto confirming how savagely they will cut public services in the UK!

[To be continued]

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Khoodeelaar! Noting UK Lib Dems' Nick Clegg referring to 'corruption' in politics! Clegg is in cloud cuckoo land with this utterance...



1915 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
14 April 2010

Editor © Muhammad Haque



Khoodeelaar! Noting UK Lib Dems' Nick Clegg referring to 'corruption' in politics!

Does Nick Clegg know what he is uttering?
Does he know what he is letting himself in for by even mouthing the word 'corruption'?

A word that is taboo in Britain.

Taboo in British media. Oops! Taboo in the mainstream media.

Taboo in the lexicon of the BBC.

Taboo in British ‘Parliament’.

Taboo in the Palace of Ghostsminster!

We do not see any evidential basis for Nick Clegg to assume that he is being taken seriously by any objective observer of the VERY CORRUPT careerists' electoral business that is currently on.

Or indeed that he is being credible in his elaborate utterances contained in the packages now being broadcast as part of the very corrupt media circus.

So we must tell Nick Clegg that we are not impressed by his entry into the arena of pseudo ethical politics. Or moral politics.

Why?

For a start, he has got to free himself from the brainwashed idea that Vince Cable is somehow the personification of universally understood wisdom.

Cable is clueless on economics.

Yes. We are putting this on the record.

The Manifesto is manifest nonsense.

As are the other two.

The point about the UK Lib Dems is that they are flying kites.

Seasonal kites.

Like children fly them.

Kite flying is not the behaviour of a political party that either knows about corruption or is determined to behave acting against crooks.

We saw how corrupt the Lib Dems’ role in the Parliament was in 2005-2008 when the Crossrail Bill was massaged and passaged by stooged Mps and Peers who were carrying out the agenda of Big Businesses MIC.

Nick Clegg was already in the House of Commons and part of his tenure did cover the massage and the passage of The ‘CrossRail Bill’.

He ‘colluded’ with the Crossrail-passaging crooked stooged MPs and Peers!

[To be continued]

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD It so! For SIX years and two months, we have been saying it. That Big Business agenda 'Crossrail' scam destination, 'canary Wharf' was an outpost for the take-over of the inner city deprived Tower Hamlets... The peddlers of that agenda denied it. The touts of Big Biz CrossRail denied it... Now, oddly, strangely, even the REUTERS news agency, not exactly strangers to Big Business themselves, are admitting it! Historic....

 0155 Hrs GMT
London 
Wednesday 
14 April 2010. 
Editor © Muhammad Haque. 


KHOODEELAAR! TOLD It so! For SIX years and two months, we have been saying it. That Big Business agenda 'Crossrail' scam destination, 'canary Wharf' was an outpost for the take-over of the inner city deprived Tower Hamlets... The peddlers of that agenda denied it. The touts of Big Biz CrossRail denied it... Now, oddly, strangely, even the REUTERS news agency, not exactly strangers to Big Business themselves, are admitting it! Historic....






[To be continued]




Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000105 EndHTML:0000013058 StartFragment:0000001921 EndFragment:0000013022
Rich and Poor: London's tale of two cities
Clara Ferreira-Marques and Kate Holton - Analysis
LONDON
Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:36pm EDT
Related News
UPDATE 3-UK's Brown pledges reform, clashes on economy
Wed, Apr 7 2010
British parties launch month-long election campaign
Tue, Apr 6 2010
FACTBOX-Key political risks to watch in Britain
Tue, Apr 6 2010
Instant View: Uncertainty, economy loom large over UK vote
Tue, Apr 6 2010
Timeline: Highs and lows of British PM Brown
Tue, Apr 6 2010
(Reuters) - Residents of the decaying Robin Hood Gardens estate, where grimy windows punctuate concrete, prison-like corridors, say they feel no connection with those living a short walk away in the luxury Canary Riverside complex.

Most of those in and around these overcrowded east London blocks live on incomes less than half the national average.

Their nearest green space is a small hill scarred with burned litter and the remnants of a fire.

The scene is a far cry from the gleaming business hub of Canary Wharf with its gyms and minimalist restaurants, where a penthouse flat can cost over $3.04 million.

That discrepancy -- and the wider social gulf it represents -- is unlikely to pass unnoticed in the run up to Britain's May 6 general election.

The Labour party swept to power in 1997 with a promise to close the gap between rich and poor. Yet figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank indicate inequality is now higher than when Labour took office.

"It is an amazing area for all the wrong reasons," said Tim Archer, local councillor and opposition Conservative candidate for the London seat of Poplar and Limehouse, which includes both deprived Robin Hood Gardens and financial center Canary Wharf.

"We have a difference of 10 years in life expectancy within the borough. We've got huge unemployment rates, but, thanks to Canary Wharf, we also have one of the highest numbers of jobs per head. We have prosperity and deprivation cheek by jowl."

London is home to some of Britain's richest and its poorest. The city's main newspaper, the Evening Standard, ran a campaign titled "The Dispossessed" earlier this year, highlighting the plight of the capital's needy. It found that in one of the world's wealthiest cities, poor children are still being buried in mass graves.

TOUGH LONDON

London has four out of England's eight most deprived local authorities, according to official statistics.

Tower Hamlets in east London, which includes Poplar & Limehouse, is the third poorest local authority in England. Islington, spiritual home of New Labour -- the rebranded form of Labour politics that helped it to power in 1997, is eighth.

Islington shares a border with London's financial district and is known for its trendy boutiques and numerous restaurants. It was for years home to former prime minister Tony Blair.

But, the borough is deceptive. More than 40 percent of children in primary school here are defined as living in poverty and it has the highest suicide rate in England.

The problems, say residents in these boroughs, are manifold: a chronic social housing shortage, immigration, low-level crime, poor state education.

"We know that children go to youth clubs and after-school clubs and that's where they go for a meal," Kristina Glenn, the head of the Cripplegate Foundation which funds voluntary projects in Islington, told Reuters.

"The youth workers tell us that if they don't have a meal here, they're not going to eat tonight."

For many, the latest financial crisis has exacerbated the contrast between "them and us" -- prompting hand-wringing over what the opposition Conservative party calls "Broken Britain."

It has also fueled the popularity of minor parties like Respect, fronted by maverick politician George Galloway, who has capitalized on disaffection among east London's immigrant, largely Bangladeshi, population.

"The real division that counts in this borough is between the extremely rich and politicians who serve them and the rest, who are either poor or middle income, in either case struggling to get by," Galloway said in an interview, before an afternoon of hand-shaking and door-knocking at the Robin Hood estate.

This sort of complaint strikes a cord with many of London's poorest residents, who felt left out by the boom years and now say they feel the pain of rising unemployment and spending cuts.

Labour has talked down the criticism, saying crime levels have reduced, neighborhood policing has improved and unemployment remains below the levels seen in the 80s and 90s.

"When Labour came to power in 1997, there were two million homes below the decency threshold, we've now refurbished over a million, including tens of thousands in Tower Hamlets," said Jim Fitzpatrick, Limehouse Labour MP since 1997, and standing again.

But it's a tough message to sell to an electorate disaffected with politics and politicians following an expenses scandal in which many MPs were shown to be claiming for items many voters felt to be extravagant.

"There's always been this division in Islington," shopper Marion Jones said, browsing the local outdoor market. "The wealthy have got really wealthy and everyone else has just stayed the same. It's just the way it is. It'll never change."

After reading this article, people also read:
Pupils "sadistically tormented" at German monastery
Apr 12, 2010
Welcome to a humbler retail recovery
Apr 9, 2010
Creator of Java programming language leaves Oracle
Apr 12, 2010
Krankcycles: Spinning the body's other half
Apr 12, 2010
Criminals con al Qaeda with bogus nuke material
Apr 12, 2010
COMMENTS
SEE ALL COMMENTS (3)  |  POST COMMENT

Apr 12, 2010 8:31pm EDT
This is like Rio

Story_Burn Report As Abusive


Apr 13, 2010 2:57am EDT
People need jobs and a sense of worth …..capitalism is failing the common man…time for a change.

Wicki Report As Abusive


Apr 13, 2010 11:50am EDT
It has alway’s been the best.. and sometimes the only way.. to truly understand and comprehend the struggles of the working class.. The impoverished..and the those left behind in a heightened technological society is to “Become” one of these people.. and then work your way back to prosperity. The education and understanding received is wealthy beyond compare.. and you have helped.

KHOODEELAAR! challenges the latest 'journalist' to carry plugs for Big Business scam Crossrail to produce evidence-justifying Crossrail. This challenge has been published on the New Statesman magazine’s web site. They had carried a plug in their reporting of this morning’s launch of the UK Con party's Election 2010 Manifesto. They said that the UK Con party were being ambivalent on Crossrail. What they meant was that the David Cameron-fronted UK Con party ‘Election Team’ has refused to go OTT in hyping the CRASSrail scam.. And that that was taking a political gamble. They meant that Crossrail would carry votes. Khoodeelaar! rebuttal so far to the New Statesman [the London-based journal which has been often hyped because it was linked with the trendies' favourite 'historical socialist figures' of the 20th century- Sidney and Beatrice Webb] promotion of Crossrail is as follows: " Where is the evidence that in transport economics, the so-called Crossrail is the key priority? Where in any of the web sites you refer to, as backing 'Crossrail' in the context of your reference to the UK Con party’s 'Manifesto' is there any acknowledgement of the full framework of transport that must be identified, recognised and then physically put in place? In the SIX years and two months [January 2004 to date 13 April 2010] of daily examination of the contents of the propaganda by the Big Business agenda Crossrail scam-peddlers, I have not come across any of the evidence that must otherwise be present if the peddlers’ claims for CrossRail are to be believable. I am always willing to review my previous findings and assertions if compelling evidence is shown to me from the appropriate sources. Warranting an objective review of earlier conclusions. Where are those sources, if they actually exist? As of now, 1128 Hrs GMT Tuesday 13 April 2010, I have not seen or found any evidence whatsoever for the promotion of the 'Crossrail' scam. What I have found is the propensity on the part of career-seekers to throw in Crossrail as part of a package of 'PROJECTS' THEY WANT TO flaunt as constituting their 'suitability' to voters and to others in the ordinary community who are targets of the zombifying propaganda. In the UK Houses of Commons and 'Peers' in the years 2006-2008 when the 'Crossrail Bill' was being allegedly scrutinised’ the objectors, represented by my own umbrella campaign organisation Khoodeelaar! representing thousands of signatories ready to put forward clear grounds showing that 'Crossrail' was not either a priority nor the panacea that some of its post-holding touts have been peddling it to be, the 'Parliamentary' 'committees' obstructed the presentation of the evidence. And they did so quite blatantly. Their lying was put on HANSARD [the 'official' record of proceedings in the UK Parliament] of their obstructions and obfuscation. As a student of universally definable economics, I am open to resources being put to the appropriate use. Crossrail does not meet the arduously listed criteria. And I here cite Rod Eddington, who had been appointed by the Gordon Brown - Alistair Darling 'team' to look at the future of railways in the UK. As the USA business journal FORBES reported, Rod Eddington had refused to endorse Crossrail! And as if that were not telling enough, Channel 4 News in October 2007 reported that Gordon Brown had just given his backing to Crossrail AGAINST the advice of Rod Eddington. So what is your evidence for saying that the UK Con Cameron is taking a gamble by being ambivalent on the 'Crossrail' scam? What part of which London Parliamentary constituency have you in mind when you make such an unfounded claim? Muhammad Haque, Organiser, Khoodeelaar! The campaign against Big Business agenda scam Crossrail. London. UK"


1240 [1128] Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday

13 April 2010


KHOODEELAAR! challenges latest 'journalist' to carry plugs for Big Business cam Crossrail to produce evidence-justifying Crossrail. This challenge has been published on the New Statesman magazine’s web site. They had carried a plug in their reporting of this morning’s launch of the UK Con party's Election 2010 Manifesto. They said that the UK Con party were being ambivalent on Crossrail.  What they meant was that the David Cameron-fronted UK Con party ‘Election Team’ has refused to go OTT in hyping the CRASSrail scam.. And that that was taking a political gamble. They meant that Crossrail would carry votes. Khoodeelaar! rebuttal so far to the New Statesman [the London-based journal which has been often hyped because it was linked with the trendies' favourite 'historical socialist figures' of the 20th century- Sidney and Beatrice Webb] promotion of Crossrail is as follows: " Where is the evidence that in transport economics, the so-called Crossrail is the key priority? Where in any of the web sites you refer to, as backing 'Crossrail' in the context of your reference to the UK Con party’s 'Manifesto' is there any acknowledgement of the full framework of transport that must be identified, recognised and then physically put in place? In the SIX years and two months [January 2004 to date 13 April 2010] of daily examination of the contents of the propaganda by the Big Business agenda Crossrail scam-peddlers, I have not come across any of the evidence that must otherwise be present if the peddlers’ claims for CrossRail are to be believable. I am always willing to review my previous findings and assertions if compelling evidence is shown to me from the appropriate sources. Warranting an objective review of earlier conclusions. Where are those sources, if they actually exist? As of now, 1128 Hrs GMT Tuesday 13 April 2010, I have not seen or found any evidence whatsoever for the promotion of the 'Crossrail' scam. What I have found is the propensity on the part of career-seekers to throw in Crossrail as part of a package of 'PROJECTS' THEY WANT TO flaunt as constituting their 'suitability' to voters and to others in the ordinary community who are targets of the zombifying propaganda. In the UK Houses of Commons and 'Peers' in the years 2006-2008 when the 'Crossrail Bill' was being allegedly scrutinised’ the objectors, represented by my own umbrella campaign organisation Khoodeelaar! representing thousands of signatories ready to put forward clear grounds showing that 'Crossrail' was not either a priority nor the panacea that some of its post-holding touts have been peddling it to be, the 'Parliamentary' 'committees' obstructed the presentation of the evidence. And they did so quite blatantly. Their lying was put on HANSARD [the 'official' record of proceedings in the UK Parliament] of their obstructions and obfuscation. As a student of universally definable economics, I am open to resources being put to the appropriate use. Crossrail does not meet the arduously listed criteria. And I here cite Rod Eddington, who had been appointed by the Gordon Brown - Alistair Darling 'team' to look at the future of railways in the UK. As the USA business journal FORBES reported, Rod Eddington had refused to endorse Crossrail! And as if that were not telling enough, Channel 4 News in October 2007 reported that Gordon Brown had just given his backing to Crossrail AGAINST the advice of Rod Eddington. So what is your evidence for saying that the UK Con Cameron is taking a gamble by being ambivalent on the 'Crossrail' scam? What part of which London Parliamentary constituency have you in mind when you make such an unfounded claim? Muhammad Haque, Organiser, Khoodeelaar! The campaign against Big Business agenda scam Crossrail. London. UK"

Sunday, April 11, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! Telling on Sunday 11 April 2010 that all three main 'Parties' are lying. Directly and indirectly. They are faking it as they are fabricating. They are not telling the truth. As for Nick Clegg's claim that his bid to reform UK parliament had been sabotaged by the other two main Parties colluding - his word 'colluding'-is a deeply offensive outrage as it perpetrates a multiplicity of lies by Clegg. His Party is the colluder here. They have colluded in everything that is wrong about the Palace of Ghostsminster. Their collusion was offensively rampant throughout the just-dissolved UK Parliament [House of Commons – the ‘elected’ bit of it] promotion and the peddling for the Big Business agenda CRASSrail Bill.



1710 [1625] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
11 April 2010

Editor © Muhammad Haque.    

UK Lib Dems Party leader Nick Clegg is vacuous and almost farcical when he makes utterances about reforming the UK Hoses of Parliament. Why so? How so? Why first: He is vacuous because he comes across as a faker when he aims either of the two other Parties.  His words are hollow and pointless as they carry little weight as measured against the record of his Party in the last Parliament./ How: When he points the finger, as he literally did on the last broadcast occasion from the formal proceedings of the UK House of Commons, he is not at all convincing because the MPs on his side had spent the previous five years [May 2005 to April 2010] by colluding with the other two Parties. And to bring this diagnostic commentary right up to date to the minute, Norman Baker, the Lib Dems’ [transport spokesman in the House of Commons until last week’s ‘dissolution’ clearing the way for the now scheduled 06 May 2010 ‘elections’], was uttering lies in his ‘assertions’ as stated to the BBC News Channel’s Maxine Mawhinney in the past 10 minutes [in a repeat broadcast of part of the interview]. [To be continued]

khoodeelaar
! Evidentially contextually asserting at 1652gmt11apr12010 UK Con party fronter D Cameron and UK Bliared party fronter G Brown bored too
half a minute ago via web

khoodeelaar
! Evidentially contextually asserting at 1650gmt11apr12010 UK Ed Miliband delivered a very loose, banal spiel via BBC in north-east London
3 minutes ago via web

khoodeelaar
! NOTING the plethora of OTT diversions being indulged in by the perpetrators of careerism so far over the announced 06May2010 'Elections'!
6 minutes ago via web

Khoodeelaar! Stated on 14 February 2009 the following: “no to Crossrail hole agenda, no to Crossrail big business scam, no to poverty-creation plug-pit Crossrail, no to waster of public resource scam Crossrail…Khoodeelaar! Evidentially noting the persistently contradictory words, utterances, actions, decisions and behaviour, plugs and spin by Crossrail hole scam-backer, City of London bonuses-backer Boris Johnson…” we say it again today, Sunday 11 April 2010. We say it because of the perpetration of the big business agenda and its lying claims being repeated by touts in place all over the UK ‘political parties and outfits’. The manifesto of the ordinary people at this moment, just under a month before the scheduled "general elections” in the UK addressing the politicos seeking positions legitimised by ‘elections’ is this: stop lying. Stop faking. Stop deceiving. The “deception” word that has featured in the past week in the fake row between two camps of big business touts is not anywhere near the level it should be. The allegations being paraded by the two numerically biggest parties, aided and abetted by the third, the Lib Dems, are not the reflections of the truth of what is going on. What is going on? The parties are faking the whole thing. Every single one of these parties is engaged in corruption. Yes/. That word, corruption, that the alleged linguist, nick clegg, threw into the rhetorical ring and lobbed it in particular in the direction of the two bigger parties. But does Mr clegg have a clue as to what opposing corruption is, entails? Is he above corruption himself? Has he got any clues as to what most of his party fronters in the various subject areas get up to when it comes to dealing with the real merchants of corruption – the lobbyists? What transparency will Cleggie show in real life? What does he know about policies – ‘home’ and ‘abroad’ that are being promoted, peddled in the name of the UK Lib Dems party by the spokespeople in the two UK houses in the place of Ghostsminster? What is clegg’s explanation – if not justification – as to why the party’s transport spokesman in the UK House of Commons, Norman Baker, has come out as a tout for big business lobby on ‘high-speed rail’? What is the point of hs2? Why promote hs2? What sector of what intellectual rigour and activity in what area in the UK showed what evidence of what correlation between HS2 and the state of the UK economy? What are the breakdowns of the correlation? We are putting this to Nick Clegg in view of the prominent display given to his pitch in this morning’s Guardianised OBSERVER. We shall take him to task on the detailed presentation during the rest of today. And as we prepare to do so, we put this question to Nick Clegg: was it a lobbyists’ ploy to get Norman Baker to appear as the Lib Dems’ transport spokesperson’ in the UK House of Commons? Was the ‘otherwise’ ‘well respected’ ‘campaigning’ Lib Dems party MP [ex] targeted by the core of corruption at the heart of British corruption establishment so that Baker [Norman] would be neutralised and paraded as another lobby fodder in effect? What has Nick Clegg to say about the stupidity, the disconnection and the inexcusable ignorance displayed by Vince Cable on 15 October 2009 when he appeared on a Lib Dems Party stage in Bethnal Green and Bow constituency and said that he did not know whether Crossrail 'came' through the constituency? What does it say about the ‘sainted’ Vince Cable’s ‘knowledge’ of the UK economy – and of the planning in the name of the UK economy - when he made that confession in a part of his delivery containing his VERY STRONG [his words] backing for the very same CrossRail scam? What does it say about the state of awareness of the Nick Clegg-‘led’ Lib Dems Party when we ASSERT that Vince Cable’s unplugged state has not been explained nor apologised for in the SIX MONTHS since we began to report [and update regularly] that extraordinary instance of Vince Cable’s stupidity and ignorance?

0735 [ 0730] [0655] Hrs GMT  
London 
Sunday 11 April 2010. 
Editor © Muhammad Haque. 


Khoodeelaar! Stated on 14 February 2009 the following: “no to Crossrail hole agenda, no to Crossrail big business scam, no to poverty-creation plug-pit Crossrail, no to waster of public resource scam Crossrail…Khoodeelaar! Evidentially noting the persistently contradictory words, utterances, actions, decisions and behaviour, plugs and spin by Crossrail hole scam-backer, City of London bonuses-backer Boris Johnson…”  we say it again today, Sunday 11 April 2010. We say it because of the perpetration of the big business agenda and its lying claims being repeated by touts in place all over the UK ‘political parties and outfits’. The manifesto of the ordinary people at this moment, just under a month before the scheduled "general elections” in the UK addressing the politicos seeking positions legitimised by ‘elections’  is this: stop lying. Stop faking. Stop deceiving. The “deception” word that has featured in the past week in the fake row between two camps of big business touts is not anywhere near the level it should be. The allegations being paraded by the two numerically biggest parties, aided and abetted by the third, the Lib Dems, are not the reflections of the truth of what is going on. What is going on? The parties are faking the whole thing. Every single one of these parties is engaged in corruption. Yes/. That word, corruption, that the  alleged linguist, nick clegg, threw into the rhetorical ring and lobbed it in particular in the direction of the two bigger parties. But does Mr clegg have a clue as to what opposing  corruption is, entails? Is he above corruption himself? Has he got any clues as to what most of his party fronters in the various subject areas get up to when it comes to dealing with the real merchants of corruption – the lobbyists? 
What transparency will Cleggie show in real life? 
What does he know about policies – ‘home’ and ‘abroad’ that are being promoted, peddled in the name of the UK Lib Dems party by the spokespeople in the two UK houses in the place of Ghostsminster?  
What is clegg’s explanation – if not justification – as to why the party’s transport spokesman in the UK House of Commons, Norman Baker, has come out as a tout for big business lobby on ‘high-speed rail’? 
What is the point of hs2? 
Why promote hs2?  
What sector of what intellectual rigour and activity in what area in the UK showed what evidence of what correlation between HS2 and the state of the UK economy? 
What are the breakdowns of the correlation?  We are putting this to Nick Clegg in view of the prominent display given to his pitch in this morning’s Guardianised OBSERVER. We shall take him to task on the detailed presentation during the rest of today. 
And  as we prepare to do so, we put this question to Nick Clegg: was it a lobbyists’ ploy to get Norman Baker to appear as the Lib Dems’ transport spokesperson’ in the UK House of Commons? Was the ‘otherwise’ ‘well respected’ ‘campaigning’ Lib Dems party MP [ex]  targeted by the core of corruption at the heart of British corruption establishment so that Baker [Norman] would be neutralised and paraded as another lobby fodder in effect? 
What has Nick Clegg to say about the stupidity, the disconnection and the inexcusable ignorance displayed by Vince Cable on 15 October 2009 when he appeared on a Lib Dems Party stage in Bethnal Green and Bow constituency and said that he did not know whether  Crossrail 'came' through the constituency? 
What does it say about the ‘sainted’ Vince Cable’s ‘knowledge’ of the UK economy – and of the planning in the name of the UK economy -  when he made that confession in a part of his delivery containing his  VERY STRONG [his words] backing for the very same CrossRail scam? 
What does it say about the state of awareness of the Nick Clegg-‘led’ Lib Dems Party when we ASSERT that Vince Cable’s unplugged state has not been explained nor apologised for in the  SIX MONTHS since we began to report [and update regularly] that extraordinary instance of Vince Cable’s stupidity and ignorance? 


[To be continued] 

Saturday, April 10, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Crossrail-peddling Boris Johnson mocked in the Daily Telegraph! The paper that pays Boris Johnson almost £250,000 'peanuts' for Boris' name! The Telegraph writer finds Boris' obsessive peddling of Crossrail so unjustifiable that he wrote this: "We lost count of the number of times Boris called on Dave to back Crossrail. Boris kept digging the wretched thing up and bringing it in his slavering jaws to his politely disdainful master. A less self-controlled man than Dave would have got very cross and given Boris a ferocious cut across the hind quarters, which would at one blow have cost the Tories the animal lovers’ vote."

0705 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
10 April 2010

Editor © Muhammad Haque

 KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Crossrail-peddling Boris Johnson mocked in the Daily Telegraph! The paper that pays Boris Johnson almost £250,000 'peanuts' for Boris' name! The Telegraph writer finds Boris' obsessive peddling of Crossrail so unjustifiable that he wrote this:

"We lost count of the number of times Boris called on Dave to back Crossrail. Boris kept digging the wretched thing up and bringing it in his slavering jaws to his politely disdainful master. A less self-controlled man than Dave would have got very cross and given Boris a ferocious cut across the hind quarters, which would at one blow have cost the Tories the animal lovers’ vote."

[To be continued]

General Election 2010 sketch: Dave and Boris - this double act will run and run
David Cameron and Boris Johnson unveiled their electoral double act with a virtuoso display of one-upmanship.

By Andrew Gimson, Election sketch
Published: 10:29PM BST 09 Apr 2010

Conservative Party leader David Cameron, right, and London Mayor Boris Johnson, left, pose with a Chelsea Pensioner during a visit to The Royal Chelsea Hospital in London. Photo: AP
Each is determined to be one up on the other and laughter is guaranteed as Dave and Boris battle it out.
• General Election 2010: coverage in full

Related Articles
Cameron wants every city to have its own Boris Johnson
Boris Johnson wades into the NI tax debate
Boris Johnson: 'a grand would probably help me stay married'
Conservatives to give married couples a tax break
Gordon Brown pleads 'guilty' to being too serious
David Cameron admits public sector headcount will fall
Dave is the straight man in this comedy duo. His demeanour is that of a pillar of the Westminster community who is trying to get a very strong, shaggy dog to walk at heel.
Boris is the shaggy dog. No one has ever managed to train him to walk at heel and the audience knows he could at any moment bound playfully all over Dave, knocking his master to the ground and licking his face for the sheer fun of the thing.
In an act of flagrant insubordination, Boris said of the voluntary “national citizen service” for 16 year-olds, which Dave had launched only the day before: “I think it should be compulsory.”
“Come on, mayor,” Dave said, trying to close down the conversation. One of Boris’s staff afterwards offered an explanation of the mayor’s call for compulsion: “That’s a very enthusiastic way of saying it’s a great idea.”
The double act was launched in idyllic spring weather at the Royal Hospital in Chelsea, where Dave and Boris took tea with nine pensioners resplendent in their red coats.
Dave cleverly asked if the pensioners had “any questions for the mayor”, but Boris even more cleverly turned the conversation back on Dave with the words: “Now what we need to do is extort a promise from the future government.”
Boris then demanded a public assurance from Dave that if the Tories win the election they will pay for Crossrail: a stupendously expensive railway to be built under London.
We lost count of the number of times Boris called on Dave to back Crossrail. Boris kept digging the wretched thing up and bringing it in his slavering jaws to his politely disdainful master. A less self-controlled man than Dave would have got very cross and given Boris a ferocious cut across the hind quarters, which would at one blow have cost the Tories the animal lovers’ vote.
But the pensioners hurried to Dave’s aid and began a steady bombardment of Boris on the question of the 211 bus.
The mayor was told that one pensioner had been kept waiting 55 minutes for a 211. Boris kept saying sorry but the pensioner replied: “You may be sorry but what are you going to do about it?”
Boris resorted to the diversionary tactics of which he is perhaps the greatest living exponent. He said the wonderful weather was “why England is the finest country in the world to live in” and opened a debate about how many men were killed in the Charge of the Light Brigade.
At the end there was a group photo of Boris and Dave with the pensioners. This aroused Boris’s martial instincts and he cried out: “Steady the Buffs. No surrender. Fight to the last man. Lock and load.”
Our research staff inform us that the expression “Lock and load” is used by John Wayne in Sands of Iwo Jima.
Dave and Boris’s reality show will surely run and run, as the two men wage their unceasing struggle for conversational and even for political supremacy.
Boris claimed afterwards that there was “glutinous harmony” between the two of them.
We look to Boris to tell us whether there is a Greek expression that means saying something in such an absurdly exaggerated form that everyone realises you cannot be serious.

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Khoodeelaar! Told Alistair darling so. We also had told Gordon Brown so. That fakery was not on. That there was no credible basis to invoke fakery as a substitute for real responsible decisions on the economy. Micro and macro. Khoodeelaar! The campaign in defence of the inner city ‘deprived’ and deprived east london borough of tower hamlets environment and community against the impact and the effects and the implications of the big business military industrial complex agenda Crossrail scam has been arguing for six years and two months now that ‘Crossrail’ is a scam and that the scam has been crassly contrived by those who are engaged in promoting the interests of big business at the expense of the people and the ordinary environment, the economy. We have chronicled the diagnostic details contemporaneously whenever we have found evidence of the additional crassness by the crassrail contrivers. We have pointed out that the original plot to dig out a significant part of the Brick Lane London E1 area had been inserted as a result of specific bribery and corruption involving the controlling clique in Tower Hamlets Council being recruited to serve as locally sited touts for the takeover brigade of the Big Business MIC agenda. We have shown in the past six years and two months how wrong they were. We have ‘persuaded’ them to scrap the hole scam. But not without also exposing the corruption at the heart of the body politic. We have shown the unreliability of the organised [Ooops! ORCHESTRATED] political parties, the lack of understanding on the parts of those who pose as the duly elected representatives of the local community. And we have shown the shallowness of the publicly funded institutions of ‘British democracy’. We have shown that with sustained arguments and solid evidence, the local people, the local community acting without careeristic aims or similar other fraudulent motives, can expose the shallow ones and defend the community. It is on this basis that we are engaged in monitoring the latest display of election-linked peddling by the crass forces still working as the touts for Big Business plotting to delude deceive and deprive the East End of London.




0902 [0852] Hrs GMT 
London 
Thursday 
08 April 2010. 
Editor © Muhammad Haque. 

Khoodeelaar!  Told Alistair darling so. We also had told Gordon Brown so. That fakery was not on. That there was no credible basis to invoke fakery as a substitute for real responsible decisions on the economy. Micro and macro. Khoodeelaar! The campaign in defence of the inner city ‘deprived’ and deprived east london borough of tower hamlets environment and community against the impact and the effects and the implications of the big business military industrial complex agenda Crossrail scam has been arguing for six years and two months now that ‘Crossrail’ is a scam and that the scam has been crassly contrived by those who are engaged in promoting the interests of big business at the expense of the people and the ordinary environment, the economy. We have chronicled the diagnostic details contemporaneously whenever we have found evidence of the additional crassness by the crassrail contrivers. We have pointed out that the original plot to dig out a significant part of the Brick Lane London E1 area  had been inserted as a result of specific bribery and corruption involving the controlling clique in Tower Hamlets Council being recruited to serve as locally sited touts for the takeover brigade of the Big Business MIC agenda. We have shown in the past six years and two months how wrong they were. We have ‘persuaded’ them to scrap the hole scam.  But not without also exposing the corruption at the heart of the body politic. We have shown the unreliability of the organised [Ooops! ORCHESTRATED]  political parties, the lack of understanding on the parts of those who pose as the duly elected representatives of the local community. And we have shown the shallowness of the publicly funded institutions of ‘British democracy’. We have shown that with sustained arguments and solid evidence, the local people, the local community acting without careeristic aims or similar other fraudulent motives, can expose the shallow ones and defend the community. It is on this basis that we are engaged in monitoring the latest display of election-linked peddling by the crass forces still working as the touts for Big Business plotting to delude deceive and deprive the East End of London.


[To be continued]






SPECIAL REPORT: National Academy for Rail Engineers

Posted: 6th April 2010 | No Comments


Tomorrow’s railway is taking shape. This is the future Birmingham New Street.
WITH the industry facing a shortage of up to 30,000 skilled engineers, the Government has agreed to help fund the launch of a National Skills Academy for Rail Engineering, and a Tunnelling and Underground Construction Academy to be run by Crossrail.

The rail engineering academy,  NSARE, which had been strongly backed by transport secretary Andrew Adonis, will receive nearly £3 million of government investment from the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills through the Skills Funding Agency. It has the support of organisations including Network Rail, Transport for London, the Rail Freight Group, the Railway Industry Association, the Association of Train Operating Companies and the professional Institutions — IMechE, ICE and IRSE.

National Skills Academies — there are already 14 others — are led and funded by employers. The Skills Funding Agency says they work with ‘networks of training providers and employers to develop and shape innovative training solutions to meet the immediate and future needs of industry.’

Personal skills passports

A key feature of the new rail engineering academy will be the introduction of a ‘personal skills passport’ for every engineer, which will be recognized throughout the rail industry.

The £3 million from the Skills Funding Agency will match funding from within the rail industry over the next three years to get the academy established. The NSARE will not be based at a single location but will be a ‘hub and spoke’ organisation, according to Gil Howarth — former BR project director, Channel Tunnel Rail Link, and later director, major projects, with Railtrack — who led the funding bid to the former Learning and Skills Council. 

Initially, a small HQ will be established in the West Midlands — probably alongside the GoSkills’ team, which oversees the skills council for passenger transport, in Solihull.

Regional centres are planned in Derby as well as in Crewe where pop and rail entrepreneur Pete Waterman – who has argued for some time that government money should be spent on employing and training apprentices, not on funding training agencies and consultants – runs the Railway Heritage Centre and has recently taken on 20 unskilled young people.
    
A third regional centre serving London and the South East is also planned, but a location has not yet been decided.

However, in addition to the NSARE, a Tunnelling and Underground Construction Academy is to be established in east London at Ilford to be run by Crossrail. It will receive £5 million to develop new courses and qualifications, providing training for up to 1,000 people a year – including ‘at least’ 400 new apprentices, according to Crossrail chairman, Terry Morgan.

‘Steady flow of work for 30 – 40 years’ – Adonis
   
Launching the new National Skills Academy for Rail Engineering at the Institute of Mechanical Engineers, with 165 industry representatives present, the transport secretary Andrew Adonis said: “We are in an age of railway renaissance.  I have been called the ‘thin controller’ and it is my mission to ensure a steady flow of work for railway engineers for the next 30 to 40 years.”
   
He added: “After Crossrail, High Speed Two will be the next huge railway engineering project, the biggest since the Stephensons and Brunel.”
   
Lord Adonis said the £3 million from Lord Mandelson’s Department of Business, Innovation and Skills “is seedcorn funding to enable the industry to take responsibility for its training needs.”
  
He commented: “We have been very bad at investing in training in the railways, and this has been compounded by the breaking up of the industry for privatisation which meant that British Rail’s recruitment and training schemes were emasculated. We must now rebuild the training infrastructure. But it is up to the industry to make a success of it and to supply the engineers needed for the industry’s development in the next 20, 30, 40 years, and to deliver on big projects.”

Over the next four decades ‘huge‘ infrastructure work will be required on the railways, he said. 
 
“We must recreate a sense of excitement such as the Victorians had the first time around when they were building the railways.  Now we are going to rebuild the railways the second time around.”
  
But Lord Adonis was critical of the poor image the rail industry presents to the public – and to young people in particular.

“Our rail industry is still seen as yesterday’s industry, not as tomorrow’s world,” he declared. “We must enthuse a whole generation of school leavers as we re-invent railways for the next 20 to 30 years. This is the right time and we must use Crossrail and High Speed Two to enthuse them.”
  
Jeremy Candfield, the director general of the Railway Industry Association, which represents suppliers, said the British rail industry now comprised around 190,000 people – 60,000 working for train operating companies, 36,000 for Network Rail, 19,000 with London Underground and 75,000 – 40 per cent of the total – for a multiplicity of supplier companies.
   
Approximately 100,000 of the current total are professional engineers, of whom only 10,000 work on traction and rolling stock, highlighting the demise of the UK manufacturing industry.
  
In preparing the case to establish the NSARE, 75 per cent of companies in the rail industry had reported skills shortages, and research had shown 30 per cent more professional engineers are required by 2013 – only thee years away. 
  
There were also major requirements to improve the skills of the existing workforce as the railway was increasingly modernised, said Mr Candfield. 

“There are huge pressures growing on the network, as well as huge pressures to reduce unit costs,” he added. In 2006/7 investment by Network Rail, London Underground and Crossrail totalled £5.5 billion, but this was planned to rise to £8 billion by 2013/14. “Where are the skilled resources to cope with this level of activity?” he asked.

Mr Candfield said his quoted investment figures excluded rolling stock – but some large orders are expected for Thameslink and Crossrail – as well as electrification, many overseas projects which demand English-speaking engineers, and High Speed Two.

Gil Howarth, who was programme leader for the bid on behalf of the Railway Industry Association to the Skills Funding Council, said the entire rail industry was only recruiting between 200 and 300 apprentices each year – mostly by Network rail and London Underground.
  
There were around 500 companies providing training facilities – but only six colleges and universities offered any rail-based training courses.
  
“In dealing with schools, the industry has been very, very poor,” said Mr Howarth. A recent ‘Big Bang’ exhibition in Manchester aimed at attracting school leavers into engineering careers had been attended by 25,000 young people – yet not one rail industry organisation had been present, he said.   

Mr Howarth added that Network Rail has identified electrification as ‘a key problem’ for the company.  “There is an urgent need to identify the magnitude of the skills gap,” he said.

Terry Morgan, the chief executive of Crossrail, said ‘at least 400’ new apprentices would be taken on for the project, and Bombardier Transportation said that it would have 100 apprentices undergoing training in Derby, together with 20 graduate trainees, over the next four years.


Wednesday, April 7, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! confirming that we shall continue the diagnosis of UYK Lib Dems' Nick Clegg going OTT in his hyping of the alleged reform of 'politics' that he claims he ahs failed to establish because of the obstructions by Tory and 'Labour' parties. We have news for Nick Clegg. His Party's CURRENT 'poster' [in all the ways] Vince Cable is unplugged from reality.


0928 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
07 April 2010
Editor © Muhammad Haque
KHOODEELAAR! confirming that we shall continue the diagnosis of UYK Lib Dems' Nick Clegg going OTT in his hyping of the alleged reform of 'politics' that he claims he ahs failed to establish because of the  obstructions  by Tory and 'Labour' parties. We have news for Nick Clegg. His Party's CURRENT 'poster' [in all the ways] Vince Cable is unplugged from reality. We have been reporting his core fakery since 15 October 2009. However, we had been chronicling the like fakery on the parts of the ‘transport’ spokespeople on behalf of the Lib Dems Party over the period 31 January 2004 to 15 October 2009. There is consistency in the Lib Dems’ lack of link with reality. And nothing Nick Clegg says will change that evidence. What Clegg needs to do therefore is to ensure that he is himself in touch with reality and make sure that his Party is. Not as simple as Nick Clegg may think this is. 
[To be continued]

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Khoodeelaar! Told you so! That the irresponsible, fiction-mongering BBC 'news and factual' agenda was getting out of control. We have clear, solid evidential foundation for saying this. In empirical terms and as well as in objectively verifiable evidential tests. Also the evidence that we found of the BBC’s fiction-based ‘journalism and factual reporting’ during the ‘CrossRail Bill’ and its stooged, undemocratic, unaccountable, unjustified passage through a stooged Parliament is undeniably valid and is beyond question. The BBC's news and factual programmes and reporting outlets suppressed the facts of the objectors who did speak against the Crossrail Bill in the actual building called ‘the Palace of Westminster'.



2325 [2315] Hrs GMT 
London 
Tuesday 
06 April 2010. 
Editor © Muhammad Haque. 
Khoodeelaar! Told you so! That the irresponsible, fiction-mongering BBC 'news and factual' agenda was getting out of control. We have clear, solid evidential foundation for saying this. In empirical terms and as well as in objectively verifiable evidential tests. Also the evidence that we found of the BBC’s fiction-based ‘journalism and factual reporting’ during the ‘CrossRail Bill’ and its stooged, undemocratic, unaccountable, unjustified  passage through a stooged Parliament is undeniably valid and is beyond question. The BBC's  news and factual programmes and reporting outlets suppressed the facts of the objectors who did speak against the Crossrail Bill in the actual building called ‘the Palace of Westminster'. The BBC hid the fact that Alan Meale, the Mansfield MP who was the stooged chair of the  stooged ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ [2005-2008] was nothing more substantial  than a piece of plastic with no evidence that he had a politically, constitutionally,  legally engaged  brain  far less an active mind engaged in thought within a universally recognisable moral and ethical framework          Before the day was out, Jon Sopel was given an extra slot tonight [Tuesday 06 April 2010] on the BBC TV news Channel  to reinforce his ego  with a variety of trips and even had a 'guest' on opining that the Lib Dems' Vince Cable was 'thought of' in some quarters’ [he was ‘conscientious’ enough to point out!!], as a ..... Saint!  Sopel didn't challenge him to produce a shred of evidence, let alone a papal decree or validation! In substantiation of that grotesquely stupid utterance. It was clear from the utterances of the idiotic ‘correspondents’ that the  BBC was now engaged as a commentator on the colour  and the images on the sides of the Lib Dems’ ‘campaign bus’….  And it was only the first working day after the eastern holidays… nor did any of the studio guests, placed to give expert opinions on the day's peddling that Sopel had taken so central a part in perpetrating from ‘the Green’ opposite the building housing the Palace of Ghostsminster.  At this rate, the BBC will be able soon to celebrate the one achievement it has been craving for decades - the total moronisation, zombification of the viewers and listeners... The BBC's 'political editor' Nick 'itv-sick' Robinson  pronounced Vince Cable as Nick Clegg's political wife! It is on that evidence logical to wonder why the BBC bothers to  wait for any staging of any ‘election’, however hypothetical the one announced by G Brown during the day today. Why not declare a list of MPs and then appoint the cabinet complete with a suitably selected PM? All done by the BBC! And saving ‘the viewing Nation/s so much waste of the licence-paid cash’! When the ‘House of Commons’ ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ was formally ‘concluded’ and the next  stage of the stooging task passed on to the equally bogus counterparts set up in the ‘House of Peers’, the BBC broadcast a totally untruthful package and claimed that three of the Mps who had sat on the stooged Crossrail; Bill C Select Committee had done really serious arduous work! Predictably, the BBC did not cite one single objectively verifiable instance of rigorous work that the ‘CrossRail Bill Select committee’ had done or been called on to do by anyone. If the BBC was about telling the truth as known and experienced by people in the ordinary communities across the UK then ALL SELECT COMMITTEES would have to be disbanded on the ground that they were on another planet and that they were insanely suppressing and or denying all relevant and   obvious facts and that the MPs that sat as their members were in need of sustained and prolonged  EDUCATION.  So total is the disconnection between MPs and the real people. And the BBC has been playing a central part in keeping the disconnection alive… DUMMOcracy is what the BBC prefers and Dummocracy is what the BBC has helped to create in Britain. No wonder the BBC treats the election as a joke. And you can see what a farce the very idea of covering the  Election is. Just look at the gyrating displays of  Jeremy Vine and his Swingomental!  [To be continued]

Saturday, April 3, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! had told Christine Gilbert so in October 2005! That she was making up, being untruthful in backing the corrupt clique on Crossrail hole scam-attack-inviter Tower Hamlets Council. Now, almost five years later, it appears very clear, that even the Rupert Murdoch-ed Times has been able to say that Christine Gilbert was found out! Found out doing what Christine Gilbert had been doing most often! Assuring Ed Balls that she would deliver as Balls wished! Hold off that crucial report being seen by Haringey Council until Balls had the chance to see it ! [To be continued]