KHOODEELAAR! action against Crossrail hole scam: as we published on 11 August 2005

This edition has been updated at 1300 Hrs GMT on Thursday 11 August 2005

This web page is updated regularly with the news of the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole tunnel/s campaign
Brick Lane Area Against the Crossrail Shaft Tunnel/s hole/s Bill CAMPAIGN 2005

KHOODEELAAR!
THE BRICK LANE LONDON E1 AREA AGAINST CROSSRAIL HOLE BILL CAMPAIGN




Editor © Muhammad Haque


The legal disclaimer March 2005 © Muhammad Haque / CBRUK - KHOODEELAAR! 2005 This series of documents is being published both on the internet as well as on other media including in print as a wholly non-profit, non-commercial service to the cause of education across the board in the localities of the initial publication which is the East End of London UK and for the same purpose beyond the East End and beyond the UK and for the advancement of international understanding and conciliation between peoples.

For legal and constitutional; matters concerning this website, please send your main communication to lawmedia@hotmail.com

For all matters to do with the campaign against the Crossrail hole/s tunnel/s Bill, the communications should be sent to:
khoodeelar@yahoo.co.uk

______________________________________________________________________________________
Exposing the ignorance of the MPs’ who ‘spoke’ in the ‘Second Reading’ ‘debate’ staged for the CROSSRAIL BILL in the UK House of Commons on 19 July 2005 [KHOODEELAAR analysis, part 4]

There is no evidence that the cause of democracy, the cause of human rights, the cause of the voters’ rights are at the top of the priority of business that is carried out in the UK House of Commons.
This is very odd indeed. isn’t it ! after all, this same ‘House’ is often raised at the slightest excuse, to show to ‘the rest of the world’ just how wonderfully democratic the House of Commons is, how the people who vote for the ‘MPs’ are in fact UNIQUELY privileged to have been able to vote at all!
Millions of icons forming part of the brainwashing archives are in fact invoked in packaged references made by those who peddle the myth that once the House of Common s is in place, is sitting, is a reality, there is no need to worry about then people’s voice being heard !
The assumption continues:
for the ‘MPs’ ‘speak for their electors, for their constituents, even including speaking for those who did not in fact vote for the candidate/s who got declared elected MP from the given UK Parliamentary constituency at the last official election..'!
How to test if that line is a truthful one?
How else but by taking a timely look at the contents of what the MPs actually say when they open their mouth on an issue being formally ‘debated’ in the House of Commons.
For the people in the Brick Lane London E1 Area in the London borough of Tower Hamlets, the issue that has been most frequently referred to in the past 14r months in the 4K House of Commons is that of the Crossrail ‘hybrid’ Bill.
Included in the list of MPs that were able to make their 'speeches' on 19 July 2005 were a number of ‘MPs’ from constituencies along the proposed Crossrail route in London and its suburbs affected by the Crossrail plan.
Also included as a speaker in the ‘debate’ staged’ for Crossrail in the House of Commons on 19 July 2005 was Gwyneth Dunwoody, the Labour MP who has been often overrated as a role model for women in ‘British politics’ or ‘in British life’ or ‘in British history’- as usual, when it comes to a token of gender or ethnicity or something totally irrelevant to the task of telling the truth on the matter at hand - who has been allowed by Blair to remain in occupation of the tokenistic post of chair of the Transport Select committee in the House of Commons.
It is this sub committee that will be used by Blair to play the relevant procedural role in giving a relevant OK to the contents of the Crossrail Bill,thus boosting the crass project as far as the Crossrail assault plan being given the apparent legitimacy of an Act of Parliament.
[To be continued] [This file written and posted from London at 1300 Hrs GMT on Thursday 11 August 2005]





The most sinister aspect of ignorance possessed by any holder of any office in the name of the people in society is the callousness with which that ignorance is presented as if the sheer office held by the incumbent ignorant person is synonymous with some kind of heightened enlightenment.

This is precisely the’ key role’ that was played by the Lib Dims in the UK House of Commons. Before going into the details of what their spokesperson/s said in the so-called debate on 19 July 2005, it is necessary to point out that the Lib Dim ‘MP’ Simon Hughes almost singularly personifies the sinister ignoramus syndrome.
[To be continued]

The UK House of Commons 'debate’ on the Crossrail hole/s tunnel/s Bill was held non 19 July 2005. That would have taken place at least another THREE MONTHS LATER.
BUT the promoters of the Crass rail Bill, who include the main owners of the UK’s construction and tunnelling businesses, were waiting to push for a rush on the Crossrail as soon as the long flaunted London bid for the 2012 Olympic games was known.
The construction lobbies swooped and succeeded in getting an ever-pliant Tony Blair to oblige the big business interests. Blair brought forward the date for the ‘Second Reading’ of the Crossrail Bill.
The contents of what was said - and what was not said but ought to have been said- will be discussed here exclusively as part of the analytical contribution to the campaign against the Crossrail hole/s tunnels Bill.


By
Muhammad Haque
London
1340 HRS GMT
Friday
5August2005
KHOODEELAAR! Comments/responses to the MPs speeches on the Crossrail Bill dated 19 July 2005
I am writing this in preliminary response to the communication dated 27 July 2005 addressed to our campaign and sent from the Crossrail Bill Team
I shall be dealing with the contents of the Crossrail Bill Team’s communication in a later communication.
This is for the record and as part of our community's campaign of opposition to the Crossrail Hole/s Bill, as that Bill is now in its ‘post-Second Reading’ form.
The following comments are by way of our analysis ON THE RECORD of the role of the MPs in that debate on 19 July 2005 in the context of the unconstitutionality of he relevant parts of the Crossrail Bill.
We are currently studying the contents of the speeches of the MPs made on 19 July 2005.
However, we have at the time of writing, come across a number of themes running through most of the MPs speeches as recorded in HANSARD.
These include the following:-
1. THAT, overall, there already is a consensus about a need for a Crossrail line across London as set out inn the Crossrail Bill
2. That there are minor issues about the allegedly competing demands for similar services to that promised by the promoters of the Crossrail line in many of the MPs’ constituencies
3. That there is more positive benefits to be brought to most participating MPs constituencies than harm by the link
4. That there are glaring inconsistencies AND antidemocratic conduct alleged about all the relevant promoters of the Crossrail 'scheme' at all the stages including in the behaviour of the controllers of the agenda of the House of Commons on the current majority side in the House of Commons
5. That there are serious constitutional irregularities alleged against the promoters in the UK parliament of the Crossrail Bill
6. That there are specific illegalities being promoted in the Bill as well as in the speeches of the promoters of the Bill including that attributed in HANSARD to Secretary of State Alistair darling.
[To be continued]