KHOODEELAAR! evidential commentary on the stooged, zombie role being played by local councillors in London for the Crossrail scam

0758 Hrs GMT London Thursday 30 April 2009:

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the Crossrail scam agenda is a cult, is being treated as a cult and the pretence of ‘local democracy' is sick-makingly exposed as worse than that.

There is no hiding this fact from some of the utterances by Councillors behvaing like the stooges that they are of the Crossrail scam.

Just note their words.

Incredible, isn’t it.

That these crassly Crossrail-scam-complicit-Councillors are supposed to represent the local people in and of Islington.

They sound just like Rupert Bawden. Allegedly, on behalf of the people of Tower Hamlets’ !

Bawden was the crass-role-playing one [a local Councillor - although he was a stranger in more ways than can be inferred from the routine references to the ‘fact; that he was a councillor in Tower Hamlets] in the name of Tower Hamlets. He uttered idiotic words of such banal ignorance in September 2007 when Khoodeelaar! put our THEN active demands to the FOOL Council that we have had to take an extended break to allow the temptations to get distracted by those. We are evidentially, constitutionally and politically placed now to continue the dissection of Rupert Bawden miniature political irrespsosbilityw,m betrayal and treachery against the local people and community in Tower Hamlets.

We shall do so now. And as a frae of topical reference ion that we shall cite various parts from the item below that we are quoting from the Islington gazette, which is owned by the same anti-social, pro-CRASSrail trading outfit Ar****** that also owns the ‘East London Idiotiser’;.

We shall contrast the roles being played by the ‘islington Gazette’ on the one hand and by the ‘Newham Recorder’ and the ‘East London Idiotiser’ on the other.

In the SHORT term senses of the two temporal phrases


The following item is under review by KHOODEELAAR!. That item has been taken from the web site of the Islington Gazette:



"Years of noise fears after station revamp confirmed


30 April 2009


RESIDENTS have been left disappointed after losing their fight against Crossrail construction chaos.

People living close to Farringdon Station fear years of noise and upheaval after plans to transform the station were approved by Islington Council.

The station site is being substantially upgraded - so it can take longer Thameslink trains and as part of the Crossrail project to connect the mainline railways to the east and west of London. 

At a meeting, Islington councillors voted to approve the demolition of Cardinal House at the junction of Cowcross Street and Farringdon Road in Farringdon and for associated Crossrail construction to begin. 

Lawyers for Islington Council said there was very little scope for refusing the planning application or substantially changing the conditions of acceptance because the Crossrail Act had already deemed consent for the work and left local authorities virtually powerless to intervene. 

Speaking at the meeting Mike James, of Farringdon Road, said: "The demolition of Cardinal House will remove a screen from not only construction work but also from Thameslink. There will be more noise from trains themselves. This project will go on for six or seven years and will equate to around 500 days in which we will have to suffer noise levels outside European Union thresholds."

Sandy Black, also of Farringdon Road, added: "The opening of Crossrail is going to vastly increase noise, day and night, and if construction goes ahead the noise will be unbearable. With the current financial climate there is no foreseeable option for us to move elsewhere."

Councillor Martin Klute (Labour) said: "I would have thought a more robust tactic other than refusal would be to approve the proposal with conditions."

But Councillor George Allan (Liberal Democrat), who chaired the meeting, said: "We can't impose anything on Crossrail that they don't want to accept. 

"We regret their proposals, on the grounds they don't go far enough to protect the local environment and amenity, but they could reject any conditions we ask for. While I have great sympathy for the residents I don't think we have the power to instruct Crossrail in this way.