KHOODEELAAR! Putting on the record the fact that the Guardian Grin has peddled BBC's 'London Debate’, which was a farce. The Guardian Grin then failed to follow up with an examination of the empty 'Debate' that was broadcast with the VERY VAIN Jeremy Vine as the over-hyped fronter of the overly empty slot.

1100 Hrs GMT

London

Friday

17 September 2010

Editor © Muhammad Haque

KHOODEELAAR! Putting on the record the fact that the Guardian Grin has peddled BBC's 'London Debate’, which was a farce. The Guardian Grin then failed to follow up with an examination of the empty 'Debate' that was broadcast with the VERY VAIN Jeremy Vine as the over-hyped fronter of the overly empty slot.

Going on the actual contents of the Vine Vanity slot called a London debate, the question arises: is it EVER possible to examine and tell the truth about the evidence in a ‘debate’ conducted on the BBC?

And when was the last time that the BBC took any initiative of universally understood objective journalism to tell the people the truth about wasteful publicly funded agencies, scams, and decisions?

And why is the BBC satisfied with the collusion it gets from the likes of the Guardian Grin which has just peddled the Big Business lie retailed by the over-paid Crossrail-promoter as ‘transport commissioner' Peter Hendy?

Why didn’t the BBC ADD that the so-called private part of the Crossrail funding is the part that REMAINS undelivered? And that the TAXES that Boris Johnson has invented at the expense of ordinary London businesses [as opposed to BIG Business] will cost many times the base rate and will encumber those businesses for decades? Why hasn’t the BBC told the truth that it is a lie to cite £Billions and claim the sums as “economic benefit” when the Crossrail scam is still a fantasy and there is no factual basis for linking ANY sum as any benefit arising from it?

[To be continued]