Saturday, May 15, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! continuing to diagnose the Big Biz agenda lie for Crossrail that is now being uttered by their latest tout at the UK daft DfT: Phillip Hammond.



1720 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
15 May 2010

Editor © Muhammad Haque


AADHIKARonline referring here to the April 2010 NEWSNIGHT [BBC2] programme in which Phillip Hammond failed to state anything on Crossrail when Kirsty Wark did mention it pointedly.

We are asserting that Hammond’s later ‘commitment to it’ [as gleefully reported by the Crossrail lobby fronted by the London EVENING STANDARD] is proof of the stooging that is already taking place ‘within Govt’ under the unmistakable influence of the Big Business Military industrial complex lobby bent on looting the UK public of £Billions through contracts that are  flaunted as ‘plausible sounding’ banner of ‘big infrastructure  projects’.

That banner was one of the stupidest and  the most dishonest ones that were deployed by the gravely ill advised and outdated entrance of Gordon Brown into the arena of reviving  the mythological economic policy linked with the over-mythologised, over-hyped  ‘doctrine’ as attributed to John Maynard Keynes.

Who is Phillip Hammond?

Indeed!

He is [as has been for the past 3-4 days only after the Lib Dem Con party ‘deal’ began to appear to take shape in terms of UK Govt departments being allocated ‘ministers’] the holder of the post of “Secretary of State” [that is a cabinet one] for Transport at the UK’s Daft DfT!

Khoodeelaar! describes [and has described]  the UK Department for Transport as “the UK daft DfT” manly because of the daft policies that have been pursed or promoted by that Department. In our view and on the evidence, Crossrail is a most typical example of the daftness of the DfT.

We shall update on our diagnosis of the internal mis-workings and misuses and abuses of the UK DAFT DfT on a separate occasion. We shall show again with relevant contextual and evidential illustrations just how wasteful, unaccountable and anti-democratic the ‘civil service’ [!!!!!!!!!!] component as we found it installed in the DfT during six years of ‘contact’ that we had to maintain purely for reasons of evidence and constitutionality.




Why didn’t Phillip Hammond refer to CrossRail in that programme?

Was he unsure about the effect it would have in terms of the votes that were yet to be cast a week later?

Was he in doubt about the viability of Crossrail?

Just as Justine Greening had been, just as Theresa Villiers had been?

It is inconceivable that either Justine Greening or Theresa Villiers would have come out with those statements of reservation about CrossRail had there been no evidence  which the then ‘shadow Conservative cabinet’ possessed about CrossRail justifying the reservations on the scam.

It is also significant that neither Phillip Hammond nor George Osborne gave any remotely mentionable endorsement to the CrossRail scam at any time in the past three years.

Neither Osborne nor Cameron stated anything at any time in the one month run up to the Election 2010 showing any sign of evidentially justifiable confidence in the  Big Business agenda Crossrail scam.

So what is the evidence on which Phillip Hammond has uttered his version of the lie that had been uttered before him by the carious occupants at the daft UK DfT?

[To be continued]

No comments: