KHOODEELAAR! Noting the stupidity of the 'local' 'newspaper' 'East London Advertiser'. For the past almost three years, the East London IDIOTISER has published lies for Big Business CRASSrail. It has at the same time failed to publish the facts about the wasteful, debts-causing diversionary CrossRail scam. In doing so, the E L Idiotiser has given space and backing to other liars. Not one item has been published in the sinking ‘newspaper’ about the implications of the Big Business agenda on the ‘economy’ of the East End of London.

 1510 Hrs GMT

London

Thursday

25 February 2010.

Editor © Muhammad Haque.

KHOODEELAAR! Noting the stupidity of the 'local' 'newspaper' 'East London Advertiser'. For the past almost three years, the East London IDIOTISER has published lies for Big Business CRASSrail. It has at the same time failed to publish the facts about the wasteful, debts-causing diversionary CrossRail scam. In doing so, the E L Idiotiser has given space and backing to other liars. Not one item has been published in the sinking ‘newspaper’ about the implications of the Big Business agenda on the ‘economy’ of the East End of London. While the E L Idiotiser has done that, another title, located around the Isle of Dogs and representing mainly the businesses located in the part called ‘the Docklands’ has published some of the evidence of the wastefulness of CRASSrail.  This item [below] has been taken from the website of the Idiotiser where it has been appearing for the past 8 hours or so. This one [as we reproduce in texts below this commentary and updater] is in fact based on the publication of the ‘facts’ by other 'local' ‘news’ titles across London at various points in time during the past three to four months. Most of the ‘findings’ the ignorant IDIOTISER attributes to the ‘London Assembly’ have been actually published by regional titles in London and in the East of England. And Khoodeelaar! has been pointing out those facts at all relevant times.  Every time a publication to the same effects had occurred. Except the East London Idiotiser which insidiously fails to tell the truth… So why is it ‘conceding’  NOW that Crossrail is CRASS, as has been diagnosed and dissected by Khoodeelaar! for the past six years?   As for the  E L IDIOTISER’s reference to one London Assembly member moderately casting doubts on the viability of the CRASSrail scam [our words] , the IDIOTISER is stupid again,. On 15 October 2009, the same London Assembly member was ‘referred to’ in a Tower Hamlets Lib Dems’ gathering staged at the mis-named Oxford House in Derbyshire Street [off the Bethnal Green Road]. That staged event was ‘chaired’ by a strangely-wheeled out Malcolm S*********s, the ‘Editor’ of the E L Idiotiser who failed to tell ‘readers’ the truth about what he had actually chaired. At that event, the Lib Dems’ ‘Treasury’ fronter and  OTT-hyped salesman for the same ‘Party’ Vince Cable exposed his own monumental ignorance as he ‘praised’ CRASSrail in hyperbolic, superlative terms before idiotically turning right towards Malcolm S****************s and the rest of the table to ask: Does it [Crossrail] come here[Tower Hamlets where Bethnal Green, Derbyshire Street and Oxford house all are]?  How to reconcile the belated and typically moderate doubts by Caroline Pidgeon about the ‘viability of Crossrail’  with the irrational enthusiasm expressed by the unplugged Cable for CRASSrail as he had displayed on 15 October 2009? The very same V Cable whom Malcolm S**************s the ‘editor’ of the E L Idiotiser hyped to the skies as ‘Saint’ ‘Cable’  shortly after the ignorance-filled event? The Idiocy, the ignorance and the callousness of CRASSrail peddlers know no bounds. Nor does their strange ‘realisation’ that Crossrail is CRASS, after all!!!!!  [To be continued]

Unfair burden’ on London paying half Crossrail’s £16bn cost

25 February 2010

By Mike Brooke

LONDON has been 'unfairly burdened' with the costs of Crossrail on top of the way compulsory purchases of businesses and homes along the route have been handled.

That's the view from a London Assembly investigation into the funding for the £16 billion 'super tube' linking Canary Wharf and the City with Heathrow Airport.

A report by the Assembly's transport committee questions why London is forced to pay more than half the cost of a project that is estimated to generate £22bn for the Government over the next 10 years.

Eight of the 37 Crossrail stations are outside Greater London, it points out, yet only London businesses are contributing through the Mayor's supplementary business rates.

"Crossrail's initial dealings with displaced businesses and residents have been very disappointing," said Assembly transport chair Caroline Pidgeon. "Some negotiations have been poorly handled."

Her committee is critical of Crossrail's negotiations to take over premises by compulsory purchase to make way for construction work.

It also feels there is still "an element of risk" to a project of this scale in the current economic and political environment. The report calls for more details on targets for jobs for Londoners during construction and when the line is up and running.

Crossrail will expand London's overcrowded rail and Tube network capacity by 10 per cent when it opens in 2017, linking Heathrow Airport directly to the West End, City and Canary Wharf and on to Abbey Wood, with a branch from Whitechapel out to Stratford and Shenfield.

KHOODEELAAR! had told the London Assembly so for years. Six years and a month, to be exact. That Crossrail was crass. That it was daft. That it was a diversion. That it was not the priority as compared with the neglected, under funded existing malfunctioning London underground and bus networks.....

0305 [0255] GMT 

London 

Wednesday 

24 February 2010. 

Editor © Muhammad Haque.  

KHOODEELAAR! had told the London Assembly so for years. Six years and a month, to be exact. That Crossrail was crass. That it was daft. That it was a diversion. That it was not the priority as compared with the neglected, under funded existing malfunctioning London underground and bus networks.....

[To be continued]

 

 

“Londoners 'unfairly burdened' by Crossrail costs

Sarah Townsend, Regen.net, 23 February 2010

Londoners have been "unfairly burdened" with the costs of the planned Crossrail east-west rail link, according to a report.

A report by the London Assembly’s transport committee says that London would contribute £7.8 billion of a £15.9 billion funding package made available for the project, mainly through borrowing against a business rates supplement and future fares. The scale of this borrowing means Londoners will be paying for Crossrail for the next 25 years, the report said. 

It estimated that the extra tax take from new jobs, increased property levies and fare profits from the new rail link would generate a total of around £22 billion over ten years for central government as well increasing capacity on London’s rail and tube network by 10 per cent. As such, the Government is getting a "very good deal" out of Crossrail, it said. "Central government’s £8 billion contribution to the costs seems very favourable," the report added.

The report questioned why only London businesses are contributing to the cost of Crossrail through business rates, when eight of the 37 Crossrail stations are located in areas that are outside Greater London.

It also found that Crossrail’s negotiations with displaced residents whose premises are being compulsory purchased to make way for construction work had been "poorly handled". 

The report said: "We heard of 'bland, impersonal, unhelpful communication' with businesses whose livelihoods were being affected. We were disappointed in the responses we received from Crossrail to these concerns, which appeared to apportion blame to these businesses."

Caroline Pidgeon, chair of the transport committee, said: "Disruption and displacement are inevitable consequences of building a new rail link through central London, but Crossrail’s initial dealings with displaced residents have been disappointing. We hope the company has learned lessons from these early experiences."


KHOODEELAAR! Updating the evidential diagnosis of the agenda of the London ‘EVENING STANDARD'. The ‘free’ ‘local London evening newspaper’ the EVENING STANDARD has failed to publish the comment [we publish that one again here, below] that was written in response to that paper’s story on the future of the stadium at Stratford. The comment below is the ONLY one that addresses all the key issues in the matter.

1010 Hrs GMT

London

Sunday

21 February 2010

Editor © Muhammad Haque

The ‘free’ ‘local London evening newspaper’ the EVENING STANDARD has failed to publish the comment [we publish that one again here, below] that was written in response to that paper’s story on the future of the stadium at Stratford. The comment below is the ONLY one that addresses all the key issues in the matter. Logic would warrant that those issues were addressed in a comment. None of the comments actually published by the EVENING STANDARD on their [thisislondon.co.uk] website has remotely dealt with the issues. Yet the STANDARD has failed to run that comment. None of the ‘comments’ [30 in all; so far] that they DO publish is traceable, identifiable. In contrast the comments by the Khoodeelaar! Campaign organiser are. So why is the EVENING STABNDARD failing to publish the one that can be traced and identified whereas allowing traceless and unverifiable ‘comments’? Is the EVENING STANDARD bothered about the costs and the benefits of the 2012 Games hosting stadium? Does the EVENING STANDARD care about the needs of the local people in the East End of London?

[To be continued]

COMMENTING on the London EVENING STANDARD news item about 2012 Games Hosting stadium in East London and the 'plans ' of David Sullivan [and partner/s] publisher of several pornographic outlets:

Is David Sullivan the appropriate epitome of the dreamed of ‘result’ of the boastful lies Ken Livingstone had told at the expense of the East End of London when he repeatedly told David Dimbleby on the Mayor election special edition of BBC Question Time in April 2008 that he, Ken Livingstone, had lied about the 2012 Games hosting ‘London Bid’ [that ism he oversold London’s ‘appeal’ as a venue for the 2012 Games] because that was the only way to get cash into the 'deprived' East End of London? If Livingstone had not foreseen the sliding into the frame of the likes of David Sullivan then it makes him [Livingstone] worse than a liar! CRASS!  Not very progressive, is it! This disastrous ‘bid’ must put a definite end to the hype on which Livingstone has operated his own career programme for decades. He is not sound on economics. Nor indeed on democracy. The 2012 Hosting hype is now tellingly debtsful and wasteful. Time for serious thought before the next irresponsible, careeristic spin under ‘big project’ slogans.  London 0205 GMT Thursday 18 February 2010

Tessa Jowell slaps down West Ham duo over football at Olympic stadium

Matthew Beard, Sports News Correspondent
17.02.10

Ads by Google

Construction News ™

Keep updated with the London 2012 build with Construction News ™

London Olympics 2012

Loads of videos, photos and blogs.. Get involved & spread the word!

London Cooking Classes

A Fantastic Cooking Experience With Professional Chefs! Book Online Now

London 2012 Events

Cut CO2 by Event Travel Planning Stilwell Partnership - 01276 700400

Tessa Jowell today dealt a blow toWest Ham's proposed move toLondon's Olympic Stadium by insisting that the venue's primary purpose will be to host grand prix athletics.

David Gold and David Sullivan completed a takeover of the Barclays Premier Leaguestrugglers last month and immediately set about looking at ways to improve the club's finances.

The main policy of their rescue bid for the Hammers was to leave Upton Park and move to the 80,000-capacity Olympic Stadium in Stratford.

Officials say the 2012 Games must leave a legacy to athletics in east London and insist that grand prix meetings will be held at the stadium.

Mr Sullivan and Mr Gold would prefer to host matches without having an athletics track around the pitch.

Olympics minister Ms Jowell told Press Association Sport today: “Let's be clear about this. It will be a grand prix athletics stadium because we need one.

"We have made that commitment, that was one of the reasons that we bid to win the Games and so that is a given.”

The Government has set up the Olympic Park Legacy Company to decide the stadium's purpose after 2012.

Ms Jowell criticised the new owners' decision to publicly state that the club was ready to relocate to Stratford, and insisted that any move would have to be sanctioned by the committee.

She said: “I don't think you can jump from a press conference where the new owners sit down and say we'd like to move to the Olympic Stadium to how it might work.

“In order to make sure we maximise the legacy of the park, we have set up the Olympic Park Legacy Company and they will shortly be inviting bids and business plans from any business that wants to apply for a commercial stake in the stadium and if West Ham want to made a bid at that time it will be considered alongside all the others.”

Ms Jowell is in Vancouver to see how it copes with hosting the Winter Olympics. The International Olympic Committee has been criticised for awarding the Games to the city.

Warm weather led to the postponement of some events and the opening day of competition was overshadowed by the death of Georgian luger Nodar Kumaritashvili.

But Ms Jowell said: “I think that (Vancouver organising committee) VANOC have done a really wonderful job. Whatever carping there may have been in the British media, it is not reflected here.”

Canada has picked up five medals so far, and Ms Jowell hopes home advantage could bring similar success for Britain in 2012. “The home crowd effect has kicked in here,” she said.

 

Also on this topic

2012 Olympics chiefs to turn off red traffic lights Trafalgar Square holds virtual Vancouver Winter Olympics The Big Interview: Lord Coe Five Britons to watch at the Winter Olympics West Ham Olympic plan must overcome hurdles

Ads by Google

London 2012 Events

Cut CO2 by Event Travel Planning Stilwell Partnership - 01276 700400

www.stilwell-ltd.co.uk/cuttingCO2

Become a Pro Footballer

Dreaming of becoming a footballer? Looking for trials at a Pro Club?

www.getsigned-up.com

Latest IT Vacancies

Want an IT job? Visit one of UK's leading IT job boards

www.theitjobboard.co.uk

*Man Utd Car Parking*

Secure Car Parking For Man Utd 2 Min Walk, Quick Exit, £11.99

www.StadiumCarParks.co.uk

Reader views (30)

 Add your view

Lets face it...football fans are more likely to use a stadia every week and bring in money to fund the ground than one or two Athletics events that very few people care about.

I am all for other sports getting a chance to create new sporting facilities but the last thing we need is a great big open space standing empty/never used like the Dome causing us Taxpayers to lose money.

- Mark, Watford

"Football fans think they are so special and reckon they have priority over all other sports", Jose??

Wow. What an incredibly insulting generalisation, and on the football section of the site too.

As for the comments comparing England to France...

- Stu, Homeless

Typical Labour pledging tax payers money for an unloved use! Athletics stadiums all over the world loose money look at all the previous Olympic stadiums. Let's rid ourselves of these greedy fools this May. Let people who want to guarantee an economically viable future for the Stratford Stadium in and leave us poor tax payers alone.

- Bill, London

It doesn't really matter what Tessa thinks, she won't be in a position to make those sorts of decisions after the General Election in a few months...

- Paul, Philadelphia USA

I think Susan Porter has a point but who can blame Westfield? It's pretty scummy round the corner from the Olympic site,Leytonstone High Road is a 2 mile dump full of cafes and kebab shops.
Its about time East London had the kind of shops which brought money into the area so why spoil it.

- Irv Swerve, Redbridge

Good for you Tessa. They manage to play football, rugby and have a running track in France, not to mention other stadiums around the world so why not in the UK? Football fans think they are so special and reckon they have priority over all other sports. Well, after the Olympics, we will have an excellent stadium paid for by millions of people, so lets all have a slice of it. Its not as if UK plc can afford to leave the stadium just for football, an excellent sport, sadly,mostly run by people who live in the past and have little knowledge of how it should be manasged.

- Jose Luis, London SW18

Tessa who?

- Steve, England

ANother stadium waiting to sit there empty...
Shame and those footballers have to lose their pitches and these guys are wasting a great stadium.
If they can't decide 2 years from no, whats the chance they will know after the games..

- Adrian, London

She would say that wouldn't she. Right now that has to be her view, but in 2012, after the games, there will be a change of heart. Labour never never says what it means or does what it says, so West Ham should not worry too much.

- Coylum, Vancouver, Canada

Ms Jowell - you made a mistake - athletics is not a well supported sport - get real and make it a soccer or rugby stadium with other sporting facilities. Your just going down a one way street to support a previous wrong decision.

- Peter, orpington

The main point is that we don’t need Tessa’s misguided advice or meddling on the matter. Otherwise we will end up with more wasted money and another wasted opportunity to benefit the majority.

- Xtremely Worried, Britain (no longer Great)

Susan Porter - your argument doesn't stack up. Westfield at Shepherd's Bush is close to QPR (and 5 minutes from Stamford Bridge by London Overground from West Brompton)

- Blue Baby, London

Jowell, I cant wait till you and your lot leave. You spent billions on the midlands and the north, you never did anything for us in all your time in power except take our money. Why cant we have a stunning football stadium south of the Thames?

- Andy, London

Dal - I'd imagine more away fans would get to go to the games. That would mean even you could go and watch a real game. Imagine that.

- Stu, Homeless

We need a good Dog Track in London, we ain't got any now.

We also need more pie and mash shops; we have enough kebab shops already.

West Ham could share the Stadium with Millwall; and have a dog track with pie and mash restaurants etc.

Athletics could also use it in-between football games and dog racing etc.

And in the evenings, it could be used for Bingo; there are lots of old ladies in the East End looking for Bingo Halls.

Then it could also be used for Concerts, and other sporting events like boxing etc.

And if any government ever gets back to building council homes, they could knock the stadium down and build tower blocks all over it.

Who would have thought that an new Olympic Stadium was such a complex matter; its there now, so leave it there for Londoners to use, for ever, and what-ever.

- Mickinlondon, london

If its to be used puely for athletics, it will hardly get used. Better off converting it into a cinema.

Malc

- Malc, London,England

OK no problem, use it as a premium sports stadium, what maybe once or twice a year? Let West Ham have it where they will pay the rent during the winter using it once or twice a week, the rest of the time pitch some Nissan huts and let the $7000.00 a month/week subsidised renters stay there.

- David Wright, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

West Ham have stated they hope to be able to offer tickets at reasonable prices to the masses who cannot attend currently due to cost and also provide employment to many hundreds of local people. London does need a modern/all purpose athletics track but at what cost? One that stands empty for 300 or so days of the year? Lets reach a compromise and get the best value for Londoners.

- Kat, London

When were Blair Babes ever in the real world. They just get worse as they get older!

- Tel, Chelmsford Essex

Turn it into a shopping centre car park - plenty of clothes , shoes and handbag shops in Stratford - double size spaces for those big old "lets play in the city" Chelseas !
Just make sure there`s a reserved parking space for Lord Coe, though!

- Darius, London

Unless a football club takes it over it will sit empty for many years just like the dome.Funny how no one complained about Man City renting Eastlands isn't it?It would be good if West Ham were to get as it would allow youngsters/and the many thousands who currently can't afford to watch football at reasonable prices.

- Chris From Walthamstow, London,England

It's likly that they wanted to own the ground to lever better finances for the club using the ground as an asset, possibly for later sale and redevelopment.

Best possible use is either as a great rock venue / replacement for the ageing crystal palace facilities and of course the obligitory boring shopping centre.

Best use is totun the site into a factory creating tangible goods for export that can employ at least 2000 people, some hope.

- Jim, East London

The only thing the Olympic organisers are doing for the local ordinary working class people is asking them to pay for this white elephant through their taxes.

There is serious snobbery going on here, West Ham would create year round employment and bring custom to the local shops and businesses.

Luckily Jowell will be out of a job come May.

- Sandra, London

The Olympic Stadium sounds more and more like a Great White Elephant, just like the Dome was and all the other stadia in countries like Greece and China that now stand empty.
There needs to be a compromise (using novel engineering solutions - we still have the talent in this country) from both sides to ensure that this stadium is used properly.

- Tim B., Addlestone UK

It is none of Tessa Jowells business she will be long gone before the Olympics are held and the stadium is looking for customers. Keep your nose out of things that do not concern you madam !!!

- Nick Holland, glasgow

Ha ha what are West Ham going to do with a 80,000 seater stadium

- Dal, Bromley

Why haven't they spent the money upgrading Crystal Palace ...

- Flo, London, UK

They'll need to consider all offers carefully or it will end up like the Dome was for years - a monument to a political stupidity.

- Eastender, London

We have plenty of football stadiums within London, but not one decent venue for athletics, Crystal Palace is a joke. Considering debts & recession, a venue with due activities should be welcome, like the stadiums who share with rugby. Sullivan & Gold shouldn’t knock it, considering the financial problems at the pearly gates of Upton Park.

- Jack, London

I heard Westfield were opposed to West Ham taking the Olympic Stadium because they didn't want dirty great football fans wandering all over their lovely new Stratford City mall.

- Susan Porter, E3

Add your comment

Name:

Your email address will not be publishedEmail:

Town and country:

Your comment:Terms and conditionsmake text area biggerYou have 1500 characters left.

Remember me - this will save your name, location and email address for when you leave your next comment.

Email me a link to these comments.