Khoodeelaar! had said starting on Saturday 31 January 2004 when the particular campaign was started against the crossrail big business agenda scam assault on the east end of london that the scam was not an economically sound one.

0825 [0745] [0712] Hrs GMT

London 

Wednesday 

02 June 2010. 

Editor © Muhammad Haque. 

Khoodeelaar! had said starting on Saturday 31 January 2004 when the particular campaign was started against the crossrail big business agenda scam assault on the east end of london that the scam was not an economically sound one.

That was a good four years before 2008 when the big business edifices began to crumble in the city of crooks! It is nearly seven years since that day, the Saturday 31 January 2004 when the key dissection of the Crassrail agenda was stated by Khoodeelaar!

We have in the six years and five months since then carried out daily audit of the UK macro economy as well as conducting daily observation of the sectors of the economy including ‘greater London’ and  ‘inner city’ London.

We have published several thousand rebuttals and rejoinders [sometimes totalling 10 a day] to the claims by touts of Big Business peddling the CrossRail scam in the period since July 2004 when we began our online campaigning on this issue.

Yesterday’s alleged launch of the 3rd time mayor candidature by Ken Livingstone [who chose Croydon in South London as the location whence he issued his promotion of his ego] also brought another assertion by Livingstone of the lie that Crossrail was a crucial economic factor.

Or that Crossrail was a crucial factor to the ‘London economy’.

Livingstone has uttered this assertion many times in the past.

We have examined those on all major occasions. We have rejected that assertion as a lying one AT BEST!

We have reason today to put the same challenge to Ken Livingstone that we have put to him ion this over the past six years and five months: where is the evidence to support your claim for Big Business?

We warn Livingstone on the obligation under morality, ethics and constitutionality. 

Not that Livingstone has much demonstrable respect for morality or ethics, being a career egotist that he is. 

However, we have the moral obligation to the world at large to put this on the record: DO NOT go faking any evidence retrospectively, Ken Livingstone.

[To be continued]