Saturday, October 3, 2009

KHOODEELAAR! contextually reminding UK Tory 'leader' Francis Maude of pledge re Crossrail, as he told it to us in April 2006...

KHOODEELAAR! contextually reminding UK Tory 'leader' Francis Maude of pledge re Crossrail, as he told it to us in April 2006...

1535 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
03 October 2009:
Editor©Muhammad Haque.

KHOODEELAAR! contextually reminding UK Tory 'leader' Francis Maude of pledge re Crossrail, as he told it to us in April 2006...


Since we spoke to Francis Maude in Brick Lane in April 2006 about our opposition to the Crossrail hole agenda, we have published a number of updater reminders to him about the specific pledge that he gave us then of his Party’s MPs’ statements to be made in the UK House of Commons.

Those statements have not been made.

We are reminding both Francis Maude and his co-Conservative ‘leaders’ at whatever levels and shapes they may be placed in the Cameron-ed Conservative Party this weekend [Saturday 03 – Sunday 04 October 2009] [Manchester, England] [annual Tory Party jamboree and staged pretence to democracy and their version of the Brown-fronted Blairing ‘British’ ‘values’] that they owe this to not just the campaign against wasteful Crossrail scam; they do so to all the people in the country. That public resource must only be applied to a project upon that project being thoroughly evaluated and examined and found to be unquestionably necessary and justified in light of actual and sustainable need. And by taking into account the economic capacity of the country at the time.

We tell Francis Maude another thing for the records: that when he spoke to KHOODEELAAR! In April 2006 he did so against the background of at least one good hour of extensive conversation we had with one of his Party’s then candidates [at the 4 May 2006] Council elections in Tower Hamlets.

On 4 May 2006, that candidate did not get elected.

However the fact that he actually was prepared to listen to our detailed reasoning showed to us that notwithstanding previous conclusions on the Tories, we noted that behaviour and updated our conclusions and left open the conceptual possibility that they might be entitled to seek legitimacy as the alternative ‘Party’ on Tower Hamlets Council.

[To be continued]

No comments: