Friday, July 31, 2009

KHOODEELAAR! defence of the community in the East End of London: noting the 20th anniversary of the founding of CBRUK on 31 July 1989. CBRUK is the ma

KHOODEELAAR! defence of the community in the East End of London: noting the 20th anniversary of the founding of CBRUK on 31 July 1989. CBRUK is the main sponsor of KHOODEELAAR!

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

KHOODEELAAR! exposing the latest crass, idiotic claim by Crassrail peddling touts

1505 Hrs GMT

London

Wednesday

29 July 2009


When KHOODEELAAR! asked the publishers in the past 2 hours  to say what jobs they were claiming in the news item  [below], their customer relations section was unable to provide any facts.


We are on to them on this latest piece of CRASS lying for CRASSrail scam and shall be updating our findings here as soon as we have completed the investigation...



[To be  continued]



http://news.careerstructure.com/article/view/traffic-and-transport/19286370/crossrail-s-canary-wharf-station-creates-construction-jobs/

Crossrail's Canary Wharf station creates construction jobs

29/07/2009 10:38:39

Construction work is progressing well at the Crossrail station in Canary Wharf, which forms part of western Europe's largest infrastructure project. 

Those in construction jobs began work at the site on May 15th following a joint visit from the prime minister, the secretary of state for transport and the mayor of London. 

Canary Wharf station is being built below the water at the West India Docks complex.

Transport minister Sadiq Khan confirmed that Crossrail is creating and supporting "thousands" of construction jobs as well as boosting the country's economy by £20 billion. 

"Work is on schedule, with the station foundations being laid through a specialist 'Giken' piling method designed to minimise noise pollution to surrounding buildings," he commented.

The new station features independent step-free disabled access from street to platform. 

It was announced in May that the name of the station would be changed from Isle of Dogs to Canary Wharf. 

Set to open in 2017, the station will feature a large shopping centre and a park above the platforms. 

Construction Jobs in LondonADNFCR-1582-ID-19286370-ADNFCR

'In poverty-stricken East End of London, the role of the apparently democratically elected Tower Hamlets Council in creating poverty....'

 



That poverty can be created and maintained by the interests who want poverty so they can rule and control with a weakened and or weak society or social area is true in the UK inner cities. 



Over the past half century or so, the inner cities have been used as probably the most open areas for the expedients and experiments on creating poverty. 


Not just material or environmental. It has been spiritual impoverishment on a scale that would be unthinkable by anyone who has not directly lived in or at least observed the reality of poverty creation and maintenance. 


I have long argued - and have been vindicated over the past more than 30 years - that the UK society has been the subject of an unnatural assault by the enemies of humane and tolerant social environments. Those have been allowed to creep into positions of state power locally and centrally without the informed participation of the population. 


The 'left' in the UK is no longer politically active. What may appear to be 'Left' is not so. 


Closer scrutiny will show that the majority of what sued to be aligned with the former USSR has joined the natural movement, the reactionary sections of all three so called main political parties. What remains outside of those essentially conservative and reactionary 'ex-Stalinists' is not intellectually any more rigorous than it ever was. 


There is therefore the ideological poverty that has imperilled society in the inner cities. 



With the abolition of what sued to be the Labour Party, Blair has proven that what remains as the ramshackle pretence to democratic organisation can be easily switched off. 


There is no item on the Blair Party’s annual Coronation [this year scheduled to be staged in Manchester] agenda to recognise poverty as an issue at all. Not to speak of as even A Major issue. Far less as THEC major issue in domestic UK terms. 


There never has been. 


Not for almost 30 years. 


What they have is a very cruel, corrupting typically Blaring set of words that jumble up poverty and hide it under other things. Those are diversions and dissemblers 



They link it with CHILD poverty. 


And Gordon Brown is no different from Blair on this. They are blatantly lying about poverty while busily creating new poverty and marinating the old ones. 


No party or movement has shown any evidence that it recognises poverty at all as the issue to raise to a level that it deserved to be. 


The problems in African and Asia have long been the problems of deliberately created poverty. 



Without recognising those and linking the various chains together which enslave three big continents to virtual slavery to the Big Business and their local agencies, there is no freedom, let alone peace in the world. Not that the poor are going to cause disquiet as such. It is the poverty creators who want and need war and disquiet . A most avoidably terrifying world the poverty creators have created. 



In the poverty-stricken East End of London, the role of the apparently democratically elected Tower Hamlets Council in creating poverty and in disenfranchising local community is seen in all that Council’s actions. Two are Crossrail and the destruction of Council housing and the virtual transfer of public housing stock over to batches of criminals who are now engaged in finishing off the job - driving out former council tenants off from their homes and from their communities. 



Khoodeelaar! is about to start publishing the findings of our contextual investigation into the “ Tower Hopeless Council – the tool for the Blairing abolition of society in the East End “ 



Regionally in Greater London, we have a dud Assembly that is treated with hourly contempt by Ken Livingstone who is above any accountability whatever. He has been making his own 'mayoral contribution' to the creation of poverty on a scale that would have been unthinkable even on 30 April 1997. 


In the UK House of Commons, there is no democracy. So there is no debate on anything. What appears to be like a debate turns out to be faked. 


And Frank Field is , quite frankly, an ardent, almost fanatical creator of poverty. 



Internationally, the UNO is correctly discredited because of its bureaucracy. But the UNO has been disabled by the very Big Business interests who want the world to remain unsafe and insecure. And shackled to poverty in strategically created locations. 

© Muhammad Haque/ Khoodeelaar!/CBRUK/LAWMEDIA 2006 


Evidence against ''crass Crossrail scam as touted for via Bliar while in office at 10 Downing Street London SW1''...KHOODEELAAR! Action flashback



BLAIR brazenly out of steam in pushing for Crossrail hole on Brick Lane, E1

© THE AUTHOR / KHOODEELAAR / CBRUK / LAWMEDIA 2006 | 10.02.2006 18:23 | Analysis | Social Struggles | London

Tony Blair’s terrifying fantasy in Blackpool today [after the Scottish by-election disaster at Dumfrimline, Friday 10 February 2006] echoing the equally chilling Margaret Hilda Roberts’s diabolically hypocritical invocation of Francis of Assisi cannot conceal the emptiness immorality and soullessness that dominate Blair’s agenda of piling deprivation on the already deprived and adding violations on the already violated. Nowhere can that agenda be found to be as wantonly on display as in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, which is being politically decimated by an overly Blairite cabal of sub-democratic touts bent on selling the East End to Big Business and their co-looters travelling in the Crossrail bandwagon towards looting the public purse of £20 billion as their class, coterie and kind had been allowed to do on a smaller scale of a mere £1 billion over the Millennium Dome. The East End is agog with anger against this Blairing Crossrail hole attack. 

KHOODEELAAR! is the grassroots voice of that anger that the people of the East End feel at the prospect of the Crossrail planned hole right through the moist deprived part of the inner city London. Transport Secretary Alistair Darling has been told today to stop the Crossrail hole plan altogether without delay. 



10 February 2006-02-10 




Dear Alistair, 




Thank you for your Departmental reply I accessed a minute ago today [1700 hrs GMT Friday 10 February 2006]. 




if you are to be treated as credible in your response - and equally importantly, if the local community is to be expected to treat with any credibility the clams to the effect that the tower hamlets council has been representing the community’s opposition to the crossrail hole plan-scheme bill truthfully, entirely and adequately to your department and to the houses of parliament then you must let me have the evidence to support any suggestion that tower hamlets council has been telling the truth, and nothing but the truth about the matter. 




You will recall my questions to you as far back as the first quarter of 2004. 




Those have been copied to Gordon Brown as they have been to Tony Blair as well. 




Your DEPARTMENT will also have on their files my letters since the first quarter of 2004 which have been mainly to demand from your DEPARTMENT unequivocal and unadulterated evidence to support every single claim that your DEPARTMENT has relayed to me on behalf of or about the role of the controlling elements in the London borough of tower hamlets council. 




I have also stressed in more than one of my communications and interrogatives to you the fact that you are a lawyer. I have done that for a very good constitutional reason. I have done that to draw your attention to the constitutional duty that you have to tell the truth about your own role in office. 




That role in so far as it relates to the promotion of the crassly conceived CROSSRAIL hole attacks on the BRICK LANE LONDON E1 area is a role you must reflect on very carefully whether or not you take another 3 weeks before responding to this communication. 




I have earlier today published on the khoodeelaar! Website  http://www.khoodeelaar.com 


the first parts of my own critique of the elements that in my knowledge have sunk the LABOUR PARTY POLITICALLY IN THE EAST END OF LONDON. 




I have started to publish my thoughts in the context of the mounting evidence which I see before me. 




That evidence has been sufficient for me to say that unless the crossrail hole attacks on the east end are halted and withdrawn from the crossrail bill without any further delay, the labour party will be dealt another democratic rebuff in tower hamlets in the scheduled may elections. 




I am not convinced that the elements that have brought the EAST END borough to the CROSSRAIL-HOLE CRISIS are at all bothered about the welfare of the people in the borough. 




Are you bothered about the people in TOWER HAMLETS, ALISTAIR? 




If you are then you must show by your action that you really are. 




You must let me have the answers to the questions which I have been putting to Christine Gilbert, the CHIEF EXECUTIVE IN TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL. You must get me the answers from the controlling clique of councillors on TOWER HAMLETS council whom I have been asking questions about every conceivable constitutional aspect of their clandestine collusion with the calamitous crossrail hole plan. 




Yours sincerely 




Muhammad Haque 

Chair 

CBRUK 

And organiser 


Khoodeelaar! 


The BRICK LANE LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL HOLE -PLAN SCHEME - BILL, 2006 


© THE AUTHOR / KHOODEELAAR / CBRUK / LAWMEDIA 2006 


e-mail: lawmedia@hotmail.com 

Download this article in pdf format >>

Email this article to someone >>

Submit an addition or make a quick comment on this article >>

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

Crassness of Crossrail adventure admitted even by 'academic' pluggers of the plo

10.02.2006 20:03


The London met 'university' - created by amalgamating the former polytechnic of north London and its counterpart the city of London, is an avid plugger of all manner of big business rubbish at the expense of the inner city populations. It is therefore significant that even the 'Londoner' 'university' is unsure about the crass project. 


Here is a sample, that the Bethnal green and bow democratic forum against crossrail hole attack bill spotted on Friday 10 February 2006 




 http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:J4D1W3HbclAJ:www.londonmet.ac.uk/services/london-office/local-issues/crossrail.cfm+Crossrail&hl=en&gl=uk&ct=clnk&cd=41 


The proposed route 

Crossrail will link Maidenhead and Heathrow to the West of London with Shenfield in the East and Abbey Wood in the South East, providing access through the capital for suburban rail services and a major link from Heathrow to the city centre. It will include a new tunnelled section through Central London with sub-surface stations at Paddington, Bond Street, Tottenham Court Road, Farringdon, Liverpool Street, Whitechapel and the Isle of Dogs. 

Timetable for completion 


Only Crossrail Line 1 has so far been given the provisional go-ahead by the Government with the introduction of the hybrid Crossrail Bill into Parliament in February 2005. 


On Tuesday 19th July. Crossrail successfully passed its second reading. The House of Commons debate outlined Crossrail's economic importance for London and the UK and received all round party support. If approved, construction of the Crossrail project is likely to take six to seven years. 

However, the key issue of funding still remains unresolved. It is estimated that the scheme will cost between £10-15 billion, which will be met by a combination of public and private finances. However, the government has deferred a decision on the exact funding mx until the completion of the Lyons review into local government funding, now delayed until late 2006. 

There are also plans for a second Crossrail line linking up rail services from the north east to the south west. There would be a new tunnelled section linking Kings Cross to Victoria with an interchange with the first Crossrail Line at Tottenham Court Road. However, the route, stations and the finance of the second Crossrail line are still unclear and the plans for it to be in operation by 2016 seem optimistic given the difficulties already encountered by Crossrail. 

BGBcache 


file edited by KHOODEELAAR at 1030 Hrs GMT Saturday 11 February 2006

11.02.2006 10:41




Introduction to the file edited by KHOODEELAAR at 1030 Hrs GMT Saturday 11 February 2006- 


Tony Blair’s terrifying fantasy in Blackpool on Friday 10 February 2006 [after the Scottish by-election disaster encountered by the Blaired Labour Party candidate at dumfirmline, Friday 10 February 2006] echoing the equally chilling Margaret Hilda Roberts’s diabolically hypocritical invocation of Francis of Assisi cannot conceal the emptiness immorality and soullessness that dominate Blair’s agenda of piling deprivation on the already deprived and adding violations on the already violated. nowhere can that agenda be found to be as wantonly on display as in the london borough of tower hamlets, which is being politically decimated by an overly Blairite cabal of sub-democratic touts bent on selling the east end to big business and their co-looters travelling in the crossrail bandwagon towards looting the public purse of £20 billion as their class, coterie and kind had been allowed to do on a smaller scale of a mere £1 billion over the millennium dome. The east end is agog with anger against this Blairing crossrail hole attack. 


KHOODEELAAR! is the grassroots voice of that anger that the people of the EAST END feel at the prospect of the CROSSRAIL planned hole right through the most deprived part of the inner city LONDON. 


UK transport secretary [Cabinet Minister for Transport] ALISTAIR DARLING [who doubles also as the Scottish Secretary in Tony Blair’s cabinet] has been told today to stop the CROSSRAIL hole plan altogether without delay. 


The Khoodeelaar LETTER TO Alistair Darling published here on 10 February 2006 refers to the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council. 


That aspect will be discussed fully by KHOODEELAAR! On their web site  http://www.khoodeelaar.com at 1800 Hrs GMT 11 February 2006 [at the latest] 

© The Author / khoodeelaar/ CBRUK/ Lawmedia 2006
 Homepage: http://www.khoodeelaar.com


Crossrail hole Bill poses additional health risks to Brick Lane area

11.02.2006 16:01

© The Author / KHOODEELAAR / CBRUK /LAWMEDIA 2006 


Eid Mubarak! 


Wishing a very happy Eid to everyone in the Brick Lane London E1 Area. The people in the Brick Lane Area deserve a very peaceful and happy Eid. 



And we wish the community a similarly peaceful and happy Eid al Fitr in a year’s time. … We hope that in the meantime, we can all unite to stop the local Tower Hamlets council allowing the Crossrail hole Bill plan… We have for the past 22 months defended the community’s right to remain free from additional deprivation and bad health that Crossrail hole plan will cause to the Brick Lane area. We are sure that with the local community getting united ton defend our health, our livelihoods ands our children’s health we can stop the Crossrail hole Bill… We wish the entire children ion the Brick Lane area a very happy and pollution-free week of Eid that starts in a day or so so… 


All in the KHOODEELAAR! CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE Crossrail hole Bill in the Brick Lane London E1 Area. 


Tuesday 1 November 2005 

© The Author / KHOODEELAAR / CBRUK /LAWMEDIA 2006
 e-mail: lawmedia@hotmail.com 

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Crossrail is NOT the objectively assessed transport economic priority for London

0540 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 29 July 2009:

By © Muhammad Haque

KHOODEELAAR! Telling the increasingly desperate touts of Big Business crassly conceived, crassly peddled and crassly passage through UK Parliament of Ghosts CRASSrail scam that it is NOT sustainable economically… that Crossrail is NOT the objectively assessed transport economic priority for or in or around London; that the scam is bound to fail the main tests: that is need and affordability and the socio economic equilibrium…. that the peddlers and touts who are still engaged in flogging the ‘case’ for the crass Crossrail are doing their flogging against all objective evidence…logic…reason.. rationale….

That every time a scripted ‘message’ is delivered by a selected, token stooge and Big Business contrived tout, it fails to carry conviction. That the dire pretensions of Boris Johnson – who is getting attention for and to all the wrong parts, spanning the spectrum of known permutations of contemporary meaning – are fast moving to the point of convergence with the caricatures of him that were devised and diffused during the months leading up to 1 May 2008.

That Boris Johnson’s appointment of a number of ‘ethnic surrogates’ has been at once unoriginal [he apes the original corrupter of London in contemporary times, Ken Livingstone there] and an insult to all self-respecting people in London and by extension of the images via the BBC of the UK and beyond.

That both Boris Johnson and Gordon Brown should be seen and observed as they engage in their thinly credible bids to make Crossrail acceptable in the context of the rising mountain of public debts that Brown has imprudently created does not augur well for a rigorous, accountable, responsible and caring society in Britain…..

BOTH Boris Johnson and Gordon Brown have been exposed as lacking in substance when and where it comes to economic policy and conduct in the context of their peddling the Big Business agenda as typified in and by CRASSrail…

BOTH Gordon Brown and Boris Johnson have been seen as tools of the City of London vested interests who are themselves engaged in pushing for the Military Industrial Complex’s agenda by their daily lies overstating the importance of City fraudsters to ‘the economy’ … the very elements and their propellers behind the scenes and physically located away from the over-hyped Square Mile who are known to be engaged in the unremitting looting of the public by one means or another…..

If Gordon Brown is seen as a liability at Norwich North by-election, how can the same Gordon Brown be given the opposite treatment when it comes to his role as an agent for the agenda of Big Business looters ?

This is only one of literally dozens of contradictions that we have been alluding to over the past two years…

We say this in the context of the evidence that that electorally, it was possible to neutralsie Ken Livingstone…


Until 1 May 2008, it was not accepted by either Livingstone himself or by his colluders on the Guardian and via the other parts of the Blaired media that Livingstone was susceptible to being rejected by voters and as 'not the democratic choice of the people of London'…

Now that Livingstone has been exposed as being unworthy of the votes, however those votes may be counted and interpreted; it follows that his utterances should be examined with greater scrutiny than they have been treated up to now…

And we could not start with a more appropriate item: CRASSrail.

Ken Livingstone has played a crass role in peddling CRASSrail scam..

And this became clear last week when he gave an alleged interview to one of his fading fanzines… In it, Livingstone ON THE RECORD appeared to chide Boris Johnson’s ‘record’ in ‘power’ at *****y Hall in London SE1. But the most important bit of joke was in Livingstone’s ‘rationale’.

He gave AS PUBLISHED, the real reason for ‘supporting’ Crossrail: the ‘businesses’!

What businesses was Livingstone referring to there? Not the businesses that have been up in arms against the Section 106 Crossrail levy, surely! Ken Livingstone is a fantasists and he knows it.

The only problem is that he has sold his image as a realist for far too long. And the gap between his fantasist reality and the real world is still not visible from the idiotic towers on which some of the Guardian’s most prejudiced, dim, ignorant peddlers STILL [!!!!!] ‘file their blogs’ for Ken Livingstone….. [To be continued]

Monday, July 27, 2009

KHOODEELAAR! Evidential, analytical updates showing why ''London Crossrail is a crass scam'', are accessible on twitter

0515 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 28 July 2009:

KHOODEELAAR! Evidential, analytical updates showing why London Crossrail is a crass scam are accessible on twitter

Saturday, July 25, 2009

Khoodeelaar! CAMPAIGN organiser Muhammad Haque is telling the London DAILY TELEGRAPH..


Muhammad Haque s comment published on the Daily Telegraph web site timed at 2014 Hrs UK time

Saturday 25 july 2009:



It is in the constitution that events overtake events. 


I have just coined an updated observation! So this years publishing event by the Daily Telegraph Group will become a thing of the past. Event will come along to make certain that it is. However, there is no indication that either MPs and peers or the media generally and including the Daily Telegraph group will deliver a significantly improved quality of service to the public. Why do I say this? For one thing, the Daily Telegraph as ceased its fervour. And relapsed into Party political mode. As the house journal for one of the two main Parties. And secondly, the sheer brazen irrationality and Partisanship in the piece by Matthew D'Ancona. Where is the evidence to justify his fanatic almost worryingly zealous dislike of one Party? If the evidence of the published response of the ordinary public to the behaviour of MPs and peers as temporarily chronicled by the Daily Telegraph this year is any guide then the public are as disgusted about one Party as they are about another. Which rationally should cause the likes of Matthew D'Ancona to stop being vehicles of Party political agenda and start themselves reporting on what the people are saying now. The people in the streets of East London that I see are not impressed by any of the power-wielding Parties. Nor are they impressed by those Parties local fodder and touts. The people are deeply unimpressed and do not expect much to change for the better with the political careerists and their media hangers on remaining bent on furthering their own petty and undignified gains and ends while neglecting the needs and the priorities of the country and the public. If the accounts are accurate as published so far on both the BBC [on Friday night 24 July 2009, through the mouth of John Torode, also from the same Spectator that Matthew D'Ancona Edits and as stated on the front-page of todays DAILY MAIL] about the cause behind the announcement that Andrew McKinley is so disgusted by the timidity of his fellow Party MPs that he is quitting Parliament then that reinforces the analysis that I have made of the UK Parliament and politics for decades. 


Which is that the UK parliament is effectively a decoration. 


And that the UK public are regularly taken for rides by the given regimes [in chronological order]. Look as far back as objectively verifiably independent and accurate records will allow and you will find that the claim of accountable democracy about the Parliament in Britain is a most misleading one. It does NOT exist. Which means that Matthew D'Ancona’s attaching of so much importance to the Norwich by-election is indicative of his lack of grasp of the realities of British political mess. By comparison, even Amanda Plattel [as shown on the page published with her name by the Daily mail today 25 July 2009] has got a far more preferable, and real, view of the 27 year old winner of the by-election! 


And that is saying something!

KHOODEELAAR! Action flashback! KHOODEELAAR! told you so, in July 2006 that Crossrail waqs crass...

Wednesday, July 12, 2006
© Muhammad Haque
By Muhammad HaqueOrganiser

The Brick Lane and the Whitechapel London E1 Area campaign against Crossrail hole Bill

0930 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 12 July 2006

That ‘Crossrail Bill’ is now in the UK Hosue of Commons, 12 July 2006 being allegedly ‘scrutinised’ by the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’]Khoodeelaar! court action may bring wider attention to Crossrail attack on the East End of London than may at first appear to be the case.For a start, the series of actions that is about to begin, will include by definition the type of detailed examination of the evidence against Crossrail that has not been allowed to happen by the CrossRail Bill Select Committee in the UK Hosue of Commons.Although that examination should have taken place, if the claim - that the process of law –making in the UK parliament was taking place – or does take place - at the highest democratic and accountable level were to be justifiableThe realities as we have observed in June 2006 make that [above] expectation a most unrealistic one. The 'meetings' of the UK Housei fo Commons 'Select committee' on the Crossrail Bill were conducted in an openly hostile way to those who had any serious objections to put against the Crossrail Bill.For a start there is no culture of democratic accountability in the UK parliament. No wonder that even a diehard Tory like Quentin Hogg, himself no stranger to constitutional law, was forced to conclude that the system of ‘parliament’ that existed in the UK was one he could describe as an elected dictatorship.A dictatorship, albeit an elected one.But then, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi party too had got elected at one stage,!So what is the difference?I shall report on the expected spaces that make up any alleged difference and on the danger of letting the elected dictatorship extinguish any remaining democratic values from the plastic parliament.Can a programme of court actions produce results that a rally of thousands might not be able to? I think it can do. And I am of the view after organising this Khoodeelaar! Campaign for the past 31 months to stop CrossRail digging holes in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area and mounting other assaults on the community in the East End of London. Can a programme of court actions produce results that a rally of thousands might not be able to? I think it can do. And I am of the view after organising this Khoodeelaar! Campaign for the past 31 months to stop CrossRail digging holes in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area and mounting other assaults on the community in the East End of London. Crossrail threatens to blight most of the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area community. It threatens to drive out of business a very large section of the small business enterprises. And to make the environment a hundred times worse than it currently is. All for nothing. Mainly to make Canary Wharf expand to the City of London! The mind boggles! We are not expecting anything like the length of the McLibel cases. But we are most empathically about to commence something that may well end up as being the second such court action. Are we right to embark on this? Are we right to say that court actions would cost less person hours than organizing and maintaining massive demonstrations involving thousands of human beings would entail? These questions are pertinent right now as we have reached the last phase before formal foiling of constitutional law challenges in court against the promoters and other institutionalised and institutional touts for the CrossRail project and its threat to the East End of London. Long before the Crossrail Bill Select Committee [House of Commons] formally 'heard' some of the evidence against the CrossRail hole Bill threat to the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area, Khoodeelaar! the campaign against CrossRail had decided on a set of actions that included a specific constitutional dimension. After witnessing the blatant obstruction against key presenters of anti-CrossRail evidence in the Committee during June 2006, Khoodeelaar! Has now decided to test the UK law in a way that will perhaps bring the Human Rights Act 1998 into very unexpected focus. 1. The main constitutional law allegation that I could find against the Secretary of State was that he lied in and to Parliament, he misled parliament and he wrongly failed to tell the House of Commons fully and duly of the requirement that UK law had to comply with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental freedoms. 2. That was based on the preliminary and literal reading of the contents of the Crossrail Bill, as introduced to the House of Commons by [the then] Transport Secretary Alistair Darling on 22 February 2005. 3. Having observed since that date the many activities of the Transport Secretary and the rest of the groupings that make up the ‘promoter’ of the Crossrail Bill, it is clear that compatibility with constitutional requirements is not at the top of the priorities of the UK executive seeking to get the Crossrail Bill through Parliament. 4. It has been clear from the behaviour of the two successive holders of the office of Secretary of State at the UK Department for Transport over the past 24 months that compliance with the Treaty obligations on ECHR is nothing more than a nuisance to them and to the Blair regime. They have shown remarkably consistent evidence of hostility to the rule of law and due process and constitutionality for the promotion of the CrossRail project 5. It was only through the sustained campaign on the ground over the past 31 months backed up with original Khoodeelaar!! Legal analyses of the UK executive's behaviour that we have been able to show that the Secretary of State was wrong to have introduced the Crossrail Bill in the shape it was introduced and that he was wrong to have flouted the UK’s constitutional law making treaty obligations that he did. Especially, as I have pointed out on dozens of occasions already including in pieces carried on indymedia UK and international sites, about the abuses of the executive powers to make several hundred million £ available to the promoters without any justification. That abuse of public money ahs included the abuses of the local tiers of peoples and community representation. Where Ruth Kelly herself lives, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council has been one abysmally anti-democratic, anti-community, cabal of corruption, misrepresentation of the local people that is found anywhere in the whole of the UK. And has Ruth Kelly said a word in opposition to the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council? Has she spoken a word in support of the community that is threatened by Crossrail? To those who have sought to make light of our legal action programme, we can only s ay, WATCH this space.

© Muhammad Haque
posted by KHOODEELAAR! NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE BILL

KHOODEELAAR! Told you so! action flashback to July 2006 when Khoodeelaar! said Crossrail was crass...

http://muhammadhaqueexplainskhoodeelaarlegal.blogspot.com/2006_07_01_archive.html

Wednesday, July 12, 2006
© Muhammad Haque

By Muhammad HaqueOrganiser
The Brick Lane and the Whitechapel London E1 Area campaign against Crossrail hole Bill
0930 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 12 July 2006

That ‘Crossrail Bill’ is now in the UK Hosue of Commons, 12 July 2006 being allegedly ‘scrutinised’ by the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’]Khoodeelaar! court action may bring wider attention to Crossrail attack on the East End of London than may at first appear to be the case.For a start, the series of actions that is about to begin, will include by definition the type of detailed examination of the evidence against Crossrail that has not been allowed to happen by the CrossRail Bill Select Committee in the UK Hosue of Commons.Although that examination should have taken place, if the claim - that the process of law –making in the UK parliament was taking place – or does take place - at the highest democratic and accountable level were to be justifiableThe realities as we have observed in June 2006 make that [above] expectation a most unrealistic one. The 'meetings' of the UK Housei fo Commons 'Select committee' on the Crossrail Bill were conducted in an openly hostile way to those who had any serious objections to put against the Crossrail Bill.For a start there is no culture of democratic accountability in the UK parliament. No wonder that even a diehard Tory like Quentin Hogg, himself no stranger to constitutional law, was forced to conclude that the system of ‘parliament’ that existed in the UK was one he could describe as an elected dictatorship.A dictatorship, albeit an elected one.But then, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi party too had got elected at one stage,!So what is the difference?I shall report on the expected spaces that make up any alleged difference and on the danger of letting the elected dictatorship extinguish any remaining democratic values from the plastic parliament.Can a programme of court actions produce results that a rally of thousands might not be able to? I think it can do. And I am of the view after organising this Khoodeelaar! Campaign for the past 31 months to stop CrossRail digging holes in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area and mounting other assaults on the community in the East End of London. Can a programme of court actions produce results that a rally of thousands might not be able to? I think it can do. And I am of the view after organising this Khoodeelaar! Campaign for the past 31 months to stop CrossRail digging holes in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area and mounting other assaults on the community in the East End of London. Crossrail threatens to blight most of the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area community. It threatens to drive out of business a very large section of the small business enterprises. And to make the environment a hundred times worse than it currently is. All for nothing. Mainly to make Canary Wharf expand to the City of London! The mind boggles! We are not expecting anything like the length of the McLibel cases. But we are most empathically about to commence something that may well end up as being the second such court action. Are we right to embark on this? Are we right to say that court actions would cost less person hours than organizing and maintaining massive demonstrations involving thousands of human beings would entail? These questions are pertinent right now as we have reached the last phase before formal foiling of constitutional law challenges in court against the promoters and other institutionalised and institutional touts for the CrossRail project and its threat to the East End of London. Long before the Crossrail Bill Select Committee [House of Commons] formally 'heard' some of the evidence against the CrossRail hole Bill threat to the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area, Khoodeelaar! the campaign against CrossRail had decided on a set of actions that included a specific constitutional dimension. After witnessing the blatant obstruction against key presenters of anti-CrossRail evidence in the Committee during June 2006, Khoodeelaar! Has now decided to test the UK law in a way that will perhaps bring the Human Rights Act 1998 into very unexpected focus. 1. The main constitutional law allegation that I could find against the Secretary of State was that he lied in and to Parliament, he misled parliament and he wrongly failed to tell the House of Commons fully and duly of the requirement that UK law had to comply with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental freedoms. 2. That was based on the preliminary and literal reading of the contents of the Crossrail Bill, as introduced to the House of Commons by [the then] Transport Secretary Alistair Darling on 22 February 2005. 3. Having observed since that date the many activities of the Transport Secretary and the rest of the groupings that make up the ‘promoter’ of the Crossrail Bill, it is clear that compatibility with constitutional requirements is not at the top of the priorities of the UK executive seeking to get the Crossrail Bill through Parliament. 4. It has been clear from the behaviour of the two successive holders of the office of Secretary of State at the UK Department for Transport over the past 24 months that compliance with the Treaty obligations on ECHR is nothing more than a nuisance to them and to the Blair regime. They have shown remarkably consistent evidence of hostility to the rule of law and due process and constitutionality for the promotion of the CrossRail project 5. It was only through the sustained campaign on the ground over the past 31 months backed up with original Khoodeelaar!! Legal analyses of the UK executive's behaviour that we have been able to show that the Secretary of State was wrong to have introduced the Crossrail Bill in the shape it was introduced and that he was wrong to have flouted the UK’s constitutional law making treaty obligations that he did. Especially, as I have pointed out on dozens of occasions already including in pieces carried on indymedia UK and international sites, about the abuses of the executive powers to make several hundred million £ available to the promoters without any justification. That abuse of public money ahs included the abuses of the local tiers of peoples and community representation. Where Ruth Kelly herself lives, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council has been one abysmally anti-democratic, anti-community, cabal of corruption, misrepresentation of the local people that is found anywhere in the whole of the UK. And has Ruth Kelly said a word in opposition to the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council? Has she spoken a word in support of the community that is threatened by Crossrail? To those who have sought to make light of our legal action programme, we can only s ay, WATCH this space. © Muhammad Haque
posted by KHOODEELAAR! NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE BILL

Friday, July 24, 2009

Khoodeelaar! Told you so! Every day. On the internet. And every time there was an utterance peddling Crossrail, we exposed and rebutted it...

2100 Hrs GMT London Friday 24 July 2009:

Khoodeelaar! Told you so! Every day. On the internet. And every time there was an utterance peddling Crossrail, we rebutted such utterance by pointing out the crassness of Crossrail.

Crossrail is crass, as we have been saying it since 2004, because it was crassly conceived.

Crassly conceived at the revival stage in 2003 when the touts and agents of the Military Industrial Complex [as originally diagnosed and exposed in context by the late and lamented social observer John K Galbraith] received a boost with their then enforced field in Iraq and they embarked on the programme of massive looting and plunder of public resources all over the world.

They colluded with Blair in Britain and fabricated a series of ploys that had been contrived to make the CRASSrail scam look legitimate. Even reasonable. We spotted the corrupters at it right on time. And spotted their perpetration.

And we did so in 2004 when they launched their ‘London-wide’ fabrication by using their tout in place at *****y Hall in London SE1, Ken Livingstone…

Livingstone fabricated a letter that he got ‘signed’ [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!] by assorted ‘leaders’ and other tokens occupying plastic positions in the propaganda-linked ‘boroughs’ in London.

Almost all of those tokens were bereft of requisite sense and were devoid of any sense of legitimacy.

They were aping the corrupter of London because they were promised, devil-like, all the goodies and loots that they could ever crave and loots that did never belong to them...

The cravenness, the illegitimacy, the immorality of the operation fronted by Ken Livingstone had to be witnessed to be believed…

We did witness it.

We did warn all that Livingstone was faking it and that he was lying… We identified the leis in Livingstone; contradictions…

And we were vindicated…

It took another four years..

But we were vindicated..

Livingstone himself confessed to have been a liar…. His confession, as we have already reported, took place on the BBC TV Question Time ‘;special’ that was fronted by David Dimbleby days before the 1 May 2008 ‘elections’ over the ‘mayor’ post took place in London….

Those tokens that did ‘sign’ the faking ‘letter’ in early 2004 endorsing’ CrossRail included Tower Hamlets. And Livingstone placed that bogus case in the London NOSTANDARD Standard… And for the next years, up to and including April 2008, the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD carried on publishing garbage plug after garbage plug, plugging the non-existent 'case' for CRASSrail.

The London EVENING nostandards STANDARD was then aided and abetted, in its perpetration of the lies for CRASSrail, by Jo Valentine who abused her position for years and placed peddling pieces in the same standardsless London EVENING STANDARD ….[To be continued]

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Khoodeelaar! No to ‘‘Crossrail scam’’ Campaign organiser comments on today’s London EVENING STANDARD item

1330 Hrs GMT London Thursday 23 July 2009

Khoodeelaar! No to              ‘‘Crossrail scam’’ Campaign organiser comments on today’s London EVENING STANDARD item


'You say ‘fears grow’! Whose fears are those? Not of the people in London. Some secret force must be propelling the propaganda that Crossrail is an aspect of our emotional equilibrium! Surely not the needed answer to the existing transport problems and priorities in London! Scrap Crossrail. Save public money!

- Muhammad Haque, London United Kingdom'
-----------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23723239-details/Fears+grow+that+Tories+would+delay+Crossrail/article.do


News

George Osborne
George Osborne and Boris Johnson disagree over Crossrail, it is claimed

Fears grow that Tories would delay Crossrail

Joe Murphy and Nicholas Cecil
23.07.09

Doubts have emerged about whether the Conservatives will keep London's giant Crossrail project on track and completed on time.

Amid claims that Mayor Boris Johnsonand shadow chancellor George Osborneare at loggerheads over the future of the £16billion scheme, fears are growing that a future Tory government could seek savings by delaying or trimming the east-west rail project.

Mr Osborne's office failed to dispel the fears today when asked by the Standard for a commitment that the scheme will carry on to its timetable of completion by 2017. Instead of a statement with Mr Osborne's authority, the response was a statement from a Tory party spokesman: "There is no change to our position that Crossrail is an important piece of infrastructure for London. That is why we backed it."

The statement left open the possibility of Crossrail going ahead on a later timetable or with some lines or services axed. Insiders have revealed that the Mayor and Mr Osborne had dinner with Tory leader David Cameron at his home earlier this week. Tory sources insisted it was a collegiate event and not an attempt to patch up any disputes.

Gordon Brown gave the final go-ahead to Crossrail two years ago and construction has begun, with laws passed enabling the Mayor to raise funding from London businesses. But there have been reports, including in today's Guardian, that the project may have to be trimmed due to pressure on finances.

Transport Secretary Lord Adonis has pledged it will not be cut and today announced his proposal to extend Crossrail to Reading. He said plans to electrify the rail line to Swansea"make it possible to extend Crossrail, which could bring significant benefits, giving Reading and the wider Thames Valley direct rail access to London and the City".

A spokesman for Mr Johnson said he was absolutely behind Crossrail.

Baroness Valentine, chief executive of business group London First, said: "Crossrail and the Tube are almost as fundamental to London as clean drinking water. Londoners will find it hard to support a party that by failing to invest in the Tube and Crossrail sentences them to decades of transport misery."

Reader views (7)

 Add your view

Here's a sample of the latest views published.

The reality is that the next government is not going to find out the true state of our finances until McClown and Co have been dragged out of Downing Street, there is absolutely no chance of getting the truth out of them before then.
It is a certainty that we are in a far worse mess that NuLiebour will admit. No party aspiring to government is in a position to make firm manifesto commitments until they know how much cash is available. All that they can do in the mean time is to make statements about where their priorities lie.
There is no doubt that uninterrupted cross-London rail travel would be an advantage to the wider economy, as would being able to travel directly between Heathrow and Gatwick without using the world's largest car park aka the M25. However, the rail termini in London and other major cities are a throwback to pre-1948 rail nationalisation, and LHR/LGW have been there for over 75 years. I won't be holding my breath waiting for improvements to be made, by the Tories or anyone else.

- Keith Lonsdale, Doncaster

Crossrail is not just about connecting the West End, City and Docklands, Frank from London. It will enable cross-London travel without having to change trains and endure the Tube, will give thousands the chance of working in our wonderful Capital City on a fast and 21st Century railway, and will link St. Pancras, the gateway to the Continent, with the rest of civilisation.

Why the Tories want to scupper the chance of getting more cars off the road and provide more flexability is beyond me. Anyone who travels daily on the delapidated Tube East-West will know this project is desparately needed, and it's not just the rich who will benefit - it will give the poorer the chance to be commutable into London, will provide many thousands of jobs, and, above all, will just be more convenient.

- Rod, Epping, UK

You say ‘fears grow’! Whose fears are those? Not of the people in London. Some secret force must be propelling the propaganda that Crossrail is an aspect of our emotional equilibrium! Surely not the needed answer to the existing transport problems and priorities in London! Scrap Crossrail. Save public money!

- Muhammad Haque, London United Kingdom

"Crossrail is an important piece of infrastructure for London"
Really? How? It runs from East to West London, don't we already have tube lines that do exactly that?

- Bob, Cheam

This project is a vital piece of investment for the future prosperity of the country. I do hope that the Conservatives have finally accepted the need for a modern rail system. Not making this investment will further delay any improvement in the economy.

- Mike Constable, Islington, London

Boris should scrap Crossrail as it was Red Ken's idea and come up with his own proposal. When he is prime minister he can open it.

- Ruth, Westminster, London

Crossrail doesn't help anyone except greedy bankers in the City and Canary Wharf. Now they've been cleared out no-one will use it and it will be a whiter elephant than the Dome and the Olympics. This country doesn't have the money to build it, the next decade is going to see people have to work a lot harder to get this country back on track, and they need to buck up and get on with it, not moan about their journey to work everyday. If it's that bad don't work in London.

- Frank, London


Add your comment

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditionsmake text area biggerYou have 1500 characters left.