Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Khoodeelaar! Told you so. Wanted a truthful Parliament in the UK! Why the ‘Chilcott Inquiry’ is NOT the right place to find the truth.



1055 [0948] GMT London Wednesday13 January 2010. Editor © Muhammad Haque. Khoodeelaar! Told you so. Wanted a truthful Parliament in the UK!  Why the ‘Chilcott Inquiry’ is NOT the right place to find the truth. Why NO such inquiry can find the truth. They are not appointed to find the truth. These 'inquiries' are appointed to hide the truth. Despite the facades `Q                                ‘suggesting’; that the truth will be established, this inquiry will serve the secret agenda pullers as loyally as did the Hutton, Butler stamped ones.
The truth can only be learnt if the agency that is charged with reporting daily is forced by democratic mandate to start telling the truth on a daily basis.
Why the BBC must begin, after nearly 80 years of 'parliamentary coverage' to tell the truth about Parliament.
The BBC must start telling the truth. The BBC must take the lid off the real role played by MPs, Peers and their controllers. If the BBC starts to tell the truth – if the BBC is democratically mace to start to tell the truth every day- then a great difference will occur in the actual level of awareness in the public about what the 'elected' 'politicians' and their hangers-on [including the parasitic lines, some of whom actually end up being ‘ennobled’ and being pushed into the ‘House of Peers’] get up to in the name of the public. That would truly be ‘the right things to do’! That would be a far better way to prevent the abuses of power, the disservice of office and the looting of the public by the paid politicians.... Can the BBC do this? Can the BBC start to tell the truth? And what about the role played by those inside the BBC, still employed and still being paid significantly large sums of the licence payers' money, who kept their mouth shut and went along with the lying by Campbell, Blair et al in the crucial periods that the so-called Chilcott Inquiry is allegedly about? Has the ‘official’ ‘Opposition’ in the UK “parliament’ the UK Con Party of David Cameron got the morality to make a truthful pledge to scrap the BBC’s behaving like a Corporation of secret agenda? Has D Cameron got what it takes to call Mark Thompson’s bluff and uncover the BBC? What is the secret ‘constituting the BBC’s  editorial agenda' that only the BBC bureaucrats in place at the time know, understand and are capable of implementing  while the rest of the population don't have the capacity to understand? What is the BBC for if it is for hiding the truth and overwhelming the viewers and listeners with coverage of lies, fabrications, and diversions?  These questions cannot be answered. There is no atmosphere in ‘Britain’ today that will compel the BBC morally, ethically and democratically to confess all and start telling the truth. And contrary to the posturing, the UK D Cameron Party and HIS Party hangers on are as interested in self-service and petty careerism as are their counterparts now in place via the Blaired bureaucracies. The same applies to the Nick Cameron outfit. And to the even smaller ones in the currently ‘constituted’ Palace of Ghostsminster. Why? Because the ‘Committees’ of MPs’ and those of  “Peers” are NOT about extracting the truth, let alone about holding the Executive to democratic, ethical, constitutional, legal and universally understood account. Those are sham outfits, devised to be sham affairs.  BOTH ‘Select Committees’ behaved as stooged committees. Both prevented the examination of the agenda that underlay the ‘CrossRail Bill’ Both fabricated evidence and published lies. They abused their positions and went along with the corrupt agenda of ethnicity linking in the context of the East End of London about which they licensed the setting up of a surrogate ‘committee’. This had been prompted by the undisclosed forces behind the Crossrail, scam who could not counter the arguments being advanced by Khoodeelaar!. So the Big Business devised a strategy of recruiting ;ethnic surrogates’ who would then be used to create the image that the ‘interests of ethnicity linked’ East London were being ‘catered for’. They also created bogus spots under Ken Livingstone's Transport for London and gave personally beneficial positions to ethnicity-linked surrogates. They did all of this to perpetuate the lie that attacking the community via the CrossRail Big Business agenda amounted to’ doing benefits to the attacked community’!!!!!!    BOTH Houses of UK Parliament were used to promote the lying agenda like this over ‘CrossRail Bill’.

This was confirmed once again, in the series of sittings, and allegedly open and allegedly public deliberations made by the so-called ‘Select Committee’ of MPs and later on by that of PEERs in 2005 - 2008 in their unconstitutional, undemocratic, untruthfully staged spectacles for the ‘Crossrail Bill’. At every stage, the ‘Palace of Ghostsminster’  was seen as being sued as a Place of Ghostsminster where live, democratic real concerns about the damaging effects of Crossrail scam on the communities and  the demands from the public were treated as  inadmissible. The two ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘Select Committees’ behaved as ‘Secret Committees’ where the real agenda remained secret as the front men and women operating the two stooged committees put on performances suggesting that they were there listening to the objectors and taking into account the views of the objectors to the “Crossrail Scam”. The two ‘Secret Committees’ did everything to thwart the real objectors and to distort and twist the objectors’ evidence.

[To be continued]

No comments: