KHOODEELAAR! Evidentially contextually noting a prize incident: a comment on the London Guardian web site denouncing Crossrail and Ken Livingstone. Livingstone and Crossrail are not really scrutinised on that Guardian slot. It is a grinning one dedicated to serving the ego of Ken Livingstone and peddling the agenda of Big Business elements pushing for the looting scam to be made legitimate. That slot on the Guardian web site is on the facts reserved and maintained for peddling all lies, fabrications that will reinstate the careerist Ken Livingstone to the post he still craves, in the name and at the expense of the people of London. For this reason, the slot fabricates an image of Ken Livingstone as being all things designed to help the poor and the assorted stereotyped ‘dispossessed’ people of the rest of the world. It is of course a lie and a distortion. The truth is as it always has been that Ken Livingstone only ever serves his own ego, his own career, his own personal agenda and his own ambitions. In pursuing these, he will tout for anyone that he thinks will do the job of meeting his craving for the craved objective. There is no morality in his scheme. Only opportunity and opportunism. And he is a backer of the worst stereotypes that perpetuate racism and other discrimination. Discrimination as defined universally and objectively. The following quote taken from the “grinning, peddling-for-Ken Livingstone slot on the Guardian web site” is a typical, classic piece of distortion. It is deeply racist and is an outrage to truth. Although the source of the comment may intend to criticise and expose [as objectively defined] the records and the proclivities of Ken Livingstone, the commenter gets it wrong by relying on his or her own ignorance of history, of migration, of the UK’s dependence on the rest of the world for the UK’s economic substance and social stability as he or she lumps together groups of stereotyped people as being the beneficiaries of the agenda they wrongly attributed to Ken Livingstone.

0850 Hrs GMT 

London 

Thursday 

22 April 2010. 

Editor © Muhammad Haque. 

KHOODEELAAR! Evidentially contextually noting a prize incident: a comment on the London Guardian web site denouncing Crossrail and Ken Livingstone.  Livingstone and Crossrail are not really scrutinised on that Guardian slot. It is a grinning one dedicated to serving the ego of Ken Livingstone and peddling the agenda of Big Business elements pushing for the looting scam to be made legitimate.  That slot on the Guardian web site is on the facts reserved and maintained for peddling all lies, fabrications that will reinstate the careerist Ken Livingstone to the post he still craves, in the name and at the expense of the people of London. For this reason, the slot fabricates an image of Ken Livingstone as being all things designed to help the poor and the assorted stereotyped  ‘dispossessed’ people of the rest of the world. It is of course a lie and a distortion. The truth is as it always has been that Ken Livingstone only ever serves his own ego, his own career, his own personal agenda and his own ambitions. In pursuing these, he will tout for anyone that he thinks will do the job of meeting his craving for the craved objective. There is no morality in his scheme. Only opportunity and opportunism. And he is a backer of the worst stereotypes that perpetuate racism and other discrimination. Discrimination as defined universally and objectively.  The following quote taken from the “grinning, peddling-for-Ken Livingstone slot on the Guardian web site” is a typical, classic piece of distortion. It is deeply racist and is an outrage to truth. Although the source of the comment may intend to criticise and expose [as objectively defined] the records and the proclivities of Ken Livingstone, the commenter gets it wrong by relying on his or her own ignorance of history, of migration, of the UK’s dependence on the rest of the world for the UK’s economic substance and social stability as he or she lumps together groups of stereotyped people as being the beneficiaries of the agenda they wrongly attributed to Ken Livingstone. 

[To be continued]

"

I keep telling ya, Crossrail is basically a very expensive busing scheme to try and keep white collar workers and white collar jobs in London.

Livingstone was happy to see middle class people (of all shades) leaving the capital at a rate of 170,000 per year (ONS stats based on re-registration at NHS GP practices).

And the Tories probably regard the areas inside the North and South circulars as enemy territory, so why should they give a stuff for Crossrail?

Zone 1 and 2 Ken wanted to build a trans-national city state of the poor, ambitious and dispossessed and he succeeded to a great extent. Perhaps we can now stew in our own transient, minimum wage, multicultural juices.

Incidentally, I saw that Martin Linton round my way the other day. When he loses Battersea, the seats on the western edge of the WEZ will have gone Tory...wonder why?

"