KHOODEELAAR! challenges the latest 'journalist' to carry plugs for Big Business scam Crossrail to produce evidence-justifying Crossrail. This challenge has been published on the New Statesman magazine’s web site. They had carried a plug in their reporting of this morning’s launch of the UK Con party's Election 2010 Manifesto. They said that the UK Con party were being ambivalent on Crossrail. What they meant was that the David Cameron-fronted UK Con party ‘Election Team’ has refused to go OTT in hyping the CRASSrail scam.. And that that was taking a political gamble. They meant that Crossrail would carry votes. Khoodeelaar! rebuttal so far to the New Statesman [the London-based journal which has been often hyped because it was linked with the trendies' favourite 'historical socialist figures' of the 20th century- Sidney and Beatrice Webb] promotion of Crossrail is as follows: " Where is the evidence that in transport economics, the so-called Crossrail is the key priority? Where in any of the web sites you refer to, as backing 'Crossrail' in the context of your reference to the UK Con party’s 'Manifesto' is there any acknowledgement of the full framework of transport that must be identified, recognised and then physically put in place? In the SIX years and two months [January 2004 to date 13 April 2010] of daily examination of the contents of the propaganda by the Big Business agenda Crossrail scam-peddlers, I have not come across any of the evidence that must otherwise be present if the peddlers’ claims for CrossRail are to be believable. I am always willing to review my previous findings and assertions if compelling evidence is shown to me from the appropriate sources. Warranting an objective review of earlier conclusions. Where are those sources, if they actually exist? As of now, 1128 Hrs GMT Tuesday 13 April 2010, I have not seen or found any evidence whatsoever for the promotion of the 'Crossrail' scam. What I have found is the propensity on the part of career-seekers to throw in Crossrail as part of a package of 'PROJECTS' THEY WANT TO flaunt as constituting their 'suitability' to voters and to others in the ordinary community who are targets of the zombifying propaganda. In the UK Houses of Commons and 'Peers' in the years 2006-2008 when the 'Crossrail Bill' was being allegedly scrutinised’ the objectors, represented by my own umbrella campaign organisation Khoodeelaar! representing thousands of signatories ready to put forward clear grounds showing that 'Crossrail' was not either a priority nor the panacea that some of its post-holding touts have been peddling it to be, the 'Parliamentary' 'committees' obstructed the presentation of the evidence. And they did so quite blatantly. Their lying was put on HANSARD [the 'official' record of proceedings in the UK Parliament] of their obstructions and obfuscation. As a student of universally definable economics, I am open to resources being put to the appropriate use. Crossrail does not meet the arduously listed criteria. And I here cite Rod Eddington, who had been appointed by the Gordon Brown - Alistair Darling 'team' to look at the future of railways in the UK. As the USA business journal FORBES reported, Rod Eddington had refused to endorse Crossrail! And as if that were not telling enough, Channel 4 News in October 2007 reported that Gordon Brown had just given his backing to Crossrail AGAINST the advice of Rod Eddington. So what is your evidence for saying that the UK Con Cameron is taking a gamble by being ambivalent on the 'Crossrail' scam? What part of which London Parliamentary constituency have you in mind when you make such an unfounded claim? Muhammad Haque, Organiser, Khoodeelaar! The campaign against Big Business agenda scam Crossrail. London. UK"

1240 [1128] Hrs GMT

London

Tuesday

13 April 2010

KHOODEELAAR! challenges latest 'journalist' to carry plugs for Big Business cam Crossrail to produce evidence-justifying Crossrail. This challenge has been published on the New Statesman magazine’s web site. They had carried a plug in their reporting of this morning’s launch of the UK Con party's Election 2010 Manifesto. They said that the UK Con party were being ambivalent on Crossrail.  What they meant was that the David Cameron-fronted UK Con party ‘Election Team’ has refused to go OTT in hyping the CRASSrail scam.. And that that was taking a political gamble. They meant that Crossrail would carry votes. Khoodeelaar! rebuttal so far to the New Statesman [the London-based journal which has been often hyped because it was linked with the trendies' favourite 'historical socialist figures' of the 20th century- Sidney and Beatrice Webb] promotion of Crossrail is as follows: " Where is the evidence that in transport economics, the so-called Crossrail is the key priority? Where in any of the web sites you refer to, as backing 'Crossrail' in the context of your reference to the UK Con party’s 'Manifesto' is there any acknowledgement of the full framework of transport that must be identified, recognised and then physically put in place? In the SIX years and two months [January 2004 to date 13 April 2010] of daily examination of the contents of the propaganda by the Big Business agenda Crossrail scam-peddlers, I have not come across any of the evidence that must otherwise be present if the peddlers’ claims for CrossRail are to be believable. I am always willing to review my previous findings and assertions if compelling evidence is shown to me from the appropriate sources. Warranting an objective review of earlier conclusions. Where are those sources, if they actually exist? As of now, 1128 Hrs GMT Tuesday 13 April 2010, I have not seen or found any evidence whatsoever for the promotion of the 'Crossrail' scam. What I have found is the propensity on the part of career-seekers to throw in Crossrail as part of a package of 'PROJECTS' THEY WANT TO flaunt as constituting their 'suitability' to voters and to others in the ordinary community who are targets of the zombifying propaganda. In the UK Houses of Commons and 'Peers' in the years 2006-2008 when the 'Crossrail Bill' was being allegedly scrutinised’ the objectors, represented by my own umbrella campaign organisation Khoodeelaar! representing thousands of signatories ready to put forward clear grounds showing that 'Crossrail' was not either a priority nor the panacea that some of its post-holding touts have been peddling it to be, the 'Parliamentary' 'committees' obstructed the presentation of the evidence. And they did so quite blatantly. Their lying was put on HANSARD [the 'official' record of proceedings in the UK Parliament] of their obstructions and obfuscation. As a student of universally definable economics, I am open to resources being put to the appropriate use. Crossrail does not meet the arduously listed criteria. And I here cite Rod Eddington, who had been appointed by the Gordon Brown - Alistair Darling 'team' to look at the future of railways in the UK. As the USA business journal FORBES reported, Rod Eddington had refused to endorse Crossrail! And as if that were not telling enough, Channel 4 News in October 2007 reported that Gordon Brown had just given his backing to Crossrail AGAINST the advice of Rod Eddington. So what is your evidence for saying that the UK Con Cameron is taking a gamble by being ambivalent on the 'Crossrail' scam? What part of which London Parliamentary constituency have you in mind when you make such an unfounded claim? Muhammad Haque, Organiser, Khoodeelaar! The campaign against Big Business agenda scam Crossrail. London. UK"