2118 [200 [1950][1930] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
25 April 2010.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
Crass role by Crassrail-peddler Ruth Kelly! Ruth Kelly whose sluttish whisper we pointed out in our latest update of our questions to her and her co-touts for the Big Business agenda wasteful scam CrossRail only in the past 24 hours, was, of course the UK Transport Secretary when she resigned as part of the last Bliaring putsch as part of the mini-bid to oust the BLIARing ‘rival’ Gordon Brown out of No 10 Downing Street. What a Crass role model! How could Ruth Kelly be trusted on her sluttish whisper for CrossRail? Those cringe-making words uttered by her on camera [5 October 2007] in an even more cringe-making way than any of her contextually known and citable co-‘Bliar-Babes’ could be accused of being capable of…She was never one of the people as far as the 'most deprived’ borough Tower Hamlets was concerned. No one in the East End, unless they were in some secret arrangement or dubious deal or trade that was not an ordinary, decent way of earning a living, who was on an ordinary income, could dream of doing the things that she was doing whist still claiming to live in the same borough. The offensive claim that she was [and probably still is] married to a former Tower Hamlets Borough Council [Bliaring] councillor was also misleading as it gave the additional false impression that she had married one of the ‘designated depriveds’. The truth was a hundred miles away from that kind of fabricated image making. Just as the Canary Wharf station – so overly hyped by the liars touting on for Big Business agenda scam CrossRail- is from the typically ordinary and neglected and deprived parts of the inner London borough of Tower Hamlets. As the truth of the ‘regeneration’ of any parts of the East End as touted by Ruth Kelly’s co-peddler, Ken Livingstone [same date, 5 October 2007] Now, the disclosure about her dishonesty and opportunism over her children’s schooling comes in the Mail on Sunday today [25 April 2010] showing her hypocrisy and her utter contempt for any standard of equality for the ordinary people. As far as she is concerned, the ordinary people can rot in their deprivation while the likes of Ruth Kelly move on and 'provide for their children'. What the likes of Ruth Kelly do and have been doing for years is to condemn the ordinary people to low standards or no standards. When she took her own children away from the 'comprehensive' schools OPTION she had in Tower Hamlets and put them in exclusive ones that ordinary Tower Hamlets parents could only dream about, Ruth Kelly showed that as a BLIARing selfish self-seeker she did not have to hide her low standards and morality free ‘life choices’. She could flaunt them and she could do so whilst still putting on a smile as she knew that neither the Bliaring regime nor the Blaring local Tower Hamlets Council corrupt controlling clique was in a position to disown her, let alone to make an example of her by publicly distancing themselves from her misconduct. Misconduct is the word we intend to use and have used. We invite her to provide us with evidence that can truthfully invalidate our use of the word that she is guilty of public misconduct.
All of that stands in sharp contrast to her other image, which the corrupt sections in the ‘mainstream’ 'media’ perpetuated for years, that she was some sort of diehard religiously dedicated Roman Catholic fanatic due to her claimed membership of the sect Opus Dei which she was reported to show in her near-fetishist wearing of a particular piece of excruciatingly painful item of sect-linked ritualistic gear! Some have even tried to link her with very far right tendencies, such as was done in the immediate aftermath of her appointment to the post of Education Secretary by Tony Blair.
The hostile profiles of Ruth Kelly included several references to the Da Vinci Code and its portrayal of the Opus Dei as a nasty outfit involved in sinister activities.
It is our studied view that Ruth Kelly was probably so seriously targeted in THAT propaganda because of the frustration as experienced by Big Business interests which wanted to promote in Britain a whole range of experiments which the Roman Catholic faith forbids and which Ruth Kelly would not therefore support.
Ruth Kelly has behaved as an irresponsible politician. She has failed to address those allegations in public and for that she alone is to be held responsible. Not her faith. Not her Sect. Not even her husband.
Compare her silence on those allegations to her vocal as we have shown, sluttishly whispered promotion of - Yes, a Big Business scam - Crossrail! The mind seriously boggles.
Ruth Kelly has behaved as another MP or now, as a soon to become ex-MP. Grabbing and doing so ruthlessly! Irony, satire and contempt all rolled into that one recitation of her published first name!
And what a trail of moral poverty she has left behind in her once parliamentary constituency in Bolton, Lancs as well!
Ands she was asking the UK public to allow her to waste £Billions on Crossrail! She could not be trusted at all.
[To be continued]
London
Sunday
25 April 2010.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
Crass role by Crassrail-peddler Ruth Kelly! Ruth Kelly whose sluttish whisper we pointed out in our latest update of our questions to her and her co-touts for the Big Business agenda wasteful scam CrossRail only in the past 24 hours, was, of course the UK Transport Secretary when she resigned as part of the last Bliaring putsch as part of the mini-bid to oust the BLIARing ‘rival’ Gordon Brown out of No 10 Downing Street. What a Crass role model! How could Ruth Kelly be trusted on her sluttish whisper for CrossRail? Those cringe-making words uttered by her on camera [5 October 2007] in an even more cringe-making way than any of her contextually known and citable co-‘Bliar-Babes’ could be accused of being capable of…She was never one of the people as far as the 'most deprived’ borough Tower Hamlets was concerned. No one in the East End, unless they were in some secret arrangement or dubious deal or trade that was not an ordinary, decent way of earning a living, who was on an ordinary income, could dream of doing the things that she was doing whist still claiming to live in the same borough. The offensive claim that she was [and probably still is] married to a former Tower Hamlets Borough Council [Bliaring] councillor was also misleading as it gave the additional false impression that she had married one of the ‘designated depriveds’. The truth was a hundred miles away from that kind of fabricated image making. Just as the Canary Wharf station – so overly hyped by the liars touting on for Big Business agenda scam CrossRail- is from the typically ordinary and neglected and deprived parts of the inner London borough of Tower Hamlets. As the truth of the ‘regeneration’ of any parts of the East End as touted by Ruth Kelly’s co-peddler, Ken Livingstone [same date, 5 October 2007] Now, the disclosure about her dishonesty and opportunism over her children’s schooling comes in the Mail on Sunday today [25 April 2010] showing her hypocrisy and her utter contempt for any standard of equality for the ordinary people. As far as she is concerned, the ordinary people can rot in their deprivation while the likes of Ruth Kelly move on and 'provide for their children'. What the likes of Ruth Kelly do and have been doing for years is to condemn the ordinary people to low standards or no standards. When she took her own children away from the 'comprehensive' schools OPTION she had in Tower Hamlets and put them in exclusive ones that ordinary Tower Hamlets parents could only dream about, Ruth Kelly showed that as a BLIARing selfish self-seeker she did not have to hide her low standards and morality free ‘life choices’. She could flaunt them and she could do so whilst still putting on a smile as she knew that neither the Bliaring regime nor the Blaring local Tower Hamlets Council corrupt controlling clique was in a position to disown her, let alone to make an example of her by publicly distancing themselves from her misconduct. Misconduct is the word we intend to use and have used. We invite her to provide us with evidence that can truthfully invalidate our use of the word that she is guilty of public misconduct.
All of that stands in sharp contrast to her other image, which the corrupt sections in the ‘mainstream’ 'media’ perpetuated for years, that she was some sort of diehard religiously dedicated Roman Catholic fanatic due to her claimed membership of the sect Opus Dei which she was reported to show in her near-fetishist wearing of a particular piece of excruciatingly painful item of sect-linked ritualistic gear! Some have even tried to link her with very far right tendencies, such as was done in the immediate aftermath of her appointment to the post of Education Secretary by Tony Blair.
The hostile profiles of Ruth Kelly included several references to the Da Vinci Code and its portrayal of the Opus Dei as a nasty outfit involved in sinister activities.
It is our studied view that Ruth Kelly was probably so seriously targeted in THAT propaganda because of the frustration as experienced by Big Business interests which wanted to promote in Britain a whole range of experiments which the Roman Catholic faith forbids and which Ruth Kelly would not therefore support.
Ruth Kelly has behaved as an irresponsible politician. She has failed to address those allegations in public and for that she alone is to be held responsible. Not her faith. Not her Sect. Not even her husband.
Compare her silence on those allegations to her vocal as we have shown, sluttishly whispered promotion of - Yes, a Big Business scam - Crossrail! The mind seriously boggles.
Ruth Kelly has behaved as another MP or now, as a soon to become ex-MP. Grabbing and doing so ruthlessly! Irony, satire and contempt all rolled into that one recitation of her published first name!
And what a trail of moral poverty she has left behind in her once parliamentary constituency in Bolton, Lancs as well!
Ands she was asking the UK public to allow her to waste £Billions on Crossrail! She could not be trusted at all.
[To be continued]
No comments:
Post a Comment